ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 17458|回复: 55
打印 上一主题 下一主题

哪位大虾能帮助翻译一下OG-61?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-15 19:11:00 | 只看该作者

哪位大虾能帮助翻译一下OG-61?

The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government`s huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future cuurrency decline.


Which of the following, if true, would most serious weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?


答案:Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused decline in the dollar`s value.


沙发
发表于 2004-4-15 22:52:00 | 只看该作者
最近的美元贬值是有一个过低的经济预期导致的。但是过低的经济预期将不影响美元如果政府没有和严重的预算赤字,这个预算赤字必需被减少以防止将来的货币贬值
板凳
发表于 2004-4-15 22:54:00 | 只看该作者

提干的意思是:经济增长放缓的预测导致美元的贬值,但是如果政府没有巨大的赤字,预测是不会对美元产生副作用的(即不会引起贬值),所以,为了防止将来货币贬值,政府要减少赤字。


请指正!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-16 23:35:00 | 只看该作者
恩……谢谢2位,没什么可以指正的了。嘻嘻
5#
发表于 2004-5-29 01:40:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rice3434在2004-4-15 19:11:00的发言:

The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government`s huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future cuurrency decline.


Which of the following, if true, would most serious weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?


B:The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.


答案D:Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused decline in the dollar`s value.


那位能帮忙解释一下为什么B不对? 我知道D最贴切, 但不知道B为什么无关. 我对下面这句话理解不明:

But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government`s huge budget deficit

这里it指prediction, for翻译为"因为"吗? 这个for可把我害苦了. 如果题目要表达prediction 与deficit共同作用, 则应该是: that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had there not been the government's huge budget deficit.

既然题目用it had been for说明deficit 与prediction有关系. 而且可能是deficit导致prediction. 这样一推下来, B项deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth 也可推出deficit不能导致prediction of slower economic, 也就起了削弱作用.

请各位指点.


谢谢


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-29 3:44:16编辑过]
6#
发表于 2004-5-29 04:36:00 | 只看该作者
题目说了:要不是政府财政赤字的影响,经济增长缓慢的预测不会对美元价值产生负面影响。og 的解释比较清楚了。"The argument assumes that a particular predict can cause a currency decline only if accompanied by a large budget deficit" D中说了,没有政府财政赤字的影响,经济增长缓慢的预测曾多次导致美元的价值下跌。很明显weaken了结论。B中只说了大的财政赤字会导致经济增长缓慢,这一点题目也说到了,support了原题。但是没有提到经济增长缓慢的预测对美元的影响,所以这个选项是inappropriate的。
7#
发表于 2004-5-29 05:55:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢babypace!

if it had not been for 翻译成"要不是因为"?是习惯用法吗? it 不是指prediction?

这个题论据是: that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government`s huge budget deficit. 结论是:deficit must therefore be decreased to prevent future cuurrency decline. 题目要求:weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines.

D选项推翻了论据, 因而削弱了结论.

B选项: The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth. 我因为"if it had not been for " 理解成了"要不是这个prediction是针对deficit ", 这就变成了deficit导致prediction了.

按OG的解释,实际上prediction of slower economic growth 和government`s huge budget deficit是并列关系, 不是因果关系.

所以关键在"if it had not been for "的理解上.

babypace MM能帮助确认"if it had not been for "的意思吗?

thanks again

8#
发表于 2004-6-15 19:38:00 | 只看该作者

OG对这题C项的解释看不明白:

(C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.

OG:Since C supports the claim that a budget deficit is the underlying cause of the currency decline, C is inappropriate.

提干说在有deficit的前提下,prediction可以引发decline。没有deficit,prediction不会引发decline。而C项只能说除了prediction,他因也可导致decline。

怎么能看出来是C supports the claim that a budget deficit is the underlying cause of the currency decline呢?

9#
发表于 2004-6-18 00:41:00 | 只看该作者
i feel confused with the explaination of ETS, but i found a method how to elimite the wrong answers: you can quick elimite the answers with one, two, or four stuffs, which are in the argument with only three stuffs. the instences such as 33, 61.   i just point 2,because i only review here.  if you think i am wrong, please tell me.  for my poor english, i just find this way.
10#
发表于 2004-6-18 11:26:00 | 只看该作者

偶对此题的逻辑理解是:

提干说A是伴随B起到某种作用,削弱,就说不需要B,A本身就起到作用。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 21:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部