OG-44(连接当中没找到!)

Ninger

44. Some people have questioined the judge's objectivity in cases of sex discrimination against women. But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women. This record demonstrates that the judge has not discriminiated against women in cases of sex discrimination against women.

The arugument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that

A. a large number of the judge's cases arouse out of allegations of sex discrimination against women

B. many judges find it difficult to be objective in cases of sex discrimination against women

C. The judge is biased against women defendants or plaintiffs in cases that do not involve sex discrimination

D.The majority of the cases of sex discrimination against women that have reached the judges court have been appealed from a lower court

E. The evidence shows that the women should have won in more than 60 percent of the judges cases involving sex discrimination against women

选E, 我没看懂

yingji

E说的是,证据显示女人应当赢得多于60%的涉及性别歧视的案件

babypace

恩。这题是第一次问，所以没有从前的连接。

同意ｙｉｎｇｊｉ的解释。这题是非常直接的提出原推论的缺陷

wonderful0928

But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women.

这句话在题干中应作何解？求全文翻译，谢谢

hawkinsxie

题干：有证据显示，在60%的有关性别歧视的案件中，judge倾向于女性。===〉judge在此类案件中排斥女性的观点是错的。

题目：要求驳斥

则：显然原题是有一般事实推出普遍真理。一般，我们用驳斥论据的方法。

我爱欧洲

OG解释中说，the flaw in the argument is that is assumes erroneously that a mojority of decisions favorable to women in SD cases demonstrates absence of discriminatory behavior……。这是否可理解为WEAKEN的对象为推理成立的前提？

lindazhou

B, C 为什么与提干无关呢？

EASYSUMMER

论证过程：60％以上对妇女的歧视案是以利于女性为结果判的－－－》在此类案子的审判上没有歧视妇女。

B 法官发现很多这类案子很难保证客观。（不客观的结果是双向的，即偏向女性或反之.)  与论证过程无关

C 法官对于不涉及性别歧视的案子中的女上诉者有歧视。  

继续讨论

cg

以下是引用EASYSUMMER在2005-6-24 23:50:00的发言：

论证过程：60％以上对妇女的歧视案是以利于女性为结果判的－－－》在此类案子的审判上没有歧视妇女。

B 法官发现很多这类案子很难保证客观。（不客观的结果是双向的，即偏向女性或反之.)  与论证过程无关

C 法官对于不涉及性别歧视的案子中的女上诉者有歧视。  

继续讨论

根据OG上的解释

Choice B and C introduce considerations with no bearing on the reasoning of the argument. Because the argument concerns a particular judge, B is inappropriate; because it concerns cases of particular type, C is inappropriate.

因此，B的错误应该在于题干是讨论 the judge。答案中many judges不在讨论范围内。

C的错误在于题干仅讨论关于sex discrimination against women,，答案中 in cases that do not involve sex discrimination不在讨论范围内。

snowjing

以下是引用hawkinsxie在2005-3-18 19:57:00的发言：

题干：有证据显示，在60%的有关性别歧视的案件中，judge倾向于女性。===〉judge在此类案件中排斥女性的观点是错的。

题目：要求驳斥

则：显然原题是有一般事实推出普遍真理。一般，我们用驳斥论据的方法。

愚笨的我还是没有看明白：

题干中"But the record shows that in sixty percent of such cases, the judge has decided in favor of the women. ", 与E选项中"the women should have won in more than 60 percent of the judges cases involving sex discrimination against women " 说得不是同一个意思吗？

请大家帮助，谢谢！