ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: pengxudong
打印 上一主题 下一主题

pengxudong的写作贴,求不留情批改

[复制链接]
31#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-19 04:33:08 | 只看该作者
9月18日 独立+综合    谢谢指导

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
32#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-20 17:49:33 | 只看该作者

9月19日 独立    谢谢指导

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
33#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-21 05:08:48 | 只看该作者
9月20日 综合    谢谢指导

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
34#
发表于 2013-9-21 21:38:44 | 只看该作者
楼主改完了~抱歉晚了哈~

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
35#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-22 04:09:33 | 只看该作者
9月21日 独立     谢谢指导

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
36#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-23 03:50:18 | 只看该作者
9月22日 综合     谢谢指导

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
37#
发表于 2013-9-23 20:21:13 | 只看该作者
The author provides three reasons,including growing human population, increasing agriculture lands, and morepesticide use, to claim that the number of birds will continue declining.However, the professor offers some evidences tostate that all three arguments mentioned in the reading passage areunconvincing.
    Firstly, the number of some types of birds would increase due to urbangrowth. Although urban growth has a negative influence on certain types of birdpopulations, the number of other types of birds are likely to increase such aspigeons. It is because more advantageous habitats can be found in cities forthese types of birds. Therefore, it contradicts the statement in the readingpassage that all bird populations would decline.
     Secondly, agricultural activities would notresult in further destruction of bird habitats. The truth is that less and lesslands are being used for agricultural purposes in the United States. Also, morefood can be produced since there are more productive crops. Therefore, there isno need for people to expand agricultural lands anymore, which directlycontrasts with what is stated in the reading passage that more wildness areaswould be converted to agricultural use.
    Thirdly, pesticides would have less and less negative effect on birdpopulations. The professor says that pesticides have become less toxic thanever due to the people's awareness of negative influence of pesticides on environments.Besides, there are more pest-resistant crops now than before, thus lesspesticides are needed to control the number of pests. As a result, theprofessor refutes the statement in the reading passage that pesticides wouldcontinuously contribute to decline in bird population.


Conclusion: points in the lecture is overall and specific making little mistakes.
1、听力中的点全面且详细,语句流畅,用词多变
2、但对reading 和lecture的关联性表述不足。Question of integrated writng is: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading message  一般每段会在开头对reading的推理过程有一段简述,结尾可以一段总结。前面的部分就是explain how。具体的亲可以看看范文或者模板。
3、如果时间充足,可以在文末加一个总结的
38#
发表于 2013-9-23 22:52:54 | 只看该作者
pengxudong 发表于 2013-9-22 04:09
9月21日 独立     谢谢指导

十分抱歉今天有些事情没有来得及改~明天我给你修改哈~
39#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-24 04:28:21 | 只看该作者
五五波 发表于 2013-9-23 20:21
The author provides three reasons,including growing human population, increasing agriculture lands,  ...

哈哈,关联性有反映哟,在每段的最后一句话。我这种写法是模仿OG中的满分范文的格式哟
40#
发表于 2013-9-24 20:45:08 | 只看该作者
改好了·抱歉这么晚...

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-28 05:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部