The professor in the lecture refutes thestatement in the reading passage that the communal online encyclopedias areless valuable than traditional, printed ones. Instead, she claims that thecommunal online encyclopedias are tremendously more advantageous thantraditional, printed ones. In the beginning, it is mentioned in thereading passage that a communal online encyclopedia is often less reliable dueto a lack of academic credentials of contributors. However, the professorpoints out that mistakes in a comprehensive, printed encyclopedia often remainthere for decades and are easier to be spotted since it is difficult to correctinformation in a printed one compared with an online encyclopedia. Therefore,it is hardly a fair criticism that online encyclopedias have errors.(这里好像还有个点没提到,就是我们很难找到没有错误的书,就算是纸质版的,所以教授觉得容易修改的才是好的) Secondly, in terms of(这个短语好像你比较喜欢用,TPO5里面也用了,但是我觉得其实用得不太准确,或者说不符合美国人的习惯吧.你自己翻译一下,其实意思怪怪的:根据黑客,教授提出……其实应该是根据黑客会破坏正确性这一观点,教授提出……)hackers who tamper with entries, the professor states that online encyclopediashave realized the importance of protecting articles by instituting two kinds ofstrategies. The first one is to use a read-only format to maintain crucialfactors in order to prevent them from being tampered. Also, a special editor isused to monitor all changed entries, eliminating the clearly maliciousinformation. All above strategies help to prevent articles from beingmaliciously tampered. Finally, when it comes to the proportionof topics, the professor says that the reason why traditional encyclopedias have to decide what isimportant or not is because(语病,去掉because,加that) there is only limited space.However, it is not an issue for online ones. Besides, traditional encyclopediasusually do not reflect great range of interests of the public since they areonly edited by a small number of people, while online ones, containing a greatvariety of topics and articles, accurately represent the interests of themajority. Thus, online encyclopedias are more advantageous than traditionalones. 1. 每段之间空了一行,开头就不要空格了,直接顶格写~ 2. 你的文章对阅读材料和听力的还原度很高,我觉得好强,像我这一篇听力就没太听明白,感觉不熟悉,生词多,我就写得不太精确。 3. 总体来说,你写得真的很好,内容,词汇,句式,语法,结构都很不错,昨天我给你的建议,你也马上就尝试采用了,我要多向你学习!!!
|