E
关键在于理解吧,问题中不是“误导选民去认为要extenging”
而是问的“会误导那些已经认为是extending的选民”
注意that的修饰啊!
下面是我的一些观点,考试时我还是会选择E的
★Q38:
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled
“Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign
workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking
restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail
establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
翻译:在一个州,所有的城市和乡镇里都有反吸烟的法令.一个以“请求州范围内的吸烟限制”命名的请愿被发放到选民们中去,但这些选民只被竞选工作人员问了一个问题:“你们愿意为全州范围的吸烟限制签名请愿吗?”而实际上,那个请愿只要求州法律禁止在零售业机构和政府机构那些公共场所吸烟。
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition(请愿) as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances (法令)statewide?(下面哪种情况下这种请愿会误导选民,而那些选民本以为请愿是建议将地方法律扩展到州法令而是限烟更有效)
A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers. 无关
B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.(无关!题目说的是请愿与选民之间,与这个petition是否是公正对待地区的无关,而且这项有关,petition的建议并没有说明他们不同意在其他地方的禁烟,或者这个建议与地方是否还生效无关)
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.州法令本身高于地方法令==没有误导,符合选民观点,即州法令更有效
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.无关
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.(州法令的效力实际不如地方法令,这样的请愿方式就会误导选民,让其投错票,即实际上投票结果是使禁烟更没有效力了)
|