GDW24-25

rainbow582

我是觉得，如果E对，那么这些人看到骑墙哥有了这个新的‘advise’不该surprise啊，因为（E）It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars，这个答案解释了骑墙哥为什么advise黑哥们别再为维权闹腾，而是和白兄弟们来一个solidarity，那既然这样，为什么这个advise会让人surprise呢？还是不通。不过相比较其他几项略好些。应该没有正确答案。再说其实从文中推不到E这个结论，没有直接的逻辑联系。

Raymond_GMAT

真是很苦恼啊，“似乎”读懂了，也还是三个题都做错。

ceecn2000

这文真恶心，

ceecn2000

不好意思翻老帖子了，这个文章似乎是有问题的，我在网上找到这个版本，说是OG的
In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter. In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech. In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions.

Du Bois’ wartime position thus reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ journalists with censorship if they continue to voice grievances. Furthermore, contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances. Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.

这样的话那道主题题就明了了。

Cherry妃

这篇文章实在纠结！！！

克克里斯蒂

不知道这是哪个gwd里的，以前没做过，我觉得这个句子是不是错了：没有主语，断句也不对吧。不过应该是这个意思：这个1918年的editorial不是一个长期目标的改变，而是一个基于现实利益的反应，因为黑人以前通过在战争中的付出得到了更多法律和政治权利。
(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
Bois老兄的行径：
1895：支持温和派的W
1903：支持激进派的T，因为T和他讲了W的行径
1918：也就是本文讨论的这个时期，bois又支持温和政策，因为the past war taught him that AA could get legal and political advances if they contributed
1918后：文章结尾再次揭露bois老兄的多变，因为战争中的歧视问题，他又要return fighting
所以，
A：说"一贯"反对是错的，bois是个来回变的人，1918editorial只是他上一个阶段反对的（1903－1918）
B：说1918editorial是bois和激进派的妥协，显然说反了，1918E是接近温和派观点的。
C：说这是bois长期目标的改变，显然这位老兄从来没有什么长期目标。
D：说1918E是军队中歧视问题的产物。也是错的。军队中的歧视问题是在1918E之后发生的。正是因为军中歧视问题，使bois从他1918E的观点又转向激进派。
E：应的就是我说有问题的那句话。bois从以前的经验中得出，在这个时局下黑人放弃国内斗争，和白人共赴国难，能给黑人带来政治和法律上的好处。这就是他这个strategy的pragmatic之处
选E

-- by 会员 philikittist (2004/11/28 14:34:00)

我肿么觉得答案是C呢

C.It represented a significant redefinition of the long-term goals Du Bois held prior to the war.
回归到原文：reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure:我觉得这个貌似残缺的句子应该是指着其上文Du Bosi观点在1903年发生改变说的。
也就是说Du Bosi的观点虽然在Washington和Trotter之间摇摆不定，但是他的long-term goal从未曾改变过，只是迫于现实会在不同情况下选择更实际的那个观点。

E.It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars. 如果说对应原文Furthermore, Du Bois believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances. 那么E中的because of表达的因果关系从原文哪里能看出来呢？毕竟是according to the passage题目，没道理答案中很关键的因果关系在文章中都找不到吧。

谁能给我讲讲么？

克克里斯蒂

不好意思翻老帖子了，这个文章似乎是有问题的，我在网上找到这个版本，说是OG的
In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists such as William Trotter. In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech. In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions.

Du Bois’ wartime position thus reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ journalists with censorship if they continue to voice grievances. Furthermore, contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances. Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.

这样的话那道主题题就明了了。

-- by 会员 ceecn2000 (2011/6/8 3:51:58)

这样我就懂啦，Q25确实应该选E
C. 我之前把redefinition理解错了。。。。应该是“重新定义”的意思哦 跟原文矛盾啦
E. 中的because of 因果关系我也找到了
第二段原文：Du Bois’ wartime position thus reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government
officials had threatened African Americans’ journalists with censorship if they
continue to voice grievances. Furthermore, contributions to past war efforts had
brought them some legal and political advances.
第一句主干是wartime position reflected...a pragmatic respoonse. 也就是对采取该
position原因的解释。接下来Furthermore,连接的内容进一步说明对采取该position原因
的解释。

做错了不能怪我们，是GWD原文出现了问题嘛

sfps01

受教了~

channel006

文章中心：BIO是个矛盾的领导人（两头倒）
思路： 按开篇顺寻１９１８年，开篇说BIO 提出观点，让黑人怎么怎么样，however，他之前并不是这么想的，从１８９５年开始，文章中间接着说，BIO怎么在Ｗ和Ｔ之间动摇和改变，的，所以最后ＢＩＯ又变了，即回归开头１９１８。所以第一题　一个关键词就是ｒｅｄｅｆｉｎｉｔｉｏｎ。表示　“又”  符合作者对BIO同志的表述

371989728

全错了！