ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sereny
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GDW24-25

[复制链接]
61#
发表于 2008-12-15 18:58:00 | 只看该作者
原来是借助变来变去讲一个观点啊 厉害!!
62#
发表于 2009-1-15 19:34:00 | 只看该作者
好文!前辈们分析的透彻!
63#
发表于 2009-3-11 18:54:00 | 只看该作者

GWD24-passage three
            
Du Bois在一战前后的政治立场(黑人领袖墙头草)难!

In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter. In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for (20) political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech. In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions,(30)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened.
            African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances. Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of(/on?) systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.

Du Bois在一战前后的观点变来变去。

1918DB反对黑人惹事生非,令众人吃惊,因为他们以为他一向和妥协家W作对。其实DB经常在W派和T派间摇摆。在1895W叫黑人多改善自身社区不要反对歧视的时候,DB是称赞他的。到1903DB又反对W了,不是因为异见,而是因为听到W压制黑人媒体。这反映了他是因应政府施加的社会压力而改变立场的。黑人的努力改善了自身法律政治地位。DB最后因为知道黑人在军队里受到歧视,再次支持黑人起来战斗。

 

 

我的理解

文章脉络比较复杂,我一直把Washington 当成地点来看了,难怪理解偏差。、原来这个DB是个现实派,才会左右摇摆。看图更清晰:

 

T (对抗派强人)       DB(墙头草)             W(妥协派龟孙子)

                                                                                    1895 表扬W

1903T  联盟

                                                                                    1918号召战争时与白人合作

1918之后号召反对

军队对黑人歧视

 

24-25: According to the passage, which of the following is true of the strategy that Du Bois’ 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War?

A) It was a strategy that Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past.

反着说,In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter.

 

B) It represented a compromise between Du Bois’ own views and those of Trotter.

无关。1918的事情与T无关,张冠李戴。   原文说的是:The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington.

 

C) It represented a significant redefinition of the long-term goals Du Bois held prior to the war.

无关。上下乱窜 & 发着说,这个long-term goals
        
是后半段说的,前面1918的时候没提到:

reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response

 

D) It was advocated by Du Bois in response to his recognition of the discrimination faced by African Americans during the war.

无关。上下乱窜,这是最后一句话说的后来的事情,在文章结尾处,直接排除。

E) It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.

排除前面4个后,我也很困惑,E 为什么对?这个E里说的内容是文章结尾处说的?貌似与1918无关?
        
感觉第30句后的句子与前一句接不上,是不是这个考试文章弄来的时候少了几句话?

 

24-26: The passage is primarily concerned with

A) identifying historical circumstances that led Du Bois to alter his long-term goals.

反着说,原文说此人没有long-term goals

B) defining “accommodationism” and showing how Du Bois used this strategy to achieve certain goals.

无中生有

C) accounting for a particular position adopted by Du Bois during the First World War.

文章一直都在说这个人变来变去。

D) contesting the view that Du Bois was significantly influenced by either Washington or Trotter.

没说受谁的影响,无中生有

E) assessing the effectiveness of a strategy that Du Bois urged African Americans to adopt.

没说effectiveness,无中生有

 

24-27: The passage indicates which of the following about Du Bois’ attitude toward Washington?

A) It underwent a shift during the First World War as Du Bois became more sympathetic with Trotter’s views.

一战时的事情与T无关,无中生有。

B) It underwent a shift in 1903 for reasons other than Du Bois’ disagreement with Washington’s accommodationist views.

1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions,

原文同义改写。

C) It underwent a shift as Du Bois make a long-term commitment to the strategy of accommodation.

反着说,DB这个人根本没有长期目标。

D) It remained consistently positive even though Du Bois disagreed with Washington’s efforts to control the African American press.

反着说。实际情况是:1903站到T一起,反对W

E) It was shaped primarily by Du Bois’ appreciation of Washington’s pragmatic approach to the advancement of the interests of African Americans.

张冠李戴,pragmatic
        
原文第一次出现的时候是来说DB的,在后半段靠近结尾的地方:

reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened

心得:看到一个关键词/中心词,一定回原文看这个词第一次出现的位置,否则很可能是张冠李戴的迷惑选项!

64#
发表于 2009-9-10 10:35:00 | 只看该作者

楼上太强了,赞!

65#
发表于 2010-4-4 17:05:24 | 只看该作者
谢谢LSS!
66#
发表于 2010-5-27 20:10:42 | 只看该作者
但是还有一个疑问就是,在讲1903:支持激进派的T,因为T和他讲了W的行径这个change 后,哪里看出来它后面讲的又是 1918年的行为了啊?我一开始读上去还以为文章的内容是以1918年的一个政策改变引出bois是个善变的人以及他的种种变化。请问从哪看出后面还是回归到1918年去了啊?
-- by 会员 pensi_112 (2008/11/22 15:39:00)



同问。

而且我的原文是这个样子的。
In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions. reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure: government officials had threatened African American journalists with censorship if they continued to voice grievances. Furthermore, Du Bois believed that African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances. Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.
67#
发表于 2010-10-1 11:01:21 | 只看该作者

24-26: The passage is primarily concerned with

A) identifying historical circumstances that led Du Bois to alter his long-term goals.

反着说,原文说此人没有long-term goals

B) defining “accommodationism” and showing how Du Bois used this strategy to achieve certain goals.

无中生有

C) accounting for a particular position adopted by Du Bois during the First World War.

文章一直都在说这个人变来变去。

D) contesting the view that Du Bois was significantly influenced by either Washington or Trotter.

没说受谁的影响,无中生有

E) assessing the effectiveness of a strategy that Du Bois urged African Americans to adopt.

没说effectiveness,无中生有

-- by 会员 中国故乡的云 (2009/3/11 18:54:00)




我觉得应该选D!

C) accounting for a particular position adopted by Du Bois during the First World War.

文章一直都在说这个人变来变去<----正是这句解释跟A PARTICULAR POSITION(一个确定的立场)矛盾。
就算尽管选项把时间范围限定在during the First WW (1914-1918),而文章的最开头也确实说他在这期间有一个确定的立场,但是后面大篇幅的都是在说他在更大的时间范围内怎么怎么样倒来倒去,所以不能说这个选项是全文主旨。

D) contesting the view that Du Bois was significantly influenced by either Washington or Trotter.
没说受谁的影响,无中生有

文中说了他是在这两个人中间倒来倒去{
shifted positions along thecontinuum between W and T} 也具了例子说一会儿他受W的影响这样了(1895),一会儿受T影响那样了(1903)。所以说他significantly influenced by 这两个人完全不过分。
另:我觉得contesting的意思其实就跟general的arguing, evaluating差不多


68#
发表于 2010-10-14 14:27:59 | 只看该作者
GWD的东西,哎,有时候不知道怎么说,觉得有些答案和选项确实会引起较大的争论,我纠结了好久了,C和D还是……
69#
发表于 2010-11-15 11:24:16 | 只看该作者
最后一句:Upon learning of systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.
文章开始时1918年,然后从1895年开始,一直走到1903年,Du Bois学了些这方面的事件,他做出了该文章开头他提出的strategy。。。
70#
发表于 2010-12-26 11:49:21 | 只看该作者
这篇文章运用了倒叙插叙的手法。。。1918声明的原因其实有两个,一个是social pressure, 另一个就是他认为African amarican 战争时做得贡献使他们权利方面得到提升(选项D)。(原文Reflectied not...到... political advances)
表述完之后又接着说此人1918之后的变。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 10:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部