kchszy061ban的作业贴

kchszy061ban

TPO 15     6 30

In the reading text,the author offers three ways to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia. While,the professor in the lecture believe that those methods could not help to get rid of the cane toad,even worse,they may cause unwanted damages.

First,the professor points out that national fence is not an effective ways to prevent to stop the spread. The reason is that there always rivers and streams flow through on side of the fence to the other side of it. Thus,the water can carry young toad and toad eggs,thus they can get through the fence and continue their spreading. Therefore,the assertion in the reading text is weakened.

Second,the professor states that a massive of volunteers indeed can trap and capture cane toad,but the disadvantage is that the untrained volunteers would also kill other frogs and other species,because it is very difficulty to distingish cane toad from others especially when they are young. And some of the native frogs and similar species are in-danger. So,the measure in the reading text may not work at all.

Third,the professor argues that using virus is a bad idea because they could cause damages to the cane toad in their native region. Because the reptile and amphibian species could easily transport to other places. Thus,when they arrive at cane toad's origional places,the cane toad there would be killed in large amount,this would cause damage to the whole ecosystem because cane toad is a native specie there. Thus,this method is totally disputed.

kchszy061ban

6月30日Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is often not a good thing to move to a new city or a new country because of the loss of old friends.


When it comes to the question of whether it is a good thing to move a new city or a new country,each of us place different weight on various factors and may consider certaion phase of career planning at different time. Some people would like to choose live in the same place throughout their life bbecause of their concern of the loss of old firends,while others prefer to experience new things and always want to enjoy a new environment. Considering my own experience and what I learnt from my friends,I believe that it is indeed a good thing to move to a new city or a new country. And I will list my reasons as follows.

To begain with,moving to new places does not means the loss of old firends,even better,it can help us to make new friends. With the rapid develop of communication technology,people nowadays can connect with their friend with cell phones,Internet,and various transportations also can help people move from one place to anther within only a few hours. So,moving to a new place does not means the loss of old friends. Meanwhile,the new environment can give people the opportunities to make new friends,as time passes,these new friends will become old friends for people too.

Moreover,moving to a different place far from people' hometown can give them a broad understanding of the society and different perspective about their own life. They can enjoy a different culture and lifestyle which is may strange to them at the begainning,but as time moves on,they will become familiar with the new environment. Then people know something new to them,this obviously can help them to expand their horizon. Take my experience as an example,when I left my hometown and went to university,I felt all the things around me were so different,and missed my home and my old friends there. While,just one year later,I began to adapt to the school campous and felt confortable to live there. I shared my experiences with my old friends,they all said it was interesting,and they wanted to move to a new places just as me.

Finally,if people stay in one place,they will lose the chances to improve themselves,which are very important for their further development. Nowadays,the society is changing quilkly beyond people' imagination. In order to adapt to the always changing society,it is necessary for people to have the experience of living in a entirely new place. One of my friend once had an opportunity to study abroad,but his parents did not want him to be so far away from them,and they worried about the safe siturtion there,also,there were no friends there could help him. My friend,who also did not want to lose his old friend in my hometown,decided to stay at my hometown. However,years later,when he had an opportunity to promotion,he found that he did not meet the requrement,which stated that one need to have the experience of studying abroad in order to fit the position. As you can see,what a pity that he did not grasp the oppotunity years before.

Of course,live in the place where we were born means that we know all of the other people deeply,this makes us feel harmony and give us a great sense of belonging. However,based on what I have been discussed above,it is safe to say that moving on to a new city or country is better for ourselves and does not mean the loss of old friends.
超时四分钟，罪过罪过。

kchszy061ban

7月1日Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Rather than help their children do schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do work independently. Do you agree or disagree?

When it comes to the question of whether parents should help their children with their schoolwork,each of us place different weight on various factors and may consider certaion phase of educate children at different time. Some people would like to help their children for the reason that they can finish their schoolwork quickly and then have spare time to do other important things. While others,on the contrary,hold different opinion,they believe it is good for their children to work out their homework all on their own,and learn how to solve the difficulties by themselves. According to my own experience and what I had learnt from people whihc I familar with,I agree with the later choice,and will list my explainations as follow.

To begain with,some can help child cultivate independence at early time in their life,wich may benefit them when they grow up. When children doing schoolwork on their own,their need to finish what they can do,and then search for information to solve some difficult which they could not deal with them all on their own. By doing this,children' independence could be cultivated. One of my friends always chooses to let his son finish all the schoolwork by himself,whehter it is about mathemtics or physics,and evne some more hard courses. His son is really independent by his farther's trainning,most of the assignments become easy for him,he indeed need extra help with some question,but he know how to search relate information through Inernet or other experts. Thus,he becomes interest in solve problems,and enjoy the process of doing them. Later his son get a reward of national maths contest,which his father never had done before. As you can see,it really help for children to finish schoolwork on their own efforts.

Moreover,solving problems on their own help children foster their creative thinking abilty. If parents tell their children what to do step by step to work out schoolwork,it would establish a formlua for children when they confront with other questions. They will use what they learnt from their parents to solve questins they face,this will do harm to their creative thinking ability. While,by solving problems on their own,they need to create some solutions to the problems without help from their parents. When I was little,I ofthen asked my father to help me when I have some hard questions. Later,when I went to high school which was far away from my home,I could not ask my farther any more. Then it took me a long time to deal with schoolwork all on my own,but later,I began to create new methods to deal with them,even better,I tried to understand the knowledge in a different ways from what my teachers said,and pointed out some mistake they made in classes. This experience really help me to form my creative thinking ability.

Finally,parents' experience are correct sometime and they have the time and patience to help their children,but it not to say that they will never make any mistakes. So in order to make less mistakes by themselves,it is better for children solve problem on their own,thus when they make some mistakes ,they will know how to deal with them. Parents' knowledge are limited,they lack some current information to solve some special questions in their children' schoolwork,sometimes they may give to wrong answer. A primary student I know once ask her parents a question about English,but her parents never learn English before,thus they can not help.

Of course,with the help of parents,children could solve problems quickly and crrectly most of the time,and some parents are willing to help their children train creative thinking ability too. However,under these conditions,children can easily develop dependence on their parents,this is harmful for their future life and study. Thus,based on what had been discussed above,I firmly believe that it is better for children sovle their own problems.

kchszy061ban

TPO 16 综合

The reading text talks about the tough situation of the archaeology in the U.K during most of the twentieth century. While the professor states in the lecture that in 1990 the United Kingdom establish a new guildeline,which would change and improve the situation in all the three areas mentioned in the reading text.

First,as the professor says in the lecture,the new guildeline states that before any contruction sites begain,they must be examined by archaeologists first. If something valueable can be found,then the archaeologists,the local government and the construction company get together to make a plan to preserve the valuable sites. They may construct around the sites or excavate them. So,the valuable sites could be preserved,this is the change relates to the first area in the reading text.

Second,provision in the new guildeline says that any work done for sites will be paid by the contruction company. Thus,this new financial support from the company would allow archaeologists do more researches than in the past. This is the second change relates to the reading text,which states that many archaeologists lack fianncial support.

Third,government now create many paid jobs for archaeologists in all stages of the process. They can work to draw plans,collect datas and write articles about archaeology. This helps increase position for many professional archaeologists,and the number of them is the highest than any other time. This is the third change.

包子不包子

TPO 16 综合

The reading text talks about the tough situation of the archaeology in the U.K during most of the twentieth century. While the professor states in the lecture that in 1990 the United Kingdom establish a new guildeline,which would change and improve the situation in all the three areas mentioned in the reading text.

First,as the professor says in the lecture,the new guildeline states that before any contruction sites begain,they must be examined by archaeologists first. If something valueable can be found,then the archaeologists,the local government and the construction company will get together to make a plan to preserve the valuable sites. They may construct around the sites or excavate them. So,the valuable sites could be preserved,this is the change relates to the first area in the reading text.

Second,provision in the new guildeline says that any work done for sites will be paid by the contruction company. Thus,this new financial support from the company would allow archaeologists do more researches than in the past. This is the second change relates to the reading text,which states that many archaeologists lack fianncial support.

Third,government now create many paid jobs for archaeologists inat all stages of the process. They can work to draw plans,collect datas and write articles about archaeology. This helps increase position for many professional archaeologists,and the number of them is the highest than any other time. This is the third change.

已经很好了 但是感觉在段尾的总结this is the third change this is the change relates to... 有些单薄 改改就好
不错的文章了~

包子不包子

7月1日Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Rather than help their children do schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do work independently. Do you agree or disagree?

When it comes to the question of whether parents should help their children with their schoolwork,each of us place different weight on various factors and may consider certaion phase of educate children at different time. Some people would like to help their children for the reason that they can finish their schoolwork quickly and then have spare time to do other important things. While others,on the contrary,hold different opinion,they believe it is good for their children to work out their homework all on their own,and learn how to solve the difficulties by themselves. According to my own experience and what I had learnt from people whihc  which I familar with,I agree with the later choice,and will list my explainations as follow.

To begain with,some can help child cultivate independence at early time in their life,wich may benefit them when they grow up. When children doing schoolwork on their own,their they need to finish what they can do,and then search for information to solve some difficult which they could not deal with them all on their own. By doing this,children' independence could be cultivated. One of my friends always chooses to let his son finish all the schoolwork by himself,whehter it is about mathemtics or physics,and evne some more hard courses. His son is really independent by his farther's trainning,most of the assignments become easy for him,he indeed need extra help with some question,but he knows how to search relate information through the Inernet or other experts. Thus,he becomes interest in solve problems,and enjoy the process of doing them. Later his son get a reward of national maths contest,which his father never had done before. As you can see,it really help for children to finish schoolwork on their own efforts.

Moreover,solving problems on their own help children foster their creative thinking abilty. If parents tell their children what to do step by step to work out schoolwork,it would establish a formlua for children when they confront with other questions. They will use what they learnt from their parents to solve questins they face,this will do harm to their creative thinking ability. While,by solving problems on their own,they need to create some solutions to the problems without help from their parents. When I was little,I ofthen asked my father to help me when I havehad some hard questions. Later,when I went to high school which was far away from my home,I could not ask my farther any more. Then it took me a long time to deal with schoolwork all on my own,but later,I began to create new methods to deal with them,even better,I tried to understand the knowledge in a different ways from what my teachers said,and pointed out some mistakes they made in classes. This experience really help me to form my creative thinking ability.

Finally,parents' experience are correct sometime and they have the time and patience to help their children,but it does not to say that they will never make any mistakes. So in order to make less mistakes by themselves,it is better for children solve problem on their own,thus when they make some mistakes ,they will know how to deal with them. Parents' knowledge are limited,they lack some current information to solve some special questions in their children' schoolwork,sometimes they may give to wrong answer. A primary student I know once ask her parents a question about English,but her parents never learn English before,thus they can not help. 时态

Of course,with the help of parents,children could solve problems quickly and crrectly most of the time,and some parents are willing to help their children train creative thinking ability too. However,under these conditions,children can easily develop dependence on their parents,this is harmful for their future life and study. Thus,based on what had been discussed above,I firmly believe that it is better for children sovle their own problems.

就是细节问题了
句型有些单一了 所以感觉例子叙述有些长 可以适当换些词

kchszy061ban

TPO 17 综合

In the reading text,the author writes about several reasons that birds will contiune to decline in the Uniterd States. However, this is being argued in the lecture. The professor in the lecture says that the claims in the reading text are unconvincing,and she gives her reasons in the lecture.

First,the professor admits that human development indeed cause the decline of some types of birds,but it also increases certain types of birds like doves,sea dogs and so forth,even hawks are flying around the cities to pray on these birds. The residents even complains that there so many birds in the street. So,this is directly contrary to what had been worte in the reading text.

Second,the professor points out that argiculture is increasing,but it needs less and less extra land every year. The reason is that new crops which can produce more products every unit land are created. They could produce more food in the land which already exsist,thus,it is no need to convert the wild land. The second explaination in the reading passage is disputed.

Third,people nowadays begain to aware of the influence of traditional pesticides on birds. Therefore,two methods are used to decrease this bad effect. The first one is to use pesticides which are less toxic,in order to not hurt the birds. Second,new crops which have resistance to pests are invented. All these will help to reduce harm to birds. Thus,the decline predicted in the reading text would not happen according to the professor.

瓜瓜不瓜

TPO 15 6 30  红色为错误 蓝色为建议 紫色总评

In the reading text,the author offers three ways to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia. While,the professor in the lecture believe that those methods could not help to get rid of the cane toad,even worse,they may cause unwanted damages.

First,the professor points out that national fence is not an effective ways to prevent to stop the spread. The reason is that there always rivers and streams flow through on side of the fence to the other side of it. Thus,the water can carry young toad and toad eggs,thus they can get through the fence and continue their spreading. Therefore,the assertion in the reading text is weakened.

Second,the professor states that a massive of volunteers indeed can trap and capture cane toad,but the disadvantage is that the untrained volunteers would also kill other frogs and other species,because it is very difficulty to distingish cane toad from others especially when they are young. And some of the native frogs and similar species are in-danger. So,the measure in the reading text may not work at all.

Third,the professor argues that using virus is a bad idea because they could cause damages to the cane toad in their native region. Because the reptile and amphibian species could （+be）easily transport (+ed)to other places. Thus,when they arrive at cane toad's origional places,the cane toad there would be killed in large amount,this would cause damage to the whole ecosystem because cane toad is a native specie there. Thus,this method is totally disputed.(native place 是South America,要是能写出来更好了)


K同学写的很好，段落上是ETS喜欢的表述方式，要点听得也很全。要是能加一个结尾就更好了！

kchszy061ban

7月2日Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents should help children to do their work or encourage children to do their work indecently.

When it comes to the question of whether parents should help their children with their work,each of us place different weight on various factors and may consider certaion phase of educating children at different time. Some people would like to help their children for the reason that they can finish their work quickly and then have spare time to do other important things. While others,on the contrary,hold different opinion,they believe it is good for their children to work out their homework all on their own,and learn how to solve the difficulties by themselves. According to my own experience and what I had learnt from people which I familar with,I am against the above statement,and will list my explainations as follow.

To begain with,children may dependend on their parents to find all solutions of their problems if parents always help them. This would cause their children can not solve problems when they deal with them all on their own. From the time when I was a child growing up in my hometown,I loved working out problems on my own. On the contrary,my friend Mike always asked his farther when he confronted with some difficulties. Every tiem our teacher gave us some homework,he was usually the first one to finish them and the answers were all correct. All of us was surprised about his talent. But,when at the end of the term,we needed to take a text,his score was very low compared to me. Then I knew that the his father told him the answers of our homework,but he could not predict the question in our text,so,Mike failed in the text. As you can see,parents' help is not always benefitial.

Moreover,if parents often make their children rely on them,their children' chances to contact with other people such as their teachers,classmates and friends will reduce. It is natural for children to choose the easy ways when they want to solve a problem. So,if their parents always want to help them,this would give children a signal that when they want to solve some question,asking their parents is the quick solution. Therefore,their time and opportunity to contact with other people would be reduced.

Finally,if parents encourage their children to do their work indecently,then,the consequence may be very severe. The purpose of give work to children is to help them improve their ability. The equal important object is that they also need to finish their work in proper way. If they just copy their classmates or do this when they take a test,teachers will punish them. If children did not know this point when they were young,they would continue their improper way when they grow up. While the law is strict,they will be put into prison if they do some work indecently.

Of course,with the help of parents,children could solve problems quickly and crrectly most of the time,and some parents are willing to help their children train creative thinking ability too. However,under these conditions,children can easily develop dependence on their parents,this is harmful for their future study and work. Also,things become even worse if children do their work indcently. Thus,based on what had been discussed above,I firmly believe that it is better for children to problems independently.

kchszy061ban

TPO 18 综合

In the reading text,the author offers threes ways to address the decline of Torreya. While,the professor in the lecture states that these methods unfortunitely could not provide satisfactory solutions to the situation. She lists her explainations one by one according to the reading text.

First,the professor argues that the micorclimate in the northern part of Florida had already changed becaues of the larger climate changes such as global warming. Also,most of the wetland in Florida had been drained out. Thus,the climate there has becomes drier. So,this is directly contradict to its counterpart in the reading passage.

Second,the professor points out that another tree called black oak-which had been moved to a different place before. The result was that this tree wiped out other trees which were native to that region and were already in-danger or becaming extinct. Therefore,the effect of moving Torreya to other place is unpredictable. It may cause bad effect to local ecosystem.

Third,the solution to preserve Torreya in research centers also has its disadvantage,according to the professor. One chanllenge is diseases. Wild trees are geneticaly various because they are in large amount,thus they have resistance to different diseases. While,it is obvious that research centers do not have enough space to keep large amount of Torreya. They can easily be damaged by certain diseases. So,the last method in the reading text is disputed.