- UID
- 717474
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-2-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
TPO18综合
The reading passage advocates three ways to address the decline of Torreya and the lecture deals with the same topic. However, the professor thinks the three ways mentioned in the reading migh (might) be unsuccessful in preventing the extinction of Torreya.
In the first place, the reading suggest a (an) option of reestablishing Torreya in the same location in Northern Florida with the favorable microclimate. However, the professor refutes (refues) this option by suggesting that the microclimate in Northern Florida is drier and no longer fit (fits) for the growth of Torreya as a result of global warming and wetlands. So the first option is not desirable.(感觉可以多用些复杂句为自己加分)
Secondly, according to the reading, it might be a good option to move Toreya to a different location via the process of assisted migration. The lecturer opposes this option by introducing the example of the migration of Blacklocust. The migration of Blacklocust causes the death of other endangered trees and the professor concludes that the same practice of migrating Torreya might incur unpredicted outcomes.
Last but not least, instead of suggesting that to preserve Torreya in research centers, (妹子你这个举的例子有些简单)the professor points out that the research certers (centers) might not hold the diverse population of Torreya in case of potential diseases.(希望多提些听力中的内容,毕竟你的总体字数太少了)
In conclusion, the professor uses vivid examples and convincing points to disprove the feasibility of three options discussed in the reading passage.
再接再厉吧!
|
|