GWD9-27

leo2523754

这题我选A,因为我觉得could probably两个词不能连用,因为都有表示可能的意思,请NN们指正,谢谢!

guolulu526

这题我不觉得是在考平行结构, 因为原文Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planetwide destruction.

如果这里用and if that, 就变成an asteroid that is about half a mile wide and that, if it were to strike...

第二个THAT 引导的从句是个什么成分啊? 不会是在解释ASTEROID 的具体内容吧??

所以我个人支持A. To be discussed...

aiaidi

不能是.....identified an asteroid ... and (indentified) that, if it strikes Earth, it can....吗？

kiki_zhang

我觉得分析这个句子，还可以和横线后面的句子联系起来看。

E 选项：and that, if it strikes Earth, it could experience a tremendous amount of damage but probably not cause planetwide destruction.

experience 和cause两者并列让人觉得怪怪的。

C选项： and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would probably not cause planetwide destruction.

do damage to 和cause 并列感觉要好一些。

大家认为呢？

skyalan

我像知道D为什么不对，仅仅因为倒装么

C我看着挺别扭的

waitingtoexhale

我做题的时候也选了A，但当时就觉得A没有表达出虚拟语气，好像不是很妥。但当时总觉得and后面的that不能和前面平行（也不知当时为什么这么感觉）

现在仔细分析了一下，的确C应该是对的。

Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and that, （if it were to strike Earth,） could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would probably not cause planetwide destruction.

个人觉得，在这里if it were to strike Earth更像是一个插入语，identified an asteroid that……and that….这是一个完美的平行，在后面一个that引导的从句中，that指代an asteroid，所以任何could和would前面的it都是多余的。

zhaoshujuanw

I also chose A at first.But now I think C is right.

楼上的分析有道理。A:Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planetwide destruction.中

Scientists have identified -----that----and，----it can-------，结构不平行。

howru

问几个愚蠢的问题:

----------

1. Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and

这个 that 引导的是定语从句吗? 倘若是, 应该是非限定性从句吧, 那不时应该用 which 吗?

2. 不少 XDJM 选C, Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would.    那第2个 that 引导的是什么从句呢?   肯定不是定语, 那到底是什么呢?

-----------

同样有关 that 定从的例子,  GWD-8 阅读 25-28 的原句:

Clark believes this possibility has been obscured by the recent sociological fashion, exemplified by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery reflects social (20) choices.

"that" 引导的应该是非限定性定从吧? 为什么不用 which?  

困惑中, 盼望指点.. 谢谢!  

cicilla

一个小教训：我一下就排除了C,因为XDF老师告诉我们：be to do sth, be going to do sth都是口语表达，必错！

看来考试的时候，要用到什么什么必错的规则的时候，一定要到最后才可以用啊，否则吃亏吃大了。

ya-ya

以下是引用howru在2005-1-16 11:59:00的发言：

1. Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and

这个 that 引导的是定语从句吗? 倘若是, 应该是非限定性从句吧, 那不时应该用 which 吗?

2. 不少 XDJM 选C, Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would.    那第2个 that 引导的是什么从句呢?   肯定不是定语, 那到底是什么呢?

-----------

同样有关 that 定从的例子,  GWD-8 阅读 25-28 的原句:

Clark believes this possibility has been obscured by the recent sociological fashion, exemplified by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery reflects social (20) choices.

"that" 引导的应该是非限定性定从吧? 为什么不用 which?  

同样的疑问.

有关两个定语从句并列的在GWD逻辑中有这样的句子:

A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company’s warranty.  The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory.  When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.
也是两个that从句并列修饰level, 为什么中间没有加and呢?

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-15 11:25:38编辑过]