ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: yangtingno1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-1-3, GWD-1-22.

[复制链接]
41#
发表于 2006-9-26 20:30:00 | 只看该作者
保存37楼的分析到文档了,so N!
42#
发表于 2006-12-5 16:25:00 | 只看该作者
 Q22:

City Official: At City
            Hospital
, uninsured patients tend to have shorter stays and fewer procedures performed than do insured patients, even though insured patients, on average, have slightly less serious medical problems at the time of admission to the hospital than uninsured patients have. Critics of the hospital have concluded that the uninsured patients are mot receiving proper medical care. However, this conclusion is almost certainly false. Careful investigation has recently shown two things: insured patients have much longer stays in the hospital than necessary, and they tend to have more procedures performed than are medically necessary.

In the city official’s argument, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first states the conclusion of the city official’s argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.

B. The first is used to support the conclusion of the city official’s argument; the second states that conclusion.

C. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second states the position that the city official’s argument opposes.

D. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second provides support for the conclusion of the city official’s argument.

E. The first states the position that the city official’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the city official’s argument.

我觉得这题不选E的~~Critics of the hospital have concluded that the uninsured patients are mot receiving proper medical care. However, this conclusion is almost certainly false.
    

however后面的this conclusion is almost certainly false. 是反对Critics of the hospital ,因为在this conclusion is almost certainly false. 后面说了insured patients have much longer stays in the hospital than necessary也就是说并不是因为uninsured patient没有得到适当的治疗,而是说insured patient做了不必要的治疗,在这里insured patient做了不必要的治疗并不能推出the uninsured patients are mot receiving proper medical care.这可是GMAT逻辑的特点呢~~所以第二个BF是反对Critics of the hospital 的,因为选项里没有反对critics of the hospital所以就选Dsupport for the conclusion of the city official’s argument.

43#
发表于 2006-12-5 16:31:00 | 只看该作者

不好意思~~看错选项了~~还是应该选E的,D的两个BF的解释都说不同,D中队第一个的解释The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics;提干中只是得到了结论,并不是support结论。D中的第二个解释the second provides support for the conclusion of the city official’s argument. 再提提干中的第一句话:City Official: At City
        Hospital, uninsured patients tend to have shorter stays and fewer procedures performed than do insured patients, even though insured patients, on average, have slightly less serious medical problems at the time of admission to the hospital than uninsured patients have. 只是一段可观的数据,并没有得出什么结论~~所以第二个BF不是support结论~~

不过我上面的推理过程足以把C推翻了~~~

44#
发表于 2007-4-25 20:28:00 | 只看该作者

Q22

首先要看明白题干引用的是 City Official  所说的话 !(第二个BF也是从City Official 口中说出的!)

然后搞清楚原题(题干)要表达的意思。

第一个BF指City Official 所要反对的论点(从第二个BF判断的),即Critics提出的 没有保险的人没有受到应有的

医疗,第二个BF指出的是City Official的论点,即不是 没有保险的人没有受到应有的医疗 ,而是

有保险的人受了过多的治疗,受的过多的医疗才是不合适的,所以会让人产生受到较少医疗就是不

合适的误解。即不能用受的治疗量的多少来判断所受的治疗是否是合适的。
     也就是说 City Official 认为 没有保险的人接受的医疗量是合适的,受保险的接受了过多的

医疗;而Critics认为 没有保险的人接受的医疗量偏少,是不合适的;受保险的接受的是正常量的

医疗。
     读明白了提再看选项:
     D 两个BF都是 结论 不是 结论不能支持自己(结论),所以D错。
     C 第一个BF同上,第二BF个如果读明白题,显然可以判断出错了。

显然我的智商也不高......只能理解到这种程度了......

45#
发表于 2007-7-4 17:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用gigiga0118在2005-7-22 22:46:00的发言:

D.      The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second provides support for the conclusion of the city official’s argument.

我覺得D也說的通阿

第一個boldface提供了批評者的結論

第二個boldface提供了official的看法

如何排除D???


TO这位朋友

关键是support是指“支持”,含有加强的意思,而此文BF部分不是“支持、加强”,指示state

46#
发表于 2007-8-28 10:56:00 | 只看该作者
37 !!!
47#
发表于 2007-9-13 11:57:00 | 只看该作者

哈哈.原来如此.

我题目就看错了.一直以为前面是official说的话. 后面是critics的话. 其实从头到尾都是official的说话. 这样一来结论就很明显了. E.

以下是引用bigmachine在2007-4-25 20:28:00的发言:

Q22

首先要看明白题干引用的是 City Official  所说的话 !(第二个BF也是从City Official 口中说出的!)

然后搞清楚原题(题干)要表达的意思。

第一个BF指City Official 所要反对的论点(从第二个BF判断的),即Critics提出的 没有保险的人没有受到应有的

医疗,第二个BF指出的是City Official的论点,即不是 没有保险的人没有受到应有的医疗 ,而是

有保险的人受了过多的治疗,受的过多的医疗才是不合适的,所以会让人产生受到较少医疗就是不

合适的误解。即不能用受的治疗量的多少来判断所受的治疗是否是合适的。
     也就是说 City Official 认为 没有保险的人接受的医疗量是合适的,受保险的接受了过多的

医疗;而Critics认为 没有保险的人接受的医疗量偏少,是不合适的;受保险的接受的是正常量的

医疗。
     读明白了提再看选项:
     D 两个BF都是 结论 不是 结论不能支持自己(结论),所以D错。
     C 第一个BF同上,第二BF个如果读明白题,显然可以判断出错了。

显然我的智商也不高......只能理解到这种程度了......

48#
发表于 2007-12-8 14:31:00 | 只看该作者

这样的解题思路已经是一个很高级的阶段了,不过,似乎应该是这样的!

49#
发表于 2007-12-17 03:04:00 | 只看该作者
mot should be not
50#
发表于 2008-2-8 13:02:00 | 只看该作者
3x
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 17:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部