ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: yangtingno1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-1-3, GWD-1-22.

[复制链接]
61#
发表于 2008-12-18 12:44:00 | 只看该作者

1-3做到第三遍,居然三次都选A

怨念啊!!!

62#
发表于 2009-1-1 22:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Maggieyin在2004-10-27 21:35:00的发言:

to determind:

我的理解是这样,第一句话前有BECAUSE,那么可以认定这句话表示一个原因。第二句话前有BUT,那么可以认定根据这句话推出的内容(结论)和前面的内容有转折,肯定不一致。参照答案,我选B。

我觉得太精辟了!又快又准!堪称做题的想要达到的梦幻高度!
63#
发表于 2009-9-1 19:00:00 | 只看该作者

你好,我想请问下为何我的gwd31套的第1套Q3和这个答案解析对不上呢?

我的题目是这个

For protection from the summer sun, the Mojave lived in open-sided, flat-topped dwellings known as shades, each a roof of poles and arrowweed supported by posts set in a rectangle.

64#
发表于 2009-9-5 18:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Maggieyin在2004/10/27 21:35:00的发言:

to determind:

我的理解是这样,第一句话前有BECAUSE,那么可以认定这句话表示一个原因。第二句话前有BUT,那么可以认定根据这句话推出的内容(结论)和前面的内容有转折,肯定不一致。参照答案,我选B。

这个牛
65#
发表于 2010-6-6 18:28:57 | 只看该作者
Q3:

A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product. But large profits on the mew product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the mew product’s capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.






In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?






A. The first is an assumption that forms the basis for a course of action that the argument criticizes; the second presents the course of action endorsed by the argument.



B. The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the wisdom of adopting that strategy.



C. The first is an assumption that has been used to justify a certain strategy; the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption.



D. The first is a consideration raised in support of a strategy the argument endorses; the second presents grounds in support of that consideration.



E. The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.
一、题干四句话分析如下:
A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. 第一句话,摆出一个事实作为论述的前提。Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product. 第二句话,基于第一句话所论述的前提和本句because后所列的两个考虑因素,得出一个结论:即许多公司采取的一个行动策略。But large profits on the mew product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the mew product’s capabilities. 第三句话,分析指出如果执行上述行动策略,将给公司造成不利。Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price. 第四句话,最后得出一个改进后的行动策略,也即是大结论。
二、选项分析如下:
A. The first is an assumption that forms the basis for a course of action that the argument criticizes; the second presents the course of action endorsed by the argument.     The first 不是 an assumption, 而是对事实的一个判断;The second 没有提出一个行动策略,而是分析前文提出的行动策略将带来的结果。因此本项错。



B. The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the wisdom of adopting that strategy. 本项描述最准确。



C. The first is an assumption that has been used to justify a certain strategy; the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption.     The first 不是 an assumption, 而是对事实的一个判断,其作用也不是去证明某策略的正确,而是作为推出某策略的一个原因;The second 没有质疑 the first 。



D. The first is a consideration raised in support of a strategy the argument endorses; the second presents grounds in support of that consideration.    the argument 并没有 endorses the first 支持的a strategy(即:第二句话的主句);the second 也没有支持 the first。



E. The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.    the first 只是指出第二句中所述行动策略的一个原因,并没有show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect;the second 并没有指出 that strategy(即第二句中的行动策略)的引人之处,而是相反地指出其不利因素。
-- by 会员 chenlong (2006/9/5 11:38:00)

66#
发表于 2011-1-6 10:40:06 | 只看该作者
按c的意思,第一是assumption,第二个反对的还是assumption,但第二个反对的是前面的结论,不是assumption
67#
发表于 2011-4-22 12:12:07 | 只看该作者
谁能告诉我

the appeal of a certain strategy

这个怎么翻译啊?
68#
发表于 2012-9-15 13:58:08 | 只看该作者
可以解释一下GWD3的31题吗?谢谢
69#
发表于 2012-9-15 14:00:24 | 只看该作者
GWD3-Q31:
Although most smoking-related illnesses are caused by inhaling the tar in tobacco smoke, it is addiction to nicotine that prevents most smokers from quitting.  In an effort to decrease the incidence of smoking-related illnesses, lawmaker in Sandonia plan to reduce the average quantity of nicotine per cigarette by half over the next five years. Unfortunately, smokers who are already addicted to nicotine tend to react to such reductions by smoking correspondingly more cigarettes.
The information above most strongly supports which of the following predictions about the effects of implementing the Sandonian government’s plan?
A.  The average quantity of tar inhaled by Sandonian smokers who are currently addicted to nicotine will probably not decrease during the next five years.
B.  Sandonian smokers who are not already addicted to nicotine will probably also begin to smoke more cigarettes during the next five years than they had previously.
C.  The annual number of Sandonian smokers developing smoking-related illnesses will probably decrease during the next five years.
D.  The proportion of Sandonians attempting to quit smoking who succeed in that attempt will probably decrease during the next five years.
E.  The number of Sandonians who quit smoking during the next five years will probably exceed the number who quit during the last five years.
70#
发表于 2013-5-20 10:07:42 | 只看该作者
morgan 发表于 2005-1-6 00:24
Q22:City Official:  At City Hospital, uninsured patients tend to have shorter stays and fe ...

I SEE. THANKS FOR YOUR GOOD EXPLANATION!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 17:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部