ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: cowdoin
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请见置顶帖

[精华] [复制链接]
141#
发表于 2012-2-8 18:58:50 | 只看该作者
顶!
142#
发表于 2012-2-9 14:54:27 | 只看该作者
顶起
143#
发表于 2012-2-10 17:17:43 | 只看该作者
占!!!
144#
发表于 2012-2-10 21:27:50 | 只看该作者
顶~
楼主附件是不是忘记更新了?
145#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-10 21:31:21 | 只看该作者
新文章 没有考古出来 狗主只是说了很general的statement 所以没写
146#
发表于 2012-2-10 21:41:28 | 只看该作者
1.1.16 企业联合模式
V1  【by: sweetsfactory】    (之后的狗主人反映这个版本最清楚)

说企业的两种企业联合模式,具体名字忘记了,其中一个是asset打头的,和物业有关的,反正文章很简单,能读懂。
第一段:有两种企业联合模式,忘记名字,称之为A模式,和B模式
A模式举了个例——航空公司和某牌子合作提供某个牌子的coffee,那个牌子的coffee的chain同样可以收获名气还是什么的,(反正是互利);模式b也举例(就有asset的那个)——一个什么店开在一个什么店旁边,利用其中一个店的丰富客源来为另一个店吸引生意。
第二段:说这两个模式的弊端;A的弊端的是什么不成比例,举例——一个奢华酒店和一个平价酒店合作;B的弊端是...忘记了
考题:1.文章结构/主题——介绍两个模式,说出各自得弊端
2.和模式B相似的事例——我选了什么一个干衣店开在一个busy的mall旁边
3.为什么说一个贵酒店和一个平酒店不能用模式B——不同target 消费群

V2  【by: ——囧——】    

还有一个不太难的是讲合作的。说分为两种合作,brand和asset.简单介绍了后(其实就和字面意思一样)举了个brand的例子先,说是飞机上卖咖啡,可以提高咖啡的知名度神马的。然后又说其实有些unfair的risk在这里。比如没有人会仅因为咖啡不好喝就不坐这个公司的灰机,但是可能会造成对这个咖啡很不好的口碑。后面接着讲asset合作的公司。举了个例子说是一个高级宾馆什么的和一个barget饭馆合作显然是不会很成功的。(此处好像有题会问,忘了是什么了。。)然后解释说这个asset合作的risk怎么怎么的。

V3  【by: aichang  740】    

有两种模式:
Brand sharing和 asset sharing
对A考的比较多,要求说两个联合方可以有完全不同的产品,但可以share real estate and technology,主要是为了降低成本
第二段讲这两个联合模式的可能风险。前者要求按比例,后者要求什么market target,然后举例,然后有题目。
主旨题,选那个有risk的。
和A相似的模式,【机经里说的是B模式】选那个某个店把自己的某东西租给另外一个店。

V4  【by: dyz 700+】11.5日    

企业联合模式的,V1说的蛮清楚。我只能补充一点点了,两种企业alliance联合模式具体好像是叫:band-share&asset-share。第一段就提出这两种模式,第二段说了各自的risk。题目简单容易做。文章也很短的。

V5  【by: 阿树  740】11.7日    

第一段介绍的是联盟的分类分为两种BRAND-ALLIANCE品牌联盟,然后举例说比如X牌和X牌一起宣传这种就是互相利用对方名气的品牌联盟
还有一种是asset-alliance财产联盟,比如在机场开个星巴克就可以相互利用基础设施多好啊简直是何乐而不为。在这一段的最后列举了这两种联盟的好处,比如好的声誉可以对联盟的对方也有所提升啊BLAHBLAH
在这一段话锋一转,用这种联盟你们一定要小心哦。因为双方的得利很可能是不成比例的,尤其是财产联盟,还是用了机场开咖啡馆的例子。比如说你不可能因为咖啡难喝就换另一个公司的飞机吧,但是飞机晚点以后你看那间咖啡店都怎么看怎么不爽了(大概这个意思)总之就是提醒企业家在制定这种联盟之前一定和对手仔细的negotiate,把整个联盟的PLAN制定好这样才不会出现得利比例大幅失调的这种情况。
问了一个下面哪一种属于财产联盟的情况
我选了在加油站卖一种和汽车相关的什么东西,这题还是蛮好排除的

V6  【by: dumdumface  700+】11.10日    晚

题目狗狗都有了 补充一点大牛的答案
和asset相似的模式,选那我选的是DVD出租店开在chain connivance里面
147#
发表于 2012-2-10 21:44:19 | 只看该作者
1.1.6  经济贸易的合作★△
V1第一篇好像是现在经济贸易的合作加强,然后举了欧盟和北美自由贸易区的例子,但是又说这两个是不一样的,如何如何的。

V2关于国际贸易新动向. 先指出现在以地区合作联盟为主的国际贸易合作组织是现在国际贸易合作的新现象;第二段举了一个北美欧洲成立的旨在扩大合作加强商品流通的国际合作组织;另一个是以为了反对美国的贸易保护主义而成立的国际贸易合作组织;(后面有题问二者的区别,区别就是成立目的不同一个是没有贸易保护主义条件下成立的一个是为了加强自己保护反对美国贸易保护主义) 最后指出虽然成立的目的不同但是他们都预示了国际贸易合作的新的未来和新的问题.

V3 (760)1. 自由贸易,寂静1.1.6。考古非常成功,exactly原文。大家考前一定仔细看一遍原文。考古中的问题有几个都是完全一样的:
1) The primary purpose of the passage as a whole is to;
5) Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the European Community prior to the adoption of the Europe 1992 program?
7) Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
所以,如果考到这篇,一定要保证快速拿下了

考古
比较北美自由贸易圈和欧盟两个区域经济济团的异同
版本1)讲区域一体化,研究了美国和加拿大的那个北美自由贸易圈和欧盟两个区域经济济团的异同。
有一个问题是说可以infer欧盟1992年以前是怎样的,文中说1992年以后会消除成员国之间impediment of free flow of goods, labor等等,所以可以推出92年以前是有障碍的。
版本2)还有一道是关于政府和跨国公司的,提到了两个组织,大概是北美和欧洲的两个经济合作组织。说现在合作组织贸易国间都互相减少贸易壁垒之类之类。

原文

As the economic role of multinational, global corporations expands, the international economic environment will be shaped increasingly not by governments or international institutions, but by the interaction between governments and global corporations, especially in the United States, Europe, and Japan. A significant factor in this shifting world economy is the trend toward regional trading blocs of nations, which has a potentially large effect on the evolution of the world trading system. Two examples of this trend are the United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and Europe 1992, the move by the European Community (EC) to dismantle impediments to the free flow of goods, services, capital, and labor among member states by the end of 1992. However, although numerous political and economic factors were operative in launching the move to integrate the EC’s markets, concern about protectionism within the EC does not appear to have been a major consideration. This is in sharp contrast to the FTA; the overwhelming reason for that bilateral initiative was fear of increasing United States protectionism. Nonetheless, although markedly different in origin and nature, both regional developments are highly significant in that they will foster integration in the two largest and richest markets of the world, as well as provoke questions about the future direction of the world trading system.
1.     The primary purpose of the passage as a whole is to
(A) describe an initiative and propose its continuance
(B) chronicle a development and illustrate its inconsistencies
(C) identify a trend and suggest its importance
(D) summarize a process and question its significance(C)
(E) report a phenomenon and outline its probable future
2. According to the passage, all of the following are elements of the shifting world economy EXCEPT
(A) an alteration in the role played by governments
(B) an increase in interaction between national governments and international regulatory institutions
(C) an increase in the formation of multinational trading alliances
(D) an increase in integration in the two richest markets of the world(B)
(E) a fear of increasing United States protectionism
3.     The passage suggests which of the following about global corporations?
(A) Their continued growth depends on the existence of a fully integrated international market.
(B) Their potential effect on the world market is a matter of ongoing concern to international institutions.
(C) They will have to assume quasi-governmental functions if current economic trends continue.
(D) They have provided a model of economic success for regional trading blocs.(E)
(E) Their influence on world economics will continue to increase.
4.     According to the passage, one similarity between the FTA and Europe 1992 is that they both
(A) overcame concerns about the role of politics in the shifting world economy
(B) originated out of concern over unfair trade practices by other nations
(C) exemplify a trend toward regionalization of commercial markets
(D) place the economic needs of the trading bloc ahead of those of the member nations(C)
(E) help to ensure the continued economic viability of the world community
5.     Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the European Community prior to the adoption of the Europe 1992 program?
(A) There were restrictions on commerce between the member nations.
(B) The economic policies of the member nations focused on global trading issues.

(C) There were few impediments to trade between the member nations and the United States.
(D) The flow of goods between the member nations and Canada was insignificant.(A)
(E) Relations between multinational corporations and the governments of the member nations were strained.
6.    The author discusses the FTA and Europe 1992 most likely in order to
(A) point out the similarities between two seemingly disparate trading alliances
(B) illustrate how different economic motivations produce different types of trading blocs
(C) provide contrasting examples of a trend that is influencing the world economy
(D) identify the most important characteristics of successful economic integration(C)
(E) trace the history of regional trading blocs
7.     Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
(A) An argument is put forth and evidence for and against it given.
(B) An assertion is made and opposing evidence presented.
(C) Two hypotheses are described and shown to inconsistent with one another.
(D) A phenomenon is identified and illustrations of this phenomenon offered.(D)
(E) A specific case of a phenomenon is discussed a generalization drawn.--------by nowwsy
148#
发表于 2012-2-10 21:45:10 | 只看该作者
2月23号考试,非常感谢
149#
发表于 2012-2-10 21:50:58 | 只看该作者
哦哦~我说呢~我每天都来看楼主的更新~老给力了!
150#
发表于 2012-2-10 21:54:30 | 只看该作者
1.2.4.    女性从政参选
V1综合版 感谢Sabrina01 & 0906shi 730
短文章
现象 越来越多的女性被雇佣来为社会做贡献,按理说应该更有机会参与政治,在社会上更有发言权。然而事实并非如此,女性参加政治选举成功的几率依然很低。(有考题)
原因1 党派不重视女性/选举的__也是阻碍 (被否定)
原因2 党派高层看似重视和鼓励女性选举,但是选的都是 (1)不重要的,中标几率低(2)with强力竞争对手(3)和想连任的(连任几率比一般人大)人一起竞争 的岗位
结论 女性依然无法翻身
1 主旨:解释一个本该发生却没发生的事情
2 问一下哪个属于女性竞争中的情况:9个人去竞争3个职位
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 22:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部