ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 19839|回复: 37
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD4-v7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-27 13:58:00 | 只看该作者

GWD4-v7


Many scholars have theorized that


               economic development, particularly


               industrialization and urbanization, con-


Line      tributes to the growth of participatory


  (5)      democracy;  according to this theory, it


would seem logical that women would


both demand and gain suffrage in ever


greater numbers whenever economic


development expanded their economic


(10)     opportunities.  However, the economic


development theory is inadequate to


explain certain historical facts about the


implementation of women’s suffrage.


For example, why was women’s suf-


(15)     frage, instituted nationally in the United


States in 1920, not instituted nationally


in Switzerland until the 1970’s?  Indus-


trialization was well advanced in both


countries by 1920:  over 33 percent


(20)     of American workers were employed


               in various industries, as compared


               to 44 percent of Swiss workers.


Granted, Switzerland and the United


States diverged in the degree to


(25)     which the expansion of industry coin-


cided with the degree of urbanization:


only 29 percent of the Swiss population


lived in cities of 10,000 or more inhabi-


tants by 1920.  However, urbanization


(30)     cannot fully explain women’s suffrage.


Within the United States prior to 1920,


for example, only less urbanized


               states had granted women suffrage.


Similarly, less urbanized countries


(35)          such as Cambodia and Ghana had


voting rights for women long before


Switzerland did.  It is true that Switzer-


land’s urbanized cantons (political


subdivisions) generally enacted


(40)          women’s suffrage legislation earlier


than did rural cantons.  However,


these cantons often shared other


characteristics—similar linguistic back-


grounds and strong leftist parties—that


may help to explain this phenomenon.


The passage suggests which of the following about urbanization in Switzerland and the United States by 1920?




  • A greater percentage of Swiss industrial workers than American industrial workers lived in urban areas.

  • There were more cities of 10,000 or more inhabitants in Switzerland than there were in the United States.

  • Swiss workers living in urban areas were more likely to be employed in industry than were American workers living in urban areas.

  • Urbanized areas of Switzerland were more likely than similar areas in the United States to have strong leftist parties.

  • why the answer is D

    沙发
    发表于 2004-8-2 07:56:00 | 只看该作者
    好像不是gwd4,我找不到原题,请把答案贴全
    板凳
    发表于 2004-8-20 15:26:00 | 只看该作者

    Granted, Switzerland and the United

    States diverged in the degree to

    (25)      which the expansion of industry coin-

    cided with the degree of urbanization:

    only 29 percent of the Swiss population

    lived in cities of 10,000 or more inhabi-

    tants by 1920.

    定位L27-29

    地板
    发表于 2004-9-10 10:44:00 | 只看该作者

    这篇不是GWD7的

    5#
    发表于 2004-9-27 02:24:00 | 只看该作者

    The passage suggests which of the following about urbanization in Switzerland and the United States by 1920?

    1. A greater percentage of Swiss industrial workers than American industrial workers lived in urban areas.

    2. There were more cities of 10,000 or more inhabitants in Switzerland than there were in the United States.

    3. Swiss workers living in urban areas were more likely to be employed in industry than were American workers living in urban areas.

    4. Urbanized areas of Switzerland were more likely than similar areas in the United States to have strong leftist parties.
    5. A greater percentage of the United States population than the Swiss population lived in urban areas.

    Isn't the answer is E??

    6#
    发表于 2004-12-12 23:13:00 | 只看该作者
    sure , E, refer to line 21
    7#
    发表于 2004-12-12 23:15:00 | 只看该作者
    line 21-line 29
    8#
    发表于 2004-12-12 23:49:00 | 只看该作者
    what is GWD????
    9#
    发表于 2005-4-22 15:36:00 | 只看该作者
    只是因为only的缘故?
    10#
    发表于 2005-4-26 10:01:00 | 只看该作者

    单就E选项而言,only是一部分的原因,准确地说,应该是定位这一整句话:Granted, Switzerland and the United States diverged in the degree to (25)     which the expansion of industry coin-cided with the degree of urbanization: only 29 percent of the Swiss population lived in cities of 10,000 or more inhabi-tants by 1920.  

    Switzerland and the US diverged in the degree of urbanization再加上前面一句话,说明作者是进行这2者的对比,only 29%说明Swiss少,而US更多。

    简而言之,我觉得only 是一部分的原因。

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-18 07:28
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部