ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖

[逻辑小分队] 【每日逻辑练习第二季】【1-2】

  [复制链接]
发表于 2018-3-17 10:48:50 | 显示全部楼层
3.17
错3道:条件限定词+题目意思
1. Beverage company representative: The plastic rings
that hold six-packs of beverage cans together
pose a threat to wild animals, which often
become entangled in the discarded rings and
suffocate as a result. Following our lead, all
beverage companies will soon use only those
rings consisting of a new plastic that
disintegrates after only three days’ exposure to
sunlight. Once we all complete the switchover
from the old to the new plastic rings, therefore,
the threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose
to wild animals will be eliminated.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously
weakens the representative’s argument?  
--BIBLE WEAKEN NO.2

Entangled:被卷入的
Discarded:被丢弃的
Disintegrate:使分解
suffocation :窒息
Ring:塑料环
37
P:塑料rings会对野生物造成威胁。在我们的领导下,所有公司将只用那些由新塑料组成的rings,这种塑料在阳光下三天之内就能降解了。
C:一旦我们完成了所有从旧到新的转换,塑料rings使野生物窒息的威胁将会消除。
削弱
conclusion说的是threat from plastic rings会减少,而不是threat from NEW plastic rings会减少,所以这里的threat=old+new!!!
思路1 :旧的还有---继续有窒息威胁
2:新的----还能带来 窒息 威胁
A)The switchover to the new plastic rings will
take at least two more years to complete.转变至少要两年,无关
(B) After the beverage companies have switched
over to the new plastic rings, a substantial
number of the old plastic rings will persist
in most aquatic and woodland environments.转换之后,仍有大量旧的rings会在水栖和木地环境中使用。和条件说完全转换冲突,排
-------------正确答案,做错
可能还要好好揣摩persist在这里的意思:存留。意思应该是虽然全部替换了,但旧的拉环还会残留。
说明大量的old plastic rings 残留,所以很容易还会继续suffocate animals.

(C) The new plastic rings are slightly less
expensive than the old rings.价格,无关
(D) The new plastic rings rarely disintegrate
during shipping of beverage six-packs
because most trucks that transport canned
beverages protect their cargo from sunlight.在船运过程中无法降解,因为没法晒太阳。我觉得不冲突,排
-----答案说,这个没有address the threat of suffocation to animals?
(E) The new plastic rings disintegrate into
substances that are harmful to aquatic
animals when ingested in substantial
quantities by them.降解的物质对水栖生物有害,对
--------------------普遍错误答案!!要扣清结论的细节
错误思路:generalize了结论,一边读结论一边总结出来的是:使用新塑料环将会对野生物有好处。→所以只要答案表明新塑料有坏的影响就可以了。错!!
再读一遍结论:结论说的是,能消除使野生物窒息的威胁。窒息!!这个选项并没有说是怎样的harm,即有可能不是suffocated造成的,那么就和结论不符了。

2.
Tiger sharks are common in the waters surrounding Tenare Island.  Usually tiger sharks feed on smaller sharks, but sometimes they have attacked tourists swimming and surfing at Tenare's beaches.  This has hurt Tenare's tourism industry, which is second only to its fishing industry in annual revenues.  In order to help the economy, therefore, the mayor of the island has proposed an ongoing program to kill any tiger sharks within a mile of the beaches.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly calls into question the likelihood that implementation of the mayor's proposal will have the desired consequence?
-- PREP07 CR1 NO.5
55’
B:T鲨鱼有时会攻击游泳和冲浪的游客,这损害了当地的旅游业。
W:杀掉任何一只距离沙滩一公里的T鲨鱼
C:从而帮助经济
加强 错!!!题目没读懂:是削弱
Call into:对。。。表示质疑
思路1:杀掉以后就不会有游客受袭击
2:游客相信这个措施有用,会重新回来旅游
3:杀了T会导致小鲨鱼数量增多,从而带来不好影响,从而影响经济
(A) Even if not all the tiger sharks that come close to the beaches are killed, the existence of the program would reassure 使。。。安心tourists.对的,和我预测的思路2一样
(B) Business owners who depend on tourism are willing to pay most of the cost of implementing the program.谁花钱支持这个项目,无关
(C) Tourists come to Tenare Island for its beaches, even though the island features a number of other tourist attractions.无关
(D) The small sharks on which tiger sharks prey feed on fish that are commercially important to the island's fisheries.谈论小鲨鱼和鱼,无关
--------正确答案:当时没好好注意答案,就想着结论强调的是大鲨鱼和游客,和这两个新对象无关。第一,思路没想到这个;第二,对commercial这个词不够警惕
Tiger shark↓→small shark↑→fish↓→hurt the economy
(E) Not all tourists who come to Tenare Island enjoy swimming or surfing.不是所有游客来这里会去游泳冲浪,错

2.不难
The country of Ertland has never imported apples in any significant quantity because consumers there generally prefer the unique texture of Ertland-grown apples. Nevertheless, apple growers from Kosolia, a neighboring country, plan to sell their apples in Ertland by selling Kosolia-grown apples at half the price of local apples and promoting them as a nourishing, low-cost alternative.
Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the viability of the plan by Kosolia's apple growers to sell their apples in Ertland?
-- PREP07 CR1 NO.6
B:E国的人从来不进口大量别国的苹果(还是会进口,但数量不多),因为他们喜欢自己国家的苹果口感
C:K国打算在E国销售自己国家的苹果(半价销售,并且打着富含营养 价格低的替代来推销)
削弱
思路1:E国人不买账,就算价格低,他们也不care
思路2:就算有很多人买,但最终K国商人还是亏本,做不下了
--------抓住前提:价格---所以E国也有可能降价销售,先讲竞争对手打出国,再升价
(A) Most of the varieties of apples grown in Ertland were originally derived from common Kosolian varieties.两类品种类似,说明容易被替代,加强
(B) Consumers in Ertland tend to spend about the same proportion of their income on fresh fruits and vegetables as do consumers in Kosolia.两国人的消费结构,无关
(C) At times in the past, Ertland has exported significant quantities of apples to Kosolia.过去E向K出口了大量苹果。没紧扣前提里的价格,排
(D) Some varieties of apples grown in Kosolia can be harvested throughout most of the year, whereas the varieties grown in Ertland can be harvested only during two months of the year.说明K国在数量上占优势,加强
(E) Profiles of Ertland-grown apples are high enough in Ertland that growers, wholesalers, and retailers there could easily afford to reduce the price at which these apples are sold.E国苹果收益足够高,所以E国商人完全应对得了价格战。
-----对,这样K国价格战就不占优势。扣前提

3.不难
As part of major renovations to Flowertown's Main Street train station, consultants to the train company proposed moving the station's entrance from its current valuable Main Street location to a low-rent adjoining side street and then leasing the high-rent entrance space to retail businesses. In that way, the train company could easily pay for those and all other proposed renovations without negative impact on its tight budget.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the consultants' proposal?
-- PREP07 CR1 NO.7
1’16’’
P: 咨询顾问提议把火车站的入口从现在价值高的主干道移到低租金的街上,然后把高租金的入口租给零售商
C:这样,火车公司就有钱做其他方面的重建在不影响它紧缺的预算下
增强
思路1:转移入口带来的负面影响小于它的正面影响,所以火车站总体还是赚
(A) More train commuters are employed in businesses located on Main Street than in businesses located on the adjoining side street.大部分乘火车的人是在主干街道那里工作,削弱
(B) A reliable survey of Flowertown's commuters showed that virtually none of them would use the train any less frequently if the station's entrance were moved.---------没有人会因为移了位置而影响乘火车频率,对
(C) The high-rent block of Flowertown's Main Street includes several buildings whose owners currently seek to replace long-standing tenants lost in recent months.无关
(D) If the station's entrance were moved, the train company would need to begin costly renovations to its Main Street entrance space.削弱
(E) Ridership on Flowertown trains declined only slightly from 1970 to 1985 while other train companies lost large numbers of commuters.和时间有什么关系,排

5.
Automobile Dealer's Advertisement:
The Highway Traffic Safety Institute reports that the PZ 1000 has the fewest injuries per accident of any car in its class. This shows that the PZ 1000 is one of the safest cars available today.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?
-- PREP07 CR1 NO.8
14’
P:报告表明在同一汽车层次里,PZ出事故的次数最少
C:所以PZ时当今最安全的汽车
削弱
思路1:概率小≠次数少:PZ开的人少所以出事次数少
2:报告不真实
3:要抓住条件的每一个关键词!!这一类型的车本身就不安全,所以差的里面挑好的,结果还是差
(A) The Highway Traffic Safety Institute report listed many cars in other classes that had more injuries per accident than did the PZ 1000.加强
(B) In recent years many more PZ 1000s have been sold than have any other kind of car in its class.加强
(C) Cars in the class to which the PZ 1000 belongs are more likely to be involved in accidents than are other types of cars.加强------正确答案:没读懂这句话意思,与其他类型的汽车相比,PZ 1000所属的类中的汽车更容易发生事故。
我当时想的是既然这种类型的车更容易发生事故,而Z次数还最低,不就说明它安全吗。
但我们要得出这个结论是要和所有汽车比。矮子里拔将军,怎么也不可能是最安全的
(D) The difference between the number of injuries per accident for the PZ 1000 and that for other cars in its class is quite pronounced.加强
(E) The Highway Traffic Safety Institute issues reports only once a year.-----侧面说报告不能作数,我感觉这题答案都没有最佳------错,我当时也觉得E说不通,但其他都被自己排掉了- -
发表于 2018-7-7 09:46:29 | 显示全部楼层
P;换成新材质的plastic rings
C:↓动物的threat
BI 动物常会被rings困住,导致wild animals伤亡。新材质的rings在几天内可以分解
预测:1.困住animal常常在rings被丢弃的前几天
2.新材质可能会吸引动物去吃/其他举动,造成的伤亡更大
A 两年时间?but the new rings would sooner or later do good to the animals. it failed to provide debate.
B it doesn't  matter whether the rings would remain in the wild. now we are simply talking about the effect of the plastic rings of new material. Even if the implementation does not exist, these rings would still remain in the wild.
C it might contribute to the conclusion of the argument. since less money of the rings means more accessible for the manufactures and the customers. The result is that less animals would suffer just as the statement presumes.
Dthe rings remains indegradable during shipment has nothing to do with the later degradation in the wild. If the manufacture failed to let the ring stay normally in the shipping no one would really like to buy it since it failed to protect the commodity-that's the essential liability of it.
E correct. the statement suggests that the wild animals would suffer owning to the substance released by the new material. the decreas of the amount of animals killed by the rings are compansated by the amount killed by the substance of the material.


P:杀了海滩1mile以内的虎鲨鱼
C 振兴旅游业
BI 鲨鱼会吃swim和surf的人,通常吃小鲨鱼
预测:1.人们就是来看虎鲨的,杀光了经济更不行
2.吃的人很少都是不守规矩的。杀光了虎鲨小鲨鱼才会吃更多人或者造成其他损失
A 应该是strengthen。这个项目会促进游客前往,也就意味着boost the economy
B C北京信息
D correct。损人不利己
E并不是所有人在游泳和surf但是只要有,鲨鱼就会吃人。所以杀光就是好事——并没有反驳原文

P 邻国低价买苹果
C作为本地的替代
BI E这个地方的人只吃E自产的苹果,从不进口
预测:1.E国人有..(有某种特殊的病),只有E地土长出来的苹果才能让他们(免于痛苦)
2.K 苹果太便宜反而没人买,因为E以贵著称,这里的人就是喜欢买贵的
反正E的人不管什么情况都和正常人不一样;)
A strengthen,起源一样,没什么不同。更便宜就买那个
B 和题目无关。。¥一样我不想买还是不买
C 如果种子留下了,重在了K,K的苹果就有人买了
D strengthen
E correct
没考虑到E苹果不进口的终极原因——只考虑了消费者没考虑国内的流通渠道的销售商等。销售商一有风吹草动就联起手来动手,外来苹果不可能卖出去啊。所以不能只考虑消费者的原因

P 将入口移位,并针对铺面收取大笔租金
C 收入可观,可以抵消fee
BI 重建
预测:1.换了地方不交租金,生意不好的情况不存在(只要有这个station就会有人买单)
只考虑了租不租没考虑买不买。只有用户多了,商家才会觉得有机可乘才会过来。
A 削弱,如果搬走了,更少的commuter
B correct 就算换了entrance 他们还会用哦
C 无关。。换了才好呢。。但和本公司有什么关系??
D 花费又高了还是本来就应该花?重复了原文背景。错误
E 差点儿落入了你的圈套!!!就算rate不变,也许就是因为entrance比其他公司要好。这下好了你换了门。没人来了

P 在accident里的伤亡最少
C 最安全的车车哦
推测:伤亡少车就安全?也许在其他方面根本不行。即伤亡少推理不出最安全
A strengthen
B 无关
C correct
D strengthen
E 一年一次。。。难道频率不一样吗在不同季节??很有可能被当做正确选项——因为会在内心脑补——
哦,其他车型春季冬季accident多,其他季节少。而这个car夏季多。分季节来看这个车就不行了!!
!!!!!想多了孩子。。这种想法还需要assumption啊但是它太隐晦

哭泣.. .. 以为自己分析的最好的第一题错了.. .. 让我来好好反省:
原文的说法“threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated” 我的推论“killed会变少”。我的关注点在新材料的rings会减少kill吗?题目的关注对象是“是否减少了plastic rings的负面影响” 注意后者涵盖的范围更广:(新+旧)plastic rings的影响。因为并没有说明到底是新/旧的Effect   answer choice (E) is a shell game that attacks a conclusion that is similar but different than the actual conclusion.

B 从前的隐患没有解决,伤亡还是未知数。 就像地雷没有被挖出来,我们造出了新地雷——可以从地面上辨认出来有地雷 E:the conclusion is specifically about suffocation, and answer choice (E) does not address suffocation.

发表于 2018-8-19 17:51:38 | 显示全部楼层
精炼:B
1.计时44s
2. Premise:
we all complete the switchover from the old to the new plastic rings
Conclusion:
the threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated
3.猜测:It's possible that the wild animals suffocate before the rings can disintegrates
4.选项分析
A.Although they need time to complete the switchover, the aim can be achieved once the switchover is over.
B.Correct, with this condition, even new plastic is used, the threat to animals still exist.
C.The prices of rings are irrelevant to the aim
D.What we discuss is the rings in wildland
E.Aquatic animals? irrelevant, what we discuss is the suffocate--the details in the conclusion is important. Besides, never choose the last choice just because the former choices seems not right in the exam! Maybe you are too nervous to think carefully about the choices in the exam~

逻辑链:
1、D
39s
Premise:
Tiger sharks feed on small sharks; sometimes they attack tourists, having bad influence on the tourism industry; tourism is second, fishing is the first.
Conclusion:
Kill tiger sharks to help the economy
猜测:more small sharks eat more fish
2、E
36s
Premise:
customers in E prefer local apples; apples from K is nourishing and cheap
Conclusion:
Growers in K can sell their apples
猜测:customers in E don't like apples in K even though they are cheap
3、B
35s
Premise:
change the train station' entrance from its current valuable Main Street location to a low-rent adjoining side street and lease the high-rent entrance space to retail space
Conclusion:
The train company could easily pay for those and all other proposed renovations without negative impact on its tight budget
猜测:...support, so I have no idea
4、C
18s
Premise:
PZ 1000 has the fewest injuries per accident of any car in its class
Conclusion:
PZ 1000 is one of the safest cars available today
猜测:Maybe PZ 1000 involve more accidents than other cars
发表于 2018-9-8 15:43:07 | 显示全部楼层
1. 削弱
B: The plastic rings that hold six-packs of beverage cans together pose a threat to wild animals, which often
become entangled in the discarded rings and suffocate as a result.
P:  Following our lead, allbeverage companies will soon use only thoserings consisting of a new plastic that
disintegrates after only three days’ exposure to sunlight.
C: Once we all complete the switch over from the old to the new plastic rings, therefore,he threat of suffocation that plastic rings pose to wild animals will be eliminated.
猜:一般三天之内动物就遇害惹
E
正确答案:B

2. 虚弱
B:Tiger sharks are common in the waters surrounding Tenare Island.  Usually tiger sharks feed on smaller sharks, but sometimes they have attacked tourists swimming and surfing at Tenare's beaches.  This has hurt Tenare's tourism industry, which is second only to its fishing industry in annual revenues.
P:In order to help the economy
C:therefore, the mayor of the island has proposed an ongoing program to kill any tiger sharks within a mile of the beaches.
猜想:伤人的不是 within a mile 的
D

3. 削弱
P:The country of Ertland has never imported apples in any significant quantity because consumers there generally prefer the unique texture of Ertland-grown apples.
C:Nevertheless, apple growers from Kosolia, a neighboring country, plan to sell their apples in Ertland by selling Kosolia-grown apples at half the price of local apples and promoting them as a nourishing, low-cost alternative.
猜:市场饱和,不需要低价苹果
E

4. 加强
B:
P:As part of major renovations to Flowertown's Main Street train station, consultants to the train company proposed moving the station's entrance from its current valuable Main Street location to a low-rent adjoining side street and then leasing the high-rent entrance space to retail businesses.
C: In that way, the train company could easily pay for those and all other proposed renovations without negative impact on its tight budget.
猜想:转移入口不会影响收入
B

5. 削弱
P: PZ 1000 has the fewest injuries per accident of any car in its class
C: his shows that the PZ 1000 is one of the safest cars available today.
猜想:伤的人少,死的人多?伤的人少,但出事的频率大?
C

正确率:4/5

发表于 2018-11-1 21:06:36 | 显示全部楼层
Mark一下!               
发表于 2018-11-2 16:14:28 | 显示全部楼层
    一   
1) 计时:55s
2) 逻辑链Situation
Background information
wild animals eat something resulting from the ring
premise
the company led the industry to replace the old one with the new one
the new ring will disintegrate
conclusion
the wild animals will not be impacted by the ring(其实重点应该是野生动物被噎住的威胁被消除了)
3) 推测(Prephrase: mentally formulate your answer to the question stem):
the wild animal can be hurt by other things
not all the companies would like to follow the company(the company 高估 its influence)
4) 选项分析:选B
(查了单词之后觉得应该选E,削弱的最厉害;
我发现我没有读清楚原文的关系,漏掉了很多细节,因为不懂单词)
*选项解释不提供固定思路,请根据自己的理解对每一错误选项给出错误原因和类型的解释(无关选项思考清楚为什么无关),对正确选项分析其与题干逻辑链的关系。
A  difficulty in switching
   虽然觉得是会影响计划实施的进程,但是削弱的力量很弱,讲不清原因
B although the plan aimed at good result, the fact is that the old rings still have a threat to the wild animals
C the answer does not influence the result that the animals will benefit from the new ring
D the opposite answer strenthen the argument
E this is the answer!in spite of the swithing, the new rings are still harmful to the wild anmials.(虽然可能产生了其他危险,但是野生动物被噎住的可能性的确消失了)

不懂的单词,要背单词!:
entangle(缠入,使卷入)
suffocate (被闷死;呼吸困难)
disintegrate(碎裂;破裂;解体;瓦解)

      二      
1) 计时:38s
2) 逻辑链Situation
bckground information
sharks in the seaside along the beach
premise
shakes attack the tourists and hurt the local tourism
tourism is the secong important industry in the town
conclusion
the sharkes should be killed
3) 推测(Prephrase: mentally formulate your answer to the question stem):
be harmful for the biology circle,thus result in the decrease in fish
4) 选项分析:选D
*选项解释不提供固定思路,请根据自己的理解对每一错误选项给出错误原因和类型的解释(无关选项思考清楚为什么无关),对正确选项分析其与题干逻辑链的关系。
A the opposite answer strenthen the proposal
B same as A
C same as A
D influence the fishing industry finally
E same as A

单词:reassure(使安心)

     三     
1) 计时:43s
2) 逻辑链Situation
*完整模式:
Premise:
A's citizens prefer local apples,selom import apples from other countries
but B's apples are sold at a lower price
Conclusion:
B's apples will break into A's market
3) 推测(Prephrase: mentally formulate your answer to the question stem):
citizens in A cannot adapt to the taste of the apples in B in spite of the lower price
4) 选项分析:选E
*选项解释不提供固定思路,请根据自己的理解对每一错误选项给出错误原因和类型的解释(无关选项思考清楚为什么无关),对正确选项分析其与题干逻辑链的关系。
A so the citizens in A may find it easily to accept B's apples; this is an opposite answer to strenthen the answer.
B the money that they spend will not influence the type of apples that they will choose; so this may be an irrelevant choice
C irrelevant new information  
D the answer can be used to justify why the B's apples will succeed in A, because the A's apples are not proficient enough; so this is also the opposite answer to strenthen the argument
E even if the B's apples can be sold at lower prices, A's apples can also lower prices to compete

   四     
1) 计时:60s
2) 逻辑链Situation
*完整模式:
Background information
the station set the entry in a highly-rent place
Premise:
the entry can be moved from the original place to a place with much lower rent
Subsidiary conclusion
the station can rent the original place to retail stores
Conclusion:
more money will follow into the buget and the station can afford more innovations(should be renovations)
3) 推测(Prephrase: mentally formulate your answer to the question stem):
the temperature the retaill stores are highly likely to open at the place(near city center/高人流量)
4) 选项分析:选B(这道题的答案和我的思路很不一样,所以选项读起来比较吃力)
*选项解释不提供固定思路,请根据自己的理解对每一错误选项给出错误原因和类型的解释(无关选项思考清楚为什么无关),对正确选项分析其与题干逻辑链的关系。
A so the movement will bring inconvenience for the commuters; this cannot help support the proposal
B the commuters will still take the train even it the entry is moved; at the same time, the rent revenue will increase the income of the station
C 和题目毫无关系,不知如何合理解释
D 翻修耗费更多费用,这恰好反对了原文
E 这是新信息,却关于过去,是无用、无关的信息

单词: renovation(翻新工作)
tenant(租客)
long-standing(长期的)

   五   
1) 计时:24s
2) 逻辑链Situation
*完整模式:
Premise
A result in less injuries in accidences among the cars in its calss
conclusion
A is the safest car
3) 推测(Prephrase: mentally formulate your answer to the question stem):
the class where A is is dangerous  
4) 选项分析:选C
*选项解释不提供固定思路,请根据自己的理解对每一错误选项给出错误原因和类型的解释(无关选项思考清楚为什么无关),对正确选项分析其与题干逻辑链的关系。
A 反而支持了argument,完全没有削弱
B 这个车在同类车里可能是较为安全的,所以人们购买它更多,但是也得考虑到该类型的车是不是平均的事故率就高。这个答案无法说明如果不和同类型的车相比的话,A这个车是否仍然安全
C 虽然和同类型的车相比较为安全,但A所处的汽车类型出事故比其他类型的车更高,因此并不能说明A是安全的车
D 只说明了差别被报道,并未说明是什么方面的差异
E 只报道了一年,也不能说明A的安全系数在以前就很高,或者很低
发表于 2018-11-14 15:12:52 | 显示全部楼层
1. 2.59  0:45
B: new rings disappear in 3 days
P: Switch over all old to new rings
C: no wild animals will be harmed threaten by suffocation
H: the 3days appearance won’t cause suffocation. The old will not be available to animals.
Suffocation: 窒息
A: E B—what about the old rings?
E said nothing about the treated of suffocation, so irrelevant!
Lesson: Read closely and know precisely what the author said. Do not  generalize! Remember, one of the rules for weakening arguments is to focus on the conclusion, and knowing the details of the conclusion is part of that focus.

2. 2:00 0:32
P: kill tiger shark to cause tourist back
C: help the second industry income
H: this won’ have negative economic effect on other area, such as the first industry.
A: D

3. 2:12 1:18
P: though E people love E apple, sell the K apple in half price
C: it can earn profit
H: some reason E people will buy K apple low price will attract E people to buy
A: E

4. 2:25 1:02
P: move 车站入口 from expansive area to cheap
C: save money & no negative impact
H: the movement won’t affect passagers— won’t affect the income.
A: B

5. 1:38 0:32
P: PZ 每车事故最少受伤
C:PZ最安全
H:受伤最少=最安全,没有其他安全隐患
A: C
发表于 2018-12-4 20:22:14 | 显示全部楼层
1.---41s
premise:because the new rings are eviornmentally friendly, so once all the plastic rings have changed.
conclusion:the eviormental problems caused by old rings will be eliminated.
bg info:the manufacturer claim that the old rings will cause serious eviornment problem.
prephrase:weaken--->there will be other obstacles even if they changed the rings.

Airrelevent. the time it takes to switch is not related to the topic
Bkept for the first right
Csupport
Dirrelevent. the selection is some kind related to the solution of the old rings
Ekept for the first round. rather less relevent than B

2.--->20s
premise:in order to develop economy
conclusion: the mayor decided to kill the sharks with one mile of the beach
bg info:the tiger shark usually prey on small sharks but sometimes they will also kill humans, which badly influenced the tourism of that place.
prephrase:weaken--->the solution is not helpful for developing economy.

Asupport
Bsupport and irrelevent
Cit distort the bg info
Dirrelevent to the small sharks
Eright
发表于 2018-12-4 20:27:43 | 显示全部楼层
E选项我也纠结了很久,勉勉强强猜对了,bible上讲的确实有道理,要细抠conclusion!
This is the most commonly chosen answer, and it is a
perfect example of a Shell Game. In this case, the answer preys upon test takers
who fail to heed Primary Objective #4: “Read closely and know precisely what
the author said. Do not generalize!” Many test takers read the conclusion and
think, “So when they start using these new rings, it will make things better for
the animals.” When these test takers get to answer choice (E), the answer looks
extremely attractive because it indicates that the implementation of the new
rings will also have a harmful effect. With this thinking in mind, many test
takers select answer choice (E) thinking it undermines the conclusion and they
are certain they have nailed the question. However, the conclusion is
specifically about suffocation, and answer choice (E) does not address
suffocation. Instead, answer choice (E) is a shell game that attacks a conclusion
that is similar but different than the actual conclusion. Remember, one of the
rules for weakening arguments is to focus on the conclusion, and knowing the
details of the conclusion is part of that focus.
发表于 2018-12-5 10:48:00 | 显示全部楼层
3.--->26s
premise:using half the price of the local apples
conclusion:K plans to sell apples in E as an low-price alternative
bg info:E never import apples because the citizens like the special texture of the local apples.
prephrase:weaken--->E citizen is care about the texture and taste of the apple but not the money it costs.

Asupport
Bthe budget of the two places citizens are not related to the topic
Cexport of E is not related
Dsupport
Eright

4.--->33s
这一块premise没有理解透彻——应该是铁道公司为了节约资金用以升级,可以将入口从高租金的地方挪到低租金的地方。我的错误显然是被business等带跑了。而且A的选项也理解错了,这里的意思是:通勤者在高租金的地方更多,也就是说是weaken的一个选项。
premise:leasing high rent entrance to the retailers
conclusion:so that the company can have enough money to renovation
bg info:the company needs money to renovation, and consultants give suggestions
prephrase:support--->retailer can earn money to support company's operation or take full advantage of the space or recruit less people.

Akept for the first round.right
Bsupport but show no relevence to the profit growth
Cirrelevent
Dweaken
Eirrelevent
正解是B

5.--->14s
这道题提供了一个思路:团体的平均水平可以代表一个个体!虽然说一直以来这样的选项都是错的,但是这里反过来考了!
premise:the car has the fewest car accident in the world
conclusion:it is the safest car in the world
prephrase:weaken--->1.what is the standard of safety---the accident number/the quality 2.the number of accidents is no use if the car is newly produced that there are very few case of driving as well.

Asupport
Bsupport
Cright.这个选项有点意外,需要看看解释。
Dirrelevent. not mentioning less or more
Eirrelevent
pronounced 明显的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-28 21:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部