ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5495|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD TN18-Q40 再求此题讨论,之前讨论很模糊,答案存在严重缺陷

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-25 18:43:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 ayear toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.



contribute….toward/to固定搭配)
A.year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year



B.year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year



C.year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education



D.year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously



E.year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

给的正确答案是D  ,
但D存在的问题和C一样: 逗号+adj或者逗号+Ved, 逻辑主语同是主句主语,因此要错就全错。
排除来去, 就只剩下A了,语法和逻辑上都没有任何问题。

想和大家讨论一下?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-8-26 04:40:45 | 只看该作者
LZ,我觉得A选项里“,previously paying……”在此应该是verb modifier表伴随,但在这句话里无论伴随哪个verb都不make sense,因为previously就显示了应该是以前的动作,发生在主句之前,怎么又会伴随主句呢~

另外我对“逗号+adj或者逗号+Ved, 逻辑主语同是主句主语”这个规则有些疑问,我感觉过去分词作为noun. modifier,除了在位于句首的时候逻辑主语要和主句主语相同,在句中的用法应该还是比较灵活的,verb modifier比较强调逻辑主语,noun. modifier本身就是修饰noun.,而非verb,怎么会对逻辑主语有要求呢?
In the United States, while the number of foreign-born residents and their children is higher than
ever, the percentage of the population they represent is not; in 1910 this group made up 35 percent
of the population, compared with 20 percent in 2000.(prep旧108)
这句里的compared如果逻辑主语是主句主语的话,就是this group,那后面这句话就是this group is compared with 20 percent in 2000,是不符合逻辑的,我认为此处compared就是在修饰就近的名词35 percent of the population.

C中compared,是不是存在夹心修饰的歧义呢?这个也不确定……但是C有previously副词修饰名词的绝对性错误~就足够排除掉它啦~

D里面instead of是preposition,不清楚LZ为什么说“但D存在的问题和C一样: 逗号+adj或者逗号+Ved, 逻辑主语同是主句主语,因此要错就全错。”

欢迎LZ拍砖~~共同研究进步的!!!
板凳
发表于 2011-10-31 00:17:39 | 只看该作者
LZ,我觉得A选项里“,previously paying……”在此应该是verb modifier表伴随,但在这句话里无论伴随哪个verb都不make sense,因为previously就显示了应该是以前的动作,发生在主句之前,怎么又会伴随主句呢~

另外我对“逗号+adj或者逗号+Ved, 逻辑主语同是主句主语”这个规则有些疑问,我感觉过去分词作为noun. modifier,除了在位于句首的时候逻辑主语要和主句主语相同,在句中的用法应该还是比较灵活的,verb modifier比较强调逻辑主语,noun. modifier本身就是修饰noun.,而非verb,怎么会对逻辑主语有要求呢?
In the United States, while the number of foreign-born residents and their children is higher than
ever, the percentage of the population they represent is not; in 1910 this group made up 35 percent
of the population, compared with 20 percent in 2000.(prep旧108)
这句里的compared如果逻辑主语是主句主语的话,就是this group,那后面这句话就是this group is compared with 20 percent in 2000,是不符合逻辑的,我认为此处compared就是在修饰就近的名词35 percent of the population.

C中compared,是不是存在夹心修饰的歧义呢?这个也不确定……但是C有previously副词修饰名词的绝对性错误~就足够排除掉它啦~

D里面instead of是preposition,不清楚LZ为什么说“但D存在的问题和C一样: 逗号+adj或者逗号+Ved, 逻辑主语同是主句主语,因此要错就全错。”

欢迎LZ拍砖~~共同研究进步的!!!
-- by 会员 huisang (2011/8/26 4:40:45)



类似instead of 的有including,都是介词!! 它们的跳跃能力比分词强。

真心觉得LS的语法好强
地板
发表于 2020-9-14 11:20:37 | 只看该作者
instead of 是介词短语,可以修饰名词也可以修饰动词;
楼上说的很对,跳跃能力比分词强;
楼主的“逗号+Ved 的逻辑主语同是主句主语“是错的,”svo,done”是就近修饰名词的;它和“svo,doing”不一样,“svo,doing”需要考虑逻辑主语的问题;
c选项的问题在于 previously $7,previously是副词,不能修饰名词
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 09:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部