[越毒] 吴月叁阅读小犬总结（共68只，更新:6/3 10：58）

WuApril

WuApril :
155楼ice age那篇是不是LZ在WORD中已经把大全里的类似篇幅和问题列出来了？

-- by 会员 morningzc (2011/5/10 21:05:40)

那个...我还没看大全那个文章...只是看了下本月寂静的内容

WuApril

1.3.8 和之前的那个有GWD原题的重复~可以合并

WuApril

1.3.5 的V1 V2版本看上去貌似不是一片文章。。。

WuApril

擦擦擦= =。。lz俺素一篇一篇看的......貌似占了你好多楼- -
不好意思哈哈哈哈~

Summer明明

问！！有*标识的表示有考古 啥意思？？？？？？

WuApril

1.4.4和之前的海怪的也可以合并~

WuApril

1.5.5 特别不确定这个。。。严重需要。。确认
1. Orchid 历史长短的研究（之前jj已有，具体意思没怎么读，大概讲讲我确定的）。
内容 ：第1段是大概说发现了关于Orchid 历史长短研究的新的证据，和dinosaur有关，揭示了orchid历史比之前想象的要长。这段最后一句是与主题题有关的一句话，大概是说这个这个发现对以前关于Orchid 历史长短的debatable有贡献。第二段描述了之前对Orchid历史的debate，“有人说Orchid relative young，while有人claim反驳了，说Orchid widespread presence & diverse species”。后面的段落不太记得了~抱歉~
题目：1. 细节题，题目是问第1段中提到amber&bee&pollen的那句话，作为an example reveal了什么。答案我不确定，就不说了，免得影响大家考场的判断。2.主题题，这个答案应该是包含了开头consider a evidence和debatable的那个选项，重点句在第1段最后一句，那句里直接出现了debatable。3.细节题，问题是 “用什么证据directly反驳了Orchid relative young”，答案应该是在第二段while引导的那句转折里找，是对widespread presence的改写，d答案好像是说“large scale”。 只记得这3题了~（JJ主人710）

WuApril

1.4.8和1.5.5可以合并

WuApril

1,3.5 第一个版本......不确定啊啊啊这个。。待确认
年代美国经济停滞的原因探讨。很长。

第一段说二战前美国经济发展很快，尤其是制造业。二战后就不行了，因为海外贸易和国际竞争使得美国的批量制造失去比较优势。
第二段说70年代美国经济也不行。有些人认为是技术和行业细分使的美国的制造业失去竞争优势。
第三段，作者认为这个不能解释70年代美国的经济增长慢。举了一些例子。

主题题一道；第一段作用题，我选提供展开讨论的历史背景（其他选项比较离谱）；还有一个infer题，定位第三段，说美国的哪些靠技术创新取胜的小企业有什么特征？我选他们更喜欢雇用合同工。注意该题定位在技术创新取胜的小企业后面一句话。

May be the same as “ T-3-Q33-Q36 80年代美国经济增长变缓原因何在”
(This passage is excerpted from material published in 1997)
    Whereas United States eco-
    nomic productivity grew at an annual
    rate of 3 percent from 1945 to 1965,
Line                it has grown at an annual rate of
(5)                only about 1 percent since the early
    1970’s. What might be preventing
    higher productivity growth? Clearly,
    the manufacturing sector of the
    economy cannot be blamed. Since
(10)                1980, productivity improvements
    in manufacturing have moved the
    United States from a position of
    acute decline in manufacturing
    to one of world prominence.
(15)                Manufacturing, however, consti-
    tutes a relatively small proportion
    of the economy. In 1992, goods-
    producing businesses employed
    only 19.1 percent of American
(20)                workers, whereas service-producing
    businesses employed 70 percent.
    Although the service sector has
    grown since the late 1970’s, its
    productivity growth has declined.
(25)                Several explanations have been
    Offered for this declined and for the
    discrepancy in productivity growth
    between the manufacturing and
    service sectors. One is that tra-
(30)                ditional measures fail to reflect
    service-sector productivity growth
    because it has been concentrated
    in improved quality of services.
    Yet traditional measures of manu-
(35)                facturing productivity have shown
    significant increases despite the
    undermeasurement of quality,
    whereas service productivity has
    continued to stagnate. Others argue
(40)                that since the 1970’s, manufacturing
    workers, faced with strong foreign
    competition, have learned to work
    more efficiently in order to keep their
    jobs in the United States, but service
(45)                workers, who are typically under
    less global competitive pressure,
    have not. However, the pressure on
    manufacturing workers in the United
    States to work more efficiently has
(50)                generally been overstated, often
    for political reasons. In fact, while
    some manufacturing jobs have been
    lost due to foreign competition, many
    more have been lost simply because
(55)                of slow growth in demand for manu-
    factured goods.
        Yet another explanation blames
    the federal budget deficit: if it were
    lower, interest rate would be lower
(55)                too, thereby increasing investment
    in the development of new technol-
    ogies, which would spur productivity
    growth in the service sector. There
    is, however, no dearth of techno-
(60)                logical resources, rather, managers
    in the service sector fail to take
    advantage of widely available skills
    and machines. High productivity
    growth levels attained by leading-
(65)                edge service companies indicate
    that service sector managers
    who wisely implement available
    technology and choose skillful
    workers can significantly improve
(70)                their companies’ productivity.
    The culprits for service-sector
    productivity stagnation are the
    forces－such as corporate
    takeovers and unnecessary
(75)                governmental regulation－that
    distract managers from the task
    of making optimal use of available
    resources.
文章结构清晰，为了回答为什么经济衰退，找到服务业的原因，为什么服务业衰退，找到服务业管理者的原因，最后找到根源：the forces---corporate takeovers and unnecessary governmental regulation.
T-3-Q33
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the budget deficit explanation for the discrepancy mentioned in line 27?
Research shows that the federal budget deficit has traditionally caused service companies to invest less money in research and development of new technologies.
New technologies have been shown to play a significant role in companies that have been able to increase their service productivity.
In both service sector and manufacturing, productivity improvements are concentrated in gains in quality.
The service sector typically requires larger investments in new technology in order to maintain productivity growth than dose manufacturing
High interest rates tend to slow the growth of manufacturing productivity as much as they slow the growth of service-sector productivity in the United States.

T-3-Q34
The passage states which of the following about the effect of foreign competition on the American manufacturing sector since the 1970’s?
It has often been exaggerated.
It has not been a direct cause of job loss.
It has in large part been responsible for the subsequent slowing of productivity growth.
It has slowed growth in the demand for manufactured goods in the United States.
It has been responsible for the majority of American jobs lost in manufacturing.
However, the pressure on manufacturing workers in the United States to work more efficiently has generally been overstated,

T-3-Q35
It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following was true of the United States manufacturing sector in the years immediately prior to 1980?
It was performing relatively poorly.
It was in a position of world prominence.
It was increasing its productivity at an annual rate of 3 percent.
It was increasing its productivity at an annual rate of 1 percent.
Its level of productivity was higher than afterward.
Since 1980, productivity improvements in manufacturing have moved the United States from a position of acute decline in manufacturing to one of world prominence.

T-3-Q36
The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about productivity improvements in United States service companies?
Such improvements would be largely attributable to efficiencies resulting from corporate takeovers.
Such improvements would depend more on wise implementation of technology than on managers’ choice of skilled workers.
Such improvements would be more easily accomplished if there were fewer governmental regulations of the service sector.
Such improvements would require companies to invest heavily in the development of new technologies.
Such improvements would be attributable primarily to companies’ facing global competitive pressure.
The culprits for service-sector productivity stagnation are the forces－such as corporate takeovers and unnecessary governmental regulation－that distract managers from the task of making optimal use of available resources.文章最后一句话。

WuApril

同上考古
美国经济
Para 1 美国经济技术发达，大规模生产产品导致成本下降，人民物质生活丰富，但二战后欧亚也按此模式发展。
Para 2 他国竞争力增强不是美国失去优势的唯一原因，跨国公司的策略不适合现今的经济形势，小、灵活、不终生雇佣员工、投资风险高的小企业（细节题）占有优势。740 (50,40)
第一段
美國的經濟在XXXX年的時候這麼好，主要是因為mass production帶來的國內經濟起飛，但是到了XXXX以後，因為國際化的關係，歐亞國家也會利用mass production，而且市場越來越流通，因此國際上的商業競爭越來越強。
第二段、第三段  (混在一起記不清了  只能敘述我記得的大意  抱歉)
但是，國際上商業競爭越來越強並不足以解釋XXXX以後，美國經濟沒有之前那麼好的原因。主要的原因應該是後來，光是mass production沒有辦法滿足市場的需求了，小公司開始興起，也興起了很多很多的新管理方式、用小量生產去滿足市場特殊需求等等...原本只靠mass production獲利的大型公司開始表現不那麼好....(後面記不清楚了，待後人補充吧) 710