[原创]钢G连之杀G复习计划，情况差不多的朋友可以一齐加油！

xxz5838

以下是引用ilhht在2009-3-23 9:58:00的发言：

对阿，改天我们在这里把排列组合整理一下吧，我一看到这种坑和罗卜问题就想往那个方向做，应该说是两种解法都可以的。

同意，我刚才做了DS1 51-70， 发现，知识点漏洞颇多，真的需要加强。

我真是堕落，好歹也是工科出身。

ilhht

当然不会，我是不敢post，我要是post，还不如请大家直接看那套考卷....楼上的拐杖，别甩下来，，砸到了猫头

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-23 10:33:28编辑过]

xxz5838

以下是引用ilhht在2009-3-23 10:33:00的发言：
当然不会，我是不敢post，我要是post，还不如请大家直接看那套考卷....楼上的拐杖，别甩下来，，砸到了猫头

谢谢lianzhang's support

我打自己还不行吗，哈哈。

等会吃完饭，在去找个好点的

ilhht

3月22日，狒狒逻辑test2第22题

22. In 1992, a major newspaper circulated throughout North American paid its reporters an average salary paid by its principle competitors to their reporters. An executive of the newspaper argued that this practice was justified, since any shortfall that might exist in the reporters’ salaries is fully compensated by the valuable training they receive through their assignments.

Which one of the following, if true about the newspaper in 1992, most seriously undermines the justification offered by the executive?

(A) Senior reporters at the newspaper earned as much as reporters of similar stature who worked for the newspaper’s principle competitors.

(B) Most of the newspaper’s reporters had worked there for more than ten years.

(C) The circulation of the newspaper had recently reached a plateau, after it had increased steadily throughout the 1980s.

(D) The union that represented reporters at the newspaper was different from the union that represented reporters at the newspaper’s competitors.

(E) The newspaper was widely read throughout continental Europe and Great Britain as well as North America.

一头雾水.....求助

一头雾水.....求助

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-23 12:12:36编辑过]

天蝎座1107

以下是引用ilhht在2009-3-23 12:12:00的发言：

3月22日，狒狒逻辑test2第22题

22. In 1992, a major newspaper circulated throughout North American paid its reporters an average salary paid by its principle competitors to their reporters. An executive of the newspaper argued that this practice was justified, since any shortfall that might exist in the reporters’ salaries is fully compensated by the valuable training they receive through their assignments. 原因结果:因为reporters的valuable training能够compensat any shotfall,所以this practice(工资和竞争公司一样) justified. 其实它隐含的假设就是valuable training存在

Which one of the following, if true about the newspaper in 1992, most seriously undermines the justification offered by the executive?

(A) Senior reporters at the newspaper earned as much as reporters of similar stature who worked for the newspaper’s principle competitors. 加强

(B) Most of the newspaper’s reporters had worked there for more than ten years. 这个不太好想 它是想说工作了很长时间就不算什么valuable training了 业务早熟悉了

(C) The circulation of the newspaper had recently reached a plateau, after it had increased steadily throughout the 1980s. 无关 circulation的好坏并不能影响结论

(D) The union that represented reporters at the newspaper was different from the union that represented reporters at the newspaper’s competitors. 无关

(E) The newspaper was widely read throughout continental Europe and Great Britain as well as North America.无关

一头雾水.....求助

一头雾水.....求助

一头雾水.....求助

恕我斗胆说一句，我觉的这个题出的不太好。因为我觉得B选项这个情况 如果不是做reporter这一行 怎么能清楚得知道多年就业务熟不需要valuable training了？我觉得这个没有体现GMAT出题的公平性

xxz5838

22. In 1992, a major newspaper circulated throughout North American paid its reporters an average salary paid by its principle competitors to their reporters. An executive of the newspaper argued that this practice was justified, since any shortfall that might exist in the reporters’ salaries is fully compensated by the valuable training they receive through their assignments.

Which one of the following, if true about the newspaper in 1992, most seriously undermines the justification offered by the executive?

(A) Senior reporters at the newspaper earned as much as reporters of similar stature who worked for the newspaper’s principle competitors.

(B) Most of the newspaper’s reporters had worked there for more than ten years.

(C) The circulation of the newspaper had recently reached a plateau, after it had increased steadily throughout the 1980s.

(D) The union that represented reporters at the newspaper was different from the union that represented reporters at the newspaper’s competitors.

(E) The newspaper was widely read throughout continental Europe and Great Britain as well as North America.

就是说，任何工资上的短缺都可以被他们工作中培训所补偿。所以，这里逻辑上的漏洞在哪里呢

如果说他们的REPORTERS都已经工作了10年以上，那么他们可获得的培训就几乎是零，也就从而WEAKEN这个ARGUMENT。

（A）只是简单提供了老员工的工资，并不能说明问题，因为题目说的是可能存在的SHORTFALL。老员工的工资可以和其他公司比，并不能说明没有其它的SHORTFALL的存在

(C) circulation 无关，原文也没提到

（D）union也是无关选项， 而且不同的UNION并不能说明工资上的多少

（E）也是无关，报纸的发行范围也和工资无关

这道题我第一次也做错了。所以，FF135 说的有道理

评论：此题较难，正确选项也比较含糊，需要推理，这种题在gmat中出现的不多。

PS 我也不喜欢这题的逻辑。

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-23 13:00:51编辑过]

天蝎座1107

所以很多前辈 例如小安 说LSAT逻辑和GMAT不太像 是有道理的啊 做了LSAT一定要回归GMAT GMAT逻辑还是做OG和GWD

xxz5838

以下是引用天蝎座1107在2009-3-23 13:01:00的发言：
所以很多前辈 例如小安 说LSAT逻辑和GMAT不太像 是有道理的啊 做了LSAT一定要回归GMAT GMAT逻辑还是做OG和GWD

LSAT的逻辑其实是最严谨的，学习了对我们以后的工作生活都有帮助，但对GMAT实在是帮助不大。

GMAT 本身的逻辑就不严谨，而且有些逻辑中间的GAP太大。

如果为了应付GAMT， LSAT不做也罢。

说句题外话（商人的逻辑怎么能和律师比，哈哈）

天蝎座1107

是啊是啊 xxz5838兄 你阅读怎么样啊 貌似你在国外上班 这样的话阅读不是小菜么 我今儿下午要把OG给逻辑简图了 向vivian MM学习

我2月的时候有看到考完的xdjms说逻辑题目变很长 有6行的

其实给够时间 逻辑大家都能搞明白 关键是实战要一下看清句子意思有些challenging啊

ilhht

虎虎，为啥你引用之后我又多了
“一头雾水”，原来是2头，

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-23 13:25:17编辑过]