以下是引用darkage在2007-9-3 22:47:00的发言：Given ******* and ********* （这里大概讲的是金融业市场的某种情况拉），paradigm on which many banks settled has come to involve, at its core, risk management. 其他选项有
On which many banks settled has come to involve, at their Of which many banks settled has come to involve, at its Many banks have settled has come to involve, at its
看来半天，也看不出来这个core该属于paradigm还是属于many banks的，就选了个A。这题耗了我４分钟，当时时间太多了。
这题我觉得core属于many banks吧.后面还有个风险管理. 以下是引用qincong83在2007-9-3 23:06:00的发言：分词短语（做状语），主句主语+谓语，插入语，宾语。 1)has 一定得是单数，因为不修饰paradigm的话，主句就没有谓语了。 2）插入语at its core一定是修饰主句的paradigm。因为如果修饰many banks，属于宾语从句同位语，逗号前没有连词，是意义断层。只有修饰主语名词短语的时候，才能用逗号隔开单独存在。所以its是判断点。 3）不看插入语结构是：Given..., paradigm has come to involve risk management. 全句通顺：）
请指教！
和darkage讨论了一下，对于这个its or their还是不太确定～ 特意查了一下相关题目： 13. In good years, the patchwork of green fields that surround the San Joaquin
Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of them in the area just for the season. (A) surround the San Joaquin
Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of them (B) surrounds the San Joaquin
Valley town bustles with farm workers, many of whom are 首先应该根据逻辑意思判断A of B哪个被定语从句修饰, 其次many of them是同位语, 比many of whom are简洁. 同位语的引导用that, 不能用which, 出现混淆的。 在句中无论直接插入新名词还是以插入语的形式, 都有可能造成以前的代词指代不清晰, 这题的they肯定不可以指代句子主语identities, OG的意思是此时就近指代, 所以中间出入新的名词是有歧义的.
16. Unlike/ like在句中作为插入语, 小心夹心修饰, Eg. Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore. (A) like adults (D) as adults do 插入语可以修饰前面的名词, 也可以修饰主语中心语(当在谓语前面的时候); 当like结构放在句尾的时候不再是插入语, 而是主语插入语的后置, 还是修饰主语, like结构修饰只要不产生歧义, 可以跳越, 选择最好的, 这里插入语没有造成夹心修饰, 因为后面不存在另一个比较对像.
如果是插入语就近修饰呢，我觉得their修饰banks也说的过去，而且插入语at ...core 是在谓语后面，就近修饰比较符合语感；如果凭语法点宏观看呢，its修饰paradigm 主语中心词似乎也没错。 估计我们得看全部题目才能做出来了，毕竟JJ回忆不全。 欢迎讨论啊
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-6 14:53:44编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
楼主
发表于 2007-9-6 14:29:00
