GWD-8-Q14: GWD-2-11

joejo9

GWD-8-Q14: GWD-2-11

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

A.       These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

B.        Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C.        Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D.       Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.

E.        Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

答案是D。可是题目中讨论的是对sulfity的过敏，D中Other substance是否无关呢？A又为什么不可以呢？

will_kk

选E吧,D的确是无关

joejo9

E蛮合理的，那么A呢？

phenomena

这道题感觉出的不好，如果wine里天然地存在sulfite，maker往里加sulfite岂不没事找事？相对来说我觉得A更为合理，如果没有替代品维持wine的preservative，降低过敏反应对商家有什么好处？

蓝露

这句话麻烦NN能把E选项翻一下么？

谢谢啊~

happyself

答案写的就是E我确定，我查过几份CD上的答案了。肯定选E的

sword_2007

fogwind

以下是引用joejo9在2007-5-26 10:05:00的发言：
E蛮合理的，那么A呢？

A.       These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

A和原文讨论的东西无关。原文讨论的是是否过敏的问题。A说的是如何实现防腐剂功能的问题。

smartsky11

up

fiona_hq

up