以下是引用yoyokaki在2007-2-23 21:49:00的发言：临睡前贴到我死活想不通的逻辑 Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted. This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.
Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?
- Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people. - This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown
University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before. - This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown
University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors. - The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown
University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before. - More than half of the money raised by Smithtown
University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
大家指教呀
大家指教呀 A正确， A强调他们确实联系了不捐款的人，所以，他们联系了，但是原文说了，大部分捐款仍然是来自于以前捐款的人，所以他们并不咋地嘛，联系了但人家没捐啊 C是不对的，C说大部分捐款都是来自于以前捐款的人，而且不用联系就捐来了，原文说了80%的联系的人，所以那就是说有80%的以前不捐款的人现在捐款了，那他们好强哦  | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-2-24 08:26:00
楼主
