ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: joywzy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-39,49 现在分词放在句尾的修饰

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2004-2-23 17:31:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢D兄,我想以下改进1的再改进:


改进1的再改进For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames, used to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears, were essential items of military equipment. 是否是正确的?


或者将原答案:For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears.    


改为:For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames, protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears, were essential items of military equipment.    是否更准确?

32#
发表于 2004-4-16 11:11:00 | 只看该作者
为什么不选E to protect 呢?
33#
发表于 2004-4-16 14:36:00 | 只看该作者

我感觉to do 放句未,在gmat中99%错,我还没印象有对的例子,而且to do本身单独用一般有表目的意味,这里没这个意思。to do在gmat中多用于词组。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-16 15:34:33编辑过]
34#
发表于 2004-4-16 15:29:00 | 只看该作者

听大虾们这么解释,完全清楚了!

35#
发表于 2004-5-17 04:43:00 | 只看该作者

请问一下:39-B/D的as为什么是incorrect?

36#
发表于 2004-5-19 02:48:00 | 只看该作者

stoneren :as是连词,不能这么用。


以下是引用JerryGuan在2004-2-23 17:31:00的发言:
谢谢D兄,我想以下改进1的再改进:
改进1的再改进For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames, used to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears, were essential items of military equipment. 是否是正确的?
或者将原答案:For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
改为:For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames, protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears, were essential items of military equipment. 是否更准确?


个人认为改进2正确,原因一见og191答案d的解释


Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.


(A)  provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry


(B)   provide free cashing of government checks, and creating basic savings accounts carrying


(C)  to provide free cashing of government checks, and creating basic savings accounts that carry


(D)  to provide free cashing of government checks, creating basic savings accounts to carry


(E)   to provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts that carry


Choice E, the best answer, is the only choice that maintains parallelism with the infinitive phrases to disclose..., [to] provide ..., and to create .... In A and B, the second element lacks the infinitive marker to. Choice C loses parallelism by shifting to a participial phrase, creating .... Choice D loses parallelism by dropping the conjunction and', a modification problem results because the participial phrase creating ... attaches to the noun checks, thus distorting the meaning of the last element of the parallel construction.



原因2,protecting〉〉好于used to protect ,更简洁



我的问题,为什么答案D中creating basic savings accounts to carry 不能成为 to provide


free cashing of government checks的结果壮语?是以下可能原因吗:to provide free


cashing of government checks的逻辑主语是banks ,而banks provide free cashing of


government checks,creating basic savings accounts to carry 句中creating basic savings


accounts to carry 优先成为定语???怎么感觉这么怪啊???



请牛牛指点,怎样区分在句末的定语修饰和壮语修饰啊?我发现自己问了个和楼主一样的问题。


又重新看了原贴,还是糊涂啊。


请牛牛指点。

37#
发表于 2004-5-20 07:07:00 | 只看该作者
up!
38#
发表于 2004-5-26 10:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stoneren在2004-5-17 4:43:00的发言:

请问一下:39-B/D的as为什么是incorrect?


as 可不可以作为介词,解释为“作为”,不太理解'as a protection of为什么是错的。请哪位侠士指点。

39#
发表于 2004-5-26 11:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用babypace在2004-5-26 10:23:00的发言:


as 可不可以作为介词,解释为“作为”,不太理解'as a protection of为什么是错的。请哪位侠士指点。


39D. For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, as a protection of warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

"as" is typically used to compare people/objects/ideas in the same class. There are examples from Longman:


As a parent, I feel that more should be done to protect our children.
A large flat stone was used as a table.
Dad dressed up as Santa Claus.
The result of last week's election will be seen as a victory for the right-wing government.


"items of military equipment" and a protection aren't in the same class. the use of "items of military equipment" may be.


多多讨论...

40#
发表于 2004-5-26 11:57:00 | 只看该作者
我以为是"animal-hide shields" "as a protection of",shields 和protection是不是一个class?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-3 00:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部