ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 15143|回复: 76
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这, 大概就是我们中国人GMAT必须考730的原因吧

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-20 17:20:00 | 只看该作者

这, 大概就是我们中国人GMAT必须考730的原因吧

============================================

或者, CD也在其中起到了副作用也说不定

我知道这是半年前的文章, 只是想发上来大家讨论一下.

==========================================================

http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/jan2006/bs2006015_2198_bs001.htm

===============================================================

In China, GMAT Cheaters May Prosper
 

Some Chinese B-school candidates' studying methods are less than aboveboard as they struggle to avoid poverty by securing spots at top universities
  

With the score he received on the Graduate Management Admissions Test (GMAT), the 21-year-old finance student at Shanghai's Fudan University easily could have been admitted to a top-ten U.S. B-school. He scored 650 out of a possible 800 points -- a score that's 58 points above the Chinese national average, but one he considers so low that it nearly brings him to tears. So he hit the books this summer, studying several hours a day to prepare for a second shot at the exam. He also did something a lot of would-be MBAs in China are doing these days: He peeked at the test.
        
  
  


On a Chinese-language Web site, GMAT test takers disclose questions they have memorized so that others can use them. It's a violation of the GMAT confidentiality agreement, but it's a remarkably efficient way to study. Some students say that half the questions they encounter on the test were previously posted on the site.

"DO-OR-DIE SITUATION."  In the hypercompetitive world of Chinese B-school admissions, students say the Web site is an advantage that's too good to pass up. And the strategy apparently works: The combination of book studying and online test preparation added 40 points to the Fudan student's score when he retook the test in September. Says his roommate, who scored 720 in June: "If everyone else is using it, why would we put ourselves at a disadvantage?"

The GMAT isn't the only admissions exam to test the mettle -- and determine the fate -- of young Chinese students. The national university entrance boards, China's version of the Scholastic Aptitude Test, is a grueling three-day exam that determines if they'll enter one of China's elite universities. The stakes are so high that public buses change their routes each June to avoid disturbing students; cities invoke noise ordinances; and parents seek professional psychiatric counseling for their teenagers -- all to help ambitious high school seniors do as well as they can on the test.

"For these kids, this is a do-or-die situation," says Rolf Cremer, dean of the China Europe International Business School, an educator in China for two decades. In the starkest circumstances, "a high score means the best universities China can offer, and a low one -- lifelong poverty."

STEPPING UP SECURITY.  So the temptation to cut corners is immense. To stem security breaches, the Graduate Management Admissions Council (GMAC), the GMAT's overseer, must work harder in China. Some security measures are already built into the GMAT. The test, taken on computers, is programmed to choose new questions based on the answers to previous questions -- making it virtually impossible for two students to take the same exam.

Yet such measures have been defeated before. The Graduate Record Examination, a graduate-school admissions test administered by Princeton (N.J.)-based Educational Testing Service, takes similar precautions. But in 2002, a sudden rise in verbal scores among GRE test takers in some Asian countries led ETS to suspect that students were sharing questions. ETS now requires test takers in China, Korea, and Taiwan to use GRE's one-time-use paper version for everything but essay questions.

Students taking the GMAT already encounter a raft of security measures, including cameras, videotaping, and fingerprinting. In January, when a new test administrator takes over for ETS, security will be ramped up even further, GMAC says.

MORAL AMBIGUITY.  Even so, no security system is perfect. In 2003, GMAC, along with ETS, sued the New Oriental School, China's largest test-preparation service, alleging that it gave students copies of actual exam questions that were then in use. Last December, China's highest court awarded GMAC and ETS $774,000 in damages and a public apology.

New Oriental says it has since cleaned up its act, but others have rushed in to fill the void. Several Web sites and university bulletin boards purport to have potential GMAT questions and other helpful hints for beating the system. The site used by the two Fudan students goes a step further, supplying verbatim questions from the test.

In the intense fight for B-school admission and all the advantages it confers, many Chinese students believe the end justifies the means. In the business world, such moral ambiguity is often a prelude to disaster. Apparently that's a lesson every generation has to learn for itself.
 
==============================================================================

GMAT Scores by Country of Citizenship for 2001-2005 - 3 of 6

  (Please Note the Competitive Score for China)

 [attachimg]50759[/attachimg]
[attachimg]50760[/attachimg]

====================================================================================

GMAT and Application Trends - Asia and India
    

 

[attachimg]50764[/attachimg]
[attachimg]50765[/attachimg]
[attachimg]50766[/attachimg]

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-21 8:29:15编辑过]

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
沙发
发表于 2006-9-20 18:43:00 | 只看该作者

……

板凳
发表于 2006-9-20 18:49:00 | 只看该作者

黑猫白猫,抓的到老鼠就是好猫。中国的历史,就是团结起来和帝国主义各种手段抗争的历史!!

这年头什么伦理都白扯,实力最重要。

地板
发表于 2006-9-20 20:15:00 | 只看该作者

想了想,还是忍不住说点什么

首先所谓道德问题,我可以肯定地是,如果美国人有这样的机会,能够知道考试的内容,他们也会这么做。我还可以肯定地是,就算没有JJ,一对一的单挑,美国人一样考不过我们。并不是说会考试多么了不起,但这是事实。我们的教育体系决定了我们就是会考试,而gmat再不过,也就是一个考试!

最重要的一点,几乎所有考gmat想去top b-school的人,都在中国已经是前程似锦的人,不过是为了一个更远大的梦想而努力奋斗。所以,离poverty这个词,实在太遥远。但就是poverty这个词,明显充满了歧视。哪怕我不得不承认作者说的大部分都是事实,而我也多少惭愧,但就因为这个词,我仍然恨不得扇他两个耳光:别提到中国就想到poverty。在窝里呆久了,不知道外面的世界有多大,就漫天不知耻地混说起来。可恨!!!

5#
发表于 2006-9-20 20:30:00 | 只看该作者
严重同意4楼的!!!
6#
发表于 2006-9-20 20:36:00 | 只看该作者

可是,惟实力论也是一种伦理啊,

而且属于一种并不太高明的虚无主义伦理观,

呵呵

7#
发表于 2006-9-20 20:44:00 | 只看该作者
就像美国人一边指责中国没有知识产权卖盗版,一边跑襄阳路狂购物的道理一样。
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-20 20:58:00 | 只看该作者

我自己的想法是,

区别不在中国"人"或者美国"人",

而在于, 美国没有产生这种cracking site的土壤, 是制度和社会发达程度的原因,

而不是简单的所谓(个人的)道德, 伦理问题.

试问: 在美国卖盗版值得么? 貌似上个礼拜多伦多还抓了一批自治DVD的(都是中国/台湾人), 罚了N多万, 叛了N多年.......

9#
发表于 2006-9-20 21:06:00 | 只看该作者

原文有一定的道理

8楼的看法我很同意 中国社会制度远没有美国发达和健康

只能是一声长长的sigh...

不过还好我们现在不去喊解放全人类了,有进步


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-20 21:08:48编辑过]
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-20 21:51:00 | 只看该作者

就像文章中那个复旦的小孩儿说的一样,

你不用, 别人用,

奈若何?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

NTU MBA

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-22 19:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部