ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: donald123
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创]2006年6月Math机经讨论稿第4篇(57-78) 6.16日更新

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-6-16 11:51:00 | 只看该作者

Note: The interpretation here isn't quite correct.  You can skip this and go straight to the 22nd floor for the final solution if you'd like.

以下是引用yaoyao99在2006-6-16 11:06:00的发言:

Ahhh.. thank you 洛拉!  That makes much more sense.

So when x < 1000, interest is about 0.02x and when x > 1000, interest is about 0.02 * 1000 - 0.025 * (x-1000) = 0.025x - 5

1) x = 2000 because 0.025 * (x-1000) = 25 => interest from 2% = 20 less than interest from 2.5%

2) when x < 1000, there's only interest from 2%

when x > 1000, interst is about 0.02*3*1000 from 2% and 0.025*3*(x-1000) from 2.5%

interest from 2% = 60 whereas interest from 2.5% = 0.075x - 75 (inconclusive without the value of x)

Answer is A?

这道题我算完觉得如果2%时利息是25元,那么选C,如果是65元,就得选E

因为过程实在太长,我只写个大概意思,分情况讨论,不是复利息嘛,就分成第一种情况:x *(1+2%)只出现了1年(由25元得出一个本金1,代入蓝色的式子里),后面2年因为都超过了1000元所以用2.5%的利率,即{[x* (1+2%)] * (1+2.5%) ^2} - [x *(1+2)]),第二种情况:x *(1+2%)出现了2年(由25元得出本金2代入红色的式子里),只有最后1年是2.5%的利率, 即{[x *(1+2%)] ^2} * (1+2.5%) -  [x *(1+2%)] ^2), 得出两种情况的利息看看是否都一致地大于或者小于25元,如果一致则选C,如果不一致,就选E无法判定。如果是按天计算复利息也同理分成类似上述两种情况就行了。

版主看看对不对?


22#
发表于 2006-6-16 12:30:00 | 只看该作者

, I see what you mean now.  What about this:

2) Interest from year 1 = x * 0.02 (assume x < 1000), let the total $ in the bank at the end of year 2 = x2 and the total at the end of year 3 = x3

year 2
total interest 
at 2nd year end
year 3
total interest 
at 3rd year end
total interest 
from 2%
total interest 
from 2.5%
1
x2 < 1000
x * 1.02 * 1.02 – x
x3 > 1000
x * 1.02 * 1.02 * 1.025 - x
0.04x
0.066x – 0.04x 
= 0.026x
< 0.04x
2
x2 > 1000
x * 1.02 * 1.025 - x
x3 > 1000
x * 1.02 * 1.025 * 1.025 - x
0.02x
0.071x – 0.02x
= 0.051x
> 0.04x

Now let's look at condition 1)

If interest from 2% is $65, then both case 1 and 2 are invalid (x > 1000).  => invalid condition?

If
   
interest from 2.5% is $25, then it's also an invalid condition:

case 1: 0.026x = 25 => x = $960 (invalid) => x3 < 1000 and case 2: 0.051x = 25 => x =  $490 (invalid) => x3 < 1000

If interest from 2% is $25, then:

case 1: 0.04x = 25 => x = $625 (valid) => we know that interest from 2.5% < interest from 2%

case 2: 0.02x = 25 => x =  $1250 (invalid, we assumed x, the principal, to be less than 1000 at the beginning of the first year) 

answer C (only interest from 2% is $25 is a valid condition)

Note, (1+n%)^m 约等于 (1+n%*m), based on Taylor's Expansion (for (1 + alpha)^x, when alpha is reasonably small, the value is approximately 1 + alpha*x).  This should save you some time on the test even if it says interest compounded daily/month/whatever.  In case the numbers are different, you can calculate the interest as compounded annually even if it says compounded several times during the year.

Simple interest: interest = principal * annual interest rate * num of years

Interst compounded annually: interest = principal * (1 + annual interest rate) ^ number of years - principal

Interst compounded several times during the year:

interest = principal * (1 + annual interest rate / num of times interest is compounded) ^ (num of times interest is compounded * num of years) - principal


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-16 22:18:16编辑过]
23#
发表于 2006-6-16 13:29:00 | 只看该作者

Note: The final solution is summarized in the 22nd floor. 

以下是引用yaoyao99在2006-6-16 12:30:00的发言:

, I see what you mean now.  What about this:

2) Interest from year 1 = x * 0.02 (assume x < 1000)

case

year 2

total interest at year end

year 3

total interest at year end

1

x2 < 1000

x* 1.02*1.02 – x

x3 > 1000

x* 1.02*1.02 * 1.025 – x

2

x2 > 1000

x *1.02 * 1.025 - x

x3 > 1000

x * 1.02 * 1.025 * 1.025 – x

 

At the end of year 3

Case 1: interest from 2% is about 0.04x and interest from 2.5% is about:

0.066x – 0.04x = 0.026x < 0.04x

Case 2: interest from 2% is about 0.02x and interest from 2.5% is about:

0.071x – 0.02x = 0.051x > 0.02x

 

Now back to 1)

If interest from 2% is $25, then

case 1: 0.04x = 25 => x = $625 (valid) => interest from 2.5% < interest from 2%

case 2: 0.02x = 25 => x =  $1250 (invalid, we assumed the principal to be less than 1000)

 

C

版主到底是版主啊!能把乱七八糟的一片列成这么清晰的表!

我再写清楚点儿:设一开始的本金是x

第一种情况:2%的利率只用了1年,x*( 1+2%)的积就已经大于1000元了,此时, x*2%=25, x=1250,于是,1250 * (1 + 2%)* (1 + 2.5%) ^2 - 1250 * ( 1+ 2%) 就等于用2.5% 时产生的利息啦!等于64.546875. 注意这个地方要不是减去最初的本金x,而是减去1250 * (1 + 2%),因为这是适用2.5%利率时的“新的本金”了嘛!我的意思也不知道说清楚没有?这道题出现2个复利息的利率,就相对应2个本金啊,一个是初始本金,一个是初始本金按2%利率计算以后因为超出1000元了就构成了“适用2.5%利率的基础,也就是新本金”,等于让你算,新本金在2.5%的利率情况下产生的利息多呢?还是原始本金在2%的利率情况下产生的利息25元多?

第二种情况:2%的利率用了2年,连本带利才超过1000元能用2.5%,此时 x * (1+2%)^2 - x = 25,x约等于618.8,于是,618.8 * (1 + 2%)^2 * ( 1+ 2.5%)  - 618.8 * (1 + 2%)^2 ,约等于16.094988

多谢多谢版主啊!我这次为了准确用计算器算,才发现自己之前手算有错误,真不好意思误导了你吧?一种情况大于25,一种情况小于25,所以如果题目是25,那也是E了(应是C了,1250那种情况无效)

唉,这种题,算错一点都白费

辛苦版主了!再看看对吗?


24#
发表于 2006-6-16 13:42:00 | 只看该作者

Hee hee, I just fixed my answer in 第 22 楼 and added the various versions of condition 1.  What do you think?

Here's the table again, summarizing what you wrote:

 
year 2
total interest at year end
year 3
total interest at year end
Interest 
from 2%
Interest from 2.5%
情况2
x2 < 1000
x* 1.02*1.02 – x
x3 > 1000
x* 1.02*1.02 * 1.025 - x
0.04x
0.066x – 0.04x 
= 0.026x
情况1
x2 > 1000
x *1.02 * 1.025 - x
x3 > 1000
x * 1.02 * 1.025 * 1.025 - x
0.02x
0.071x – 0.02x
= 0.051x

Note: x=1250 isn't a valid answer because we assumed x < 1000

BTW, (1+n%)^m 约等于 (1+n%*m), based on Taylor's Expansion.  That should save you some time on the test, in case the numbers are different. 


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-16 14:00:15编辑过]
25#
发表于 2006-6-16 14:21:00 | 只看该作者

Note: The final solution is summarized in the 22nd floor. 

以下是引用yaoyao99在2006-6-16 13:42:00的发言:

Hee hee, I just fixed my answer in 第 22 楼 and added the various versions of condition 1.  What do you think?

Here's the table again, summarizing what you wrote:

 
year 2
total interest at year end
year 3
total interest at year end
Interest 
from 2%
Interest from 2.5%
情况2
x2 < 1000
x* 1.02*1.02 – x
x3 > 1000
x* 1.02*1.02 * 1.025 - x
0.04x
0.066x-0.04x 
= 0.026x
情况1
x2 > 1000
x *1.02 * 1.025  - x
          
x3 > 1000
x * 1.02 * 1.025 * 1.025 - x
0.02x
0.071x – 0.02x
= 0.051x

Note: x=1250 isn't a valid answer because we assumed x < 1000

BTW, (1+n%)^m 约等于 (1+n%*m), based on Taylor's Expansion.  That should save you some time on the test, in case the numbers are different. 

版主,应该保留你的原表,我改动你的表时顾此失彼了。你列表的方法很值得学习!感谢帮助!!


26#
发表于 2006-6-16 14:24:00 | 只看该作者
真希望考试时候不要遇到这种题!否则像我这种学文科的,计算能力又差,算不了几步就晕菜了!
27#
发表于 2006-6-16 14:35:00 | 只看该作者

Note: The final solution is summarized in the 22nd floor. 

But x * 1.02 * 1.025 - x * 1.02 gives you the interest from the 2nd year ONLY.  I'm doing accummulated interest where the "total interest at 2nd year end" = interest from year 1 + interest from year 2 and "total interest at 3rd year end" = TOTAL interest from year 1 to 3

I don't understand how you got to the equations in the final column (interest from 2.5%).

Your equation x* 1.02*1.02 * 1.025 - x*(1.02)*(1.02) already gave you interest from 2.5% (interest from the 3rd year ONLY) which is the same as what I have 1.066x - 1.04x = 0.026x. 

Similarly, your equation  x * 1.02 * 1.025 * 1.025 - x*(1.02) gave you interest from 2.5% in 情况1, which is the same as what I have as well, 1.071x - 1.02x = 0.051x.

Anyway, I think the answer is C because only 第二种情况 is valid so we know interest from 2% is greater than interest from 2.5%.  Assuming interest from 2% is $25 and we're calculating interests from a 3 year period. 


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-17 22:29:06编辑过]
28#
发表于 2006-6-16 15:13:00 | 只看该作者

Note: The final solution is summarized in the 22nd floor. 

以下是引用yaoyao99在2006-6-16 14:35:00的发言:

But x * 1.02 * 1.025 - x * 1.02 gives you the interest from the 2nd year ONLY.  I'm doing accummulated interest where the "total interest at 2nd year end" = interest from year 1 + interest from year 2 and "total interest at 3rd year end" = TOTAL interest from year 1 to 3

I don't understand how you got to the equations in the final column (interest from 2.5%).

Your equation x* 1.02*1.02 * 1.025 - x*(1.02)*(1.02) already gave you interest from 2.5% (interest from the 3rd year ONLY) which is the same as what I have 1.066x - 1.04x = 0.026x. 

Similarly, your equation  x * 1.02 * 1.025 * 1.025 - x*(1.02) gave you interest from 2.5% in 情况1, which is the same as what I have as well, 1.071x - 1.02x = 0.051x.

Anyway, I think the answer is C because only 第二种情况 is valid so we know interest from 2% is greater than interest from 2.5%.  Assuming interest from 2% is $25 and we're calculating interests from a 3 year period. 

感谢版主指出我的纰漏!讨论还是给我很大帮助的!


29#
发表于 2006-6-16 17:05:00 | 只看该作者
我忽略了1250无效的情况,同意选C。
30#
发表于 2006-6-16 20:21:00 | 只看该作者


   70
. 一点(45X轴对称点的坐,注意reflection.始我以是映射呢果没答案,果是称点
答案:(4-5

[討論]這是以x轴為中線對摺後得的結果.

映射是虾米东东?应该以前高中学过,但是过了太久了,偶只是听过完全没有概念了。。。

谢谢~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 22:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部