- UID
- 2301
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-4-8
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
What a discussion...
Assumption is always a gap-filling premise hidden and undisclosed. It is a required condition. Without it, the conclusion is unwarranted.
so we need to find the premises and the conclusion first and understand the reasoning.
The premise is that company did X for A, and Y happened. Conclusion is that the company can do X for B, and Y will happen (it is not manifested, only hinted) You can see that the premises contains some reasoning (premises and conclusion) itself.
Now we can test the choices:
C is wrong. If not C, the conclusion can still hold. C does not fill any gap. For C to be right, there should be somehting in the sentence that reads like "the copywriter and graphic artist used their patented design...and the company want the same design for both clothing and houseware catalogues". So C simply stated one possible scenario, not an assumption.
Let's look at D. If not D "a magazinelike format does not require a copywriter and a graphic artist", can the conclusion still hold? I say YES. Put it this way, a company does not necessarily need a copywriter and a graphic artist to do the magazinelike format. But this statement does not dampen the reasoning that a company can use a copywriter and a graphic artist to design the magazinelike format, then appeal to upscale, then improve sales. Allow me to use a simpler example: To get rich does not require winning a lottery, but it cannot rule out that fact that winining a lottery can get people rich.
Now B. If not B "an upscale clientelte would NOT be interested in a housewares catalog", then the link between the premise and the conclusion is broken. You can see that the link the premise is "a copywriter and a graphic designer --> magazinelike format --> appeal to unscale clientile --> improved sale". "Not B" breaks the link, and the conclusion cannot hold any more.
One more comment about "key word". fhlly mentioned that "require" is a magic word in this question and another question jq_jau brought up. However, in the second sample question choice D, "cannot be employed without" has the same meaning as "require". I do not see how one key word can solve a whole problem here.
Comments are welcome. |
|