[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day3

问题不大35

看一下！               

问题不大35

1. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

P：实验表明水泥房子比木房子在加热和降温方面更省钱
C：真实情况下省的更多

预测答案：真实情况和实验室的差别。可能温度、湿度等因素不一样。



2. 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

方案：推出有学生签名和头像的信用卡来买饭
目的：防贼

预测答案（削弱）：员工不一定能辨认/辨认工作量大，直接刷卡


3. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

B

wannatechan

1. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
前提：实验证明：Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses.
结论：cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment
猜测方向：现实生活中，有什么因素会导致Cement houses更加generate cost savings in terms of cooling/heating，或者现实生活中，有什么因素会导致wood houses更不generate cost savings in terms of cooling/heating

2 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
方案式推理
方式：推出信用卡，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来
目的：防贼
猜测方向：直接怼为什么不可行，比如打饭的时候员工根本不看头像等等

3. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
第一件事：不友好的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism.
与第二件事：ban the sign---tourism growth下降冲突
猜测方向：有除了billboards and commercial signs其他因素的影响

chasesky

1

shirleyliu_46

看一下！               

shirleyliu_46

1.        试验条件和显示情况有某种不同
2.        食堂员工没有时间核对信用卡；头像分辨率低，难以辨认；小偷会偷和自己头像很像的人的卡……
3.        B；没有考虑其他影响旅游增长的因素

Holly与六便士

Mark一下！               

anduyin

看一下！               

anduyin

1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

P：水泥的cost saving 比 wood 更多
C：节省成本在实际会比实验的更多
加强方向：找出水泥和wood为啥会在实际中导致区分更大
猜测：实际太阳直射会导致wood散热和制冷更慢，而cement不受影响




2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
GOAl：为了防贼
P：信用卡有学生的前面和头像，可以辨认学生
C：无法减少贼

猜测：贼也可以自己在信用卡上贴自己的照片和头像

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

P：不好的billboards 和signs 会减少旅游业的增加
异常：两个州这样干了旅游业下降了

答案：忽略了其他可能会影响旅游业的因素，比如当时刚好疫情。

zzz1.

看一下！