Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.
Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
153. Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.
Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically. (B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment. (C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants. (D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants. (E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable. 答案是C,我选的是A,我的分析:扩号中已经明确对threshold进行 了说明,threshold由必须增加的price决定.如果solar energy变的 far more cost-efficient,那么如果oil方面没有变化的话,threshold 变小了(也就是oil需要增加的价格减少了),这样,oil价格减少的话 就可以保持threshold不变了.我这样分析有没有问题?C也有道理, 不过关系不够直接,还要由efficiency of oil-fired power plants,推 价格的关系,我觉得还不如A好.但答案是C,为什么?OG的解释是: (Actual oil prices control how far, given the viability threshold, solar power is from economic viability but do not figure in the determination of the threshold, so choices A and E are incorrect.) 我不太明白.
文中说明:Threshold=the price per barrel, 这个价钱在new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants的情况下会have to rise,但是现在是unchanged at thirty-five dollars,所以必然的结论是new solar power plants not to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants, 则推出 Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
如果是的話 為何題目要針對threshold的定義 限定是 "the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise" (特別提出油價呢? 為何不說是 the cost of oil-fired plants wold have to rise to make the solar power more economical) 因為油價的變換的確是會影響threshold 但不但表示絕對性的影響,所以我覺得很奇怪,為何定義要針對油價
既然石油价格只是石油发电厂成本中的一部分,那么4楼和6楼的公式都不对把,题目中关于threshold的定义是: the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants,既然是"rise", 那一定和石油的现价密切相关,试用公式表示如下: