ChaseDream
搜索
12345
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: gerf123
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Gwd 8 25-28

[复制链接]
41#
发表于 2008-12-8 23:58:00 | 只看该作者

这篇文章太晦涩了

看几句话又不知道前面说的什么了

又重头开始读

多谢2楼斑斑的分析

文章脉络分析得很透彻

膜拜中~~

42#
发表于 2009-4-11 18:03:00 | 只看该作者

25题A和C都有道理,但是C更像是文章的主要内容,而不像是作者的写作目的。难道作者洋洋洒洒写了这么多,目的仅仅是 consider 克拉克对布雷沃曼的挑战?

considerlongman)

think about [intransitive and transitive]
            
to think about something carefully, especially before making a choice or decision
:
    

"考虑"结束之后还是要做出一个选择或者是决定来的,而作者的选择就是支持“技术决定论”。

哎,头都大了
43#
发表于 2009-5-17 10:24:00 | 只看该作者

OG12上面出现这篇文章了,引用25题答案如下:

The passage introduces Clark's study as a solid contribution to the debate between technological determinists and social constructivists.  In the second paragraph, Braverman is introduced as holding a position of social constructivism, a position that Clark takes issue with.  In the final paragraph, the passage holds that C refutes the extremes of the constructivists, and C's arguments challenging social constructivism are then described.

A: The passage takes no position on the merits of technological change but is concerned only with the role of such change in society.

C: Correct.  The passage is mainly concerned with portraying C's view as a successful challenge to constructivism.

23楼的mm很强!

44#
发表于 2010-3-10 13:04:47 | 只看该作者
最最最感谢wangyu73cn版主每次细致入微的讲解,祝今后工作生活顺利。
45#
发表于 2011-6-23 22:37:53 | 只看该作者
第一个答案是 C
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-15 06:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部