ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The difficulty with the proposed high-speed train line is that a used plane can be bought for one-third the price of the train line, and the plane, which is just as fast, can fly anywhere. The train would be a fixed linear system, and we live in a world that is spreading out in all directions and in which consumers choose the freewheel systems (cars, buses, aircraft), which do not have fixed routes. Thus a sufficient market for the train will not exist.

Which of the following, if true, most severely weakens the argument presented above?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 16811|回复: 26
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-96

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-7-23 20:51:00 | 只看该作者

OG-96

96.The difficulty with the proposed high-speed train line is that a used plane can be bought for one-third the price of the train line , and the plane, which is just as fast ,can fly anywhere,The train would be a fixed linear system, and we live in a world that is spreading out in all directions and in which consumer choose the free-wheel systems(cars,buses,aircraft), which do not have fixed routes. Thus a sufficient market for the train will not exist.
Which of the following,if true ,most severely weakens the argument presented above?
A. Cars,buses,and planes require the efforts of drivers and pilots to guide them,whereas the train will be guided mechanically
C. Planes are not a free-wheel system because they can fly only between airports,which are less convenient for consumers than the high-speed train's stations would be.
I choose A ,the Ans is C
我认为,题目中不仅仅说了飞机,也提到了bus等,所以答案中也不应该只有飞机,请指教


推荐
发表于 2012-11-3 17:15:14 | 只看该作者
(OG-11)  113. The difficulty with the proposed high-speed train line is that a used plane can be bought for one-third the price of the train line, and the plane, which is just as fast, can fly anywhere. The train would be a fixed linear sustem, and we live in a world that is spreading out in all directions and in which consumers choose the free-wheel systems (cars, buses, aircraft), which do not have fixed routes. Thus a sufficient market for the train will not exist.

Which of the following, if true, most severely weakens the argument presented above?
A.Cars, buses, and planes require the efforts of drivers and pilots to guide them, whereas the train will be guided mechanically.
B.Cars and buses are not nearly as fast as the high-speed train will be.
C.Planes are not a free-wheel system because they can fly only between airports, which are less convenient for consumers than the high-speed train’s stations would be.
D.The high-speed train line cannot use currently underutilized train stations in large cities.
E.For long trips, most people prefer to fly rather than to take ground-level transportation.
【解析】通过寻找缺陷就会发现,说火车不是一个free-wheel系统,那么火车市场就不存在,然而说不定火车还有别的好处。文章第一句是飞机与火车的对比,第二句是火车与free-wheel systems的对比,而free-wheel systems可以包括cars,buses还有aircraft。从全局观念看,文章应该是火车与飞机的对比。
A选项说,汽车,公交车,飞机要求司机和飞行员指导它们,而火车是自动驾驶的。(这是火车的好处,很像是削弱的。但是,汽车,公交车,飞机在前提中出现在括号里,是用来说明什么是free-wheel的,而不是火车真正对比的对象。文章的focus在于飞机与火车的对比。)
B选项说,汽车和公交车并没有像火车那么快。(这个也是火车的好处,速度快,应该也是削弱。不是原文的focus,没有飞机)
C选项说,飞机不是一个free-wheel系统,因为它们只能在机场附近飞行,而对于消费者来说,机场不如火车站方便。(这个选项也是削弱,比起A与B更紧扣原文,只比较了飞机和火车。注意,原文的free-wheel是指没有固定的轨道,而这个选项的free-wheel是指起点和终点的不固定,故选项没有反驳前提。)
D,E加强结论,排除。

【小结】本题难点在于对文章与选项的free-wheel的理解,以及理解括号的内容是用来解释说明的作用。选择C的原因有:1.这个选项只是飞机与火车对比,符合原文真正强调的内容;2.选项出现貌似反对前提的词语,实际上与前提的意思不一样,只是一种借壳假设;3. C选项与原文最贴切,都提到了路线。

【译】高速火车的困难在于,一架旧飞机购买的价格只有火车的三分之一,并且飞机与高铁一样快,可以飞到任何地方。火车是一个固定的线性系统,而且我们生活在一个四通八达的世界当中,消费者选择一个free-wheel系统(比如小轿车、公交车和飞机),他们并没有固定的线路。因此,一个有效的火车市场将不会存在。
沙发
发表于 2003-7-24 11:16:00 | 只看该作者
其实我觉得这道题中,提到bus等

只是在说明飞机是一种free-wheel system时顺带提的

这道题的主干还是讲飞机和火车

大家认为呢?
板凳
发表于 2005-7-6 13:38:00 | 只看该作者
同意楼上,呵呵。
地板
发表于 2005-8-12 19:52:00 | 只看该作者
one-third the price of the train line , a fixed linear system这两点应该是high-speed train line 的缺点吧,针对这两点来削弱才对嘛
5#
发表于 2005-9-6 08:33:00 | 只看该作者
我一开始做的时候也错在了以为只提飞机太片面,结果选了A呢
6#
发表于 2005-11-15 21:42:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得题干中的结论是Thus a sufficient market for the train will not exist. 注意这个thus往往是conclusion的标志。


既然是在考虑这个train到底应不应该存在的问题,而题干中又主要是用aircraft来比较,因此不存在只提飞机太片面的问题。

7#
发表于 2005-12-2 15:39:00 | 只看该作者

问个弱弱的问题,什么叫free-wheel system啊?


金山词霸的解释是“靠惯性滑行”,不明白:(

8#
发表于 2005-12-3 05:45:00 | 只看该作者

1) in the first part, there is a comparison between plane and train.


2) Q: choose the free-wheel systems(cars,buses,aircraft), which do not have fixed routes


A: Planes are not a free-wheel system


9#
发表于 2006-5-1 15:22:00 | 只看该作者

答案是不是把前提否定了啊?


文中说  free-wheel systems(cars,buses,aircraft),


答案:Planes are not a free-wheel system


不懂!


请教NN!

10#
发表于 2006-5-1 15:47:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得是否定前提了,前提中认为飞机便宜且,能够fly anywhere, have no fixed routes,是free-wheel system. C否定了这一点,认为,飞机只能在机场之间飞,不是free-wheel system。


A 是无关选项。全文都在提free-wheel system,而A提到了guide,无关。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 05:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部