个人认为对公众的误倒主要在于原先暗示的内容和实际内容是否一致, 而petition 只提到"statewide smoking restriction" , 对选民的暗示只能看出对禁烟范围方面的暗示(即全州范围), 并没有禁烟程度或其他的暗示; 而实际上"banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public."可能在范围上和全州有差异(但也可能相同), 而B 选项说在rural基本没有retail establishments and in government offices ,使禁烟的实际范围缩小了造成误倒公众.
C选项的local stronger Vs State, 并没有在petition 时"statewide smoking restriction" ,中提到, 既然无这方面暗示,怎能称得上误倒呢?
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances every corner of state?
题干中的gap就在于:statewide smoking restriction --- The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.