C. The honeybee’s stinger, heavily barbed and staying where it is inserted, results in the fact that ....
划线部分是一个非限定修饰,而非限定修饰只表示这个整体的特点(限定修饰是“整体中的局部”概念);因此此句实际上在说,“所有的”stinger results in the fact that .... 这是荒谬的(句子的主干The honeybee’s stinger results in the fact that .... 不也就在这么说么?)
E. The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that ...
", with"结构在句末通常是歧义,因为可以就近修饰也可以修饰主语(谓语)表伴随;however,在本句中,", with"结构只能修饰主语(谓语)表伴随,因此没有歧义。
6楼关于with the result that和result in something 的区别也很有说服力。
Wait for more comments.
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-7 16:59:46编辑过] |