【每日阅读训练第四期——速度越障17系列】【17-20 】经管

vividlai

1-1'05
google plans to introduce its google glass
it is known that google makes money on advertisement, but google is abusing its dominance of online search

2-1'04
in A's opnion, google has four big problems
1.google favors its own searches over specialized competitors
2.google is pinching competitors' content
3.some owners only give google the right to provide ads for them
4.its difficult for the website owners to transfer from google to other search engine

3-1'31
if google faces the market test, it will be bound to be overseen by 5years
google's detractors only believe what they have seen in newspapers, while some have read enough about the problem
after google publishes its google glass, maybe it will be accused of abusing its dominance of wearable computing platforms

4-1'20
many people may feel like to share his own opnion at the beginning of the meeting, but they may find them can not get a word in, and then they may just give up, checking their emails and waiting for the end of the meeting
the fear of rejection may be the main cause of this phenomenon, if people feel to be excluded from a certain circles, they may be less innovative, productive or collaborative
but managers who know this phenonmenon may have ways to solve this problem

5-1'27
1.choosing a round table rather than a rectangular one may make everyone feels equal in a meeting, which may reduce the rejection feeling in the brain and let the brain into a collaborative status
2. Start with a shared reality, let everyone who will attend the meeting knows the agenda, or give them an inspring passage and let them share what encourages them most in the passage, this action will make people understand others' opnions more easily
3.encourage candor and caring, listen carefully and understand what colleagues are really thinking ,and thanks them for sharing their opnion, try to make them feel less likely to be threatened by rejection
try to make your employees feel collaborative

obstacle
3'57
benchmark sometimes reveal surprising findings, statsitcs show that NGOs spend more than 80% to track finance and employ, twice as many as finance staff in multinationals
due to the restricitons, NGOs struggle to gain the master place, with the globalization, those who dot their companies all over the world may feel it essential to build a administrative infrastructure
many NGOs today struggle to grow the essential management capabilities and systems required to effectively manage their operations and growth
the cost of bookkeeping suggest that NGOs are spending to much on administration, while they spend only little money on information technology, making them be extremely slowly on reporting
NGOs need to invest in core administrative and technical capabilities
the right way to judge the investment in the company is to check every dollar's impact rather than rating the overhead cost


structure
a phenomenon about NGO- why does it occur, an analogy of multinationals to NGOs-the negative effect of spending too much money on administration- a solution to the NGOs' problems- a right way to evaluate the investment

铁板神猴

these articles are awesome! thanks, Makayla~

1'12''
1'29''
1'27''
1'22''
1'59''

4'40''

AquariusL

呃，今天第一天开始入队做训练，感触很多啊。楼上各位速度和理解也太强了吧，看得我都不好意思贴自己的了。。Anyway, 好久没有限时看文章了，各种生疏，速度那5篇还好吧，不过读的还很慢，要加油。越障那篇，花了些时间读，但也没读的很懂，读完后背着文章写了下frame。In one word, 加油！~如果坚持下来，应该会在理解和速度上长进不少吧。好了，不废话了，贴下时间和总结。

S1: 02:09; S2: 02:41; S3: 02:04; S4: 01:30; S5: 01:48 O: 06:00
At first, the author seems to support NGO by drawing data from APQC.
Then, he compares multinationals and NGO asserting that NGO focuses on funding support and operations. The using of comparison seems to strengthen
the author's support for NGO.
However, later the author points out that NGO spends too much less than required (1/3 of required), and NGO focuses on overhead rather than on value/dollar.
He proposes that NGO should invest on Admins & Techniques.

Overview: First support, then strengthen, last propose new things.

呃，总结的很烂，大家都飘过吧。。

wjj97171

1‘34
"google makes glasses for developer to use in app.
We should see how google operate in EU"
1'44
MM spell out 4 concerns
1'54

1'48
"what Rejection usual presents;Rejection change lots of things;
managers who notice it can solve it;"
1'51
three ways to break rejection.
6'21
Benchmark data occasionally reveal surprisingly that NGO spend more on finance than multination.This is contrary to what we thought before.Why?NGOs,just like multination,struggle to manage their operation in global.NGOs spend less on information technology because of absence of efficient financial management system.But the path to overcome this starvation syndrome is easy to see but diffcult to tread.

绝望的小老鼠

貌似有点上道了~~~ 谢谢风随心动，越障材料逻辑很赞~~  ^ ^

1. Google want to spread its glass, which related to advertising, absuing and the like.
2.4 problems needed to be solved:
    1) previlage over rivals
    2) pinching rivals' content
    3) exclusive deal sin
    4) ads transferring difficulty

3.market test will begin, and unsurprisingly, there are detractors. But googles' antitrust battle will continue.

4.A phenomenon: you are "exculded" from groups you want to join. But there are ways to break this embarrassing cases.

5.AS an executive you could do:
   1)prepare a room for trust
   2)opening words: I would like to share and care about your feelings.
   3)Any endeavor taking advantage for cooperating and welcoming each other is appreciated.

越障框架：

本文主题： 非政府机构在“会计”上的投资比跨国公司还高
现象——尽管看起来不太像真的，但是与跨国公司相比，非政府机构的确在花更多的钱进行预算，计划，报表 etc。
原因——NGO需要计划如何运营庞大的管理系统。（这很像十几年前的跨国公司）
details： 1) NGO的管理过于分散和多头。
              2) NGO的高级管理人员错误地只关注收入增长，并认为适当的超支是收入增长的合理代价。
              3)没有有效的金融预算系统
解决办法：
               1）funders 要更加小心谨慎。
               2）只专注于核心的管理，项目的经费支付。
               3）禁止超支。

绝望的小老鼠

iamyingjie 发表于 2013-4-25 07:49
谢谢风随心动^_^

17-20

yingjie ~~   喜欢认真的人~~   期待你的材料ing~~

杀G给猴看

1 - 01:12
2 - 01:22
3 - 01:18
4 - 01:20
5 - 01:29
obstacle - 04:29

晓野的野

1:46
google's new product and google's change.
2:08
Mr Almunia's four concern.
2:12
Let people to comment on the proposal and amend it. Some google's detractors talk about the google's drawbacks. And google’s antitrust battles may not end here.
1:55
The author introduce a situation of rejection, explain why it shws up and give us some managers advive to deal with this situation.
2:06
Three pieces of advice.
5:26
MI:The discussion about why global NGOs spend more to track their finances and employ more finance staff as comparable for-profit multinationals.
Structure:
>>>>> Introduce us a situation and explain how strange this situation is.
>>>>> The development of NGOs and NGOs' changes
   >> Many NGOs today struggle to grow the essential management capabilities and systems.
   >> Decentralized, program-focused operations also squander precious dollars.
>>>>> NGOs information technology are comparatively low.
>>>>> What should NOG funders do.
>>>>> What should NGO board menbers do.
>>>>> What should NGO leaders do.

jay871750293

谢谢LZ~~~

1‘44
2’13
1‘51
1’48
1‘57

The benchmark reveals that NGOs are now suffering from an acute and daunting problem, the same setback faced by global corporations when they carried out their globalization.

Then the author analyzes that problem in a specific and definite fashion. Generally speaking, it’s the regulation and administration trouble when NGOs experience their own worldwide spread. In other words, infrastructures and employees are separated in several places owing to the globalization and it’s hard to incorporate them together by the current administrative methods. Unfortunately, unlike the corporations, which are able to invest large amount of money and resources in management, to some degree, NGOs is restricted and constrained by their funders.

Next, the author just describes and delineates those restriction and constraint in graphic details, but I forgot a lot. Concisely speaking, on the one hand, leaders of NGOs began to realize this trouble and indeed invest a lot money in inner administration, but they don’t spend much on IT. On the other hand, the funders acknowledge those investments concerning management and estimate them to be enough. However, that’s not far enough.

Finally, the author proposes his technique to tackle and address this trouble. The solution includes the measures for funders and leaders of NGOs.

gyb192483

TIME1: 01'14'' Google will issue its new product: google glasses. Google even issue the spec of the glasses. But this time google confirmed that they will not issue ads on the glasses. It is one of the important way for google to earn the money by ads. But now it will change the stragety. Its competator Almunia complain google. So google next job is how to conduct its business in european.
TIME2: 01'31'' Mr. Almunia has four concerns about google search. First, whether google will include its competitorin the serarching result. Second, whether google will asure personal's confidental informaiton. third, whether google will allow the hiding person to issue ads. Fourth, whether somebody can transfer the ads campaign to other places. Google states that they will do a good job on these four concerns
TIME3: 01'34'' Google still needs to do the market test. The settlement will not be reached until the test result comes out. Nobody can predicate the result. Maybe the result is satisfied and Mr.Almunia will sue google to the court. Google still has long way to go and it should be ready for fight against possible complaint. Its glass may incur the complaint from wearable computering industry.
TIME4: 01'19'' You come late for the meeting and you don't get channce to express yourself or participate the whole activity. Then for the whole day after the meeting you get depress and you are not creative. People may experience and the bleak effect may last for hours.  But a good manager should know how to solve this problem by himself and even he can help his team member solve the same problem. There are some crutical steps to solve this problem
TIME5: 01'31'' Use a round table to let your team member fell that everyone is equal. Second, list the agenda before the meeting. Ask your team members to put theri own opinion into the meeting topic. Third, learn to listen to your team members and be a good listener

Obstacle: 04'28''
Main idea: state that the finanical system and administrtive system of NGO should change
Attitude of the author: negtive
Structure:
==> take the data regarding the the quantity of the finanical stuff and the expense on information collection
==> states that the efficiency of finanical system and administrtive system of NGO is low
==> samples are given to verify the statement
==> The profit company also face the same problem at he beginning of this centry and now NGO faces the problem  too
==> Descripe the difficulity of changing
==> But since most of the founder have their coporation, they should konw how to do