求问OG13 CR39题！个人觉得B、C选项没啥区别啊……TT

杀G给猴看

OG13 CR39

Which ofthe following most logically completes the argument?

Sviatovin is amedieval Moringian text whose author and exact date of composition are unknown.However, the events in the life of Prince Sviatov that the text describesoccurred in 1165, and in the diagram of Sviatov’s family that accompanies thetext his father, who died in 1167, is identified as still living. Thus Sviatovin must have been written between 1165 and 1167, assumingthat    .

(A) the life of Prince Sviatov is not thesubject of any other medieval Moringian texts

(B) the author of Sviatovin intended it to provide as accurate a report about PrinceSviatov’s exploits as possible

(C) the diagram accurately represents thecomposition of Sviatov’s family at the time Sviatovin was written

(D) Sviatovin is theearliest Moringian text whose composition can be dated to within a few years

(E) Sviatovin was notwritten by Sviatov’s father himself

正确答案是C。

我觉得B和C没啥区别啊……我觉得C讲的是关于1167年这个下限的正确性，而B讲的是关于1165年这个上限的正确性：因为author把S的事迹写得尽量准确，所以这些时间参考才会是有价值的，我们才能推断这个书的确是65-67年间写的。而且我觉得，如果B正确了，那么C就也是正确的，因为author要使故事尽量真实，用的图谱就应该是准确的啊……所以基于这个考虑，我就没选C……TT

事实证明我的思维肯定是有问题的……是因为我对exploits的理解错了吗？（所以exploits应该是无关选项？）

请大家帮帮忙啦！

芳芳钟

B 是as accurate as possible, 不代表真得accurate.

杀G给猴看

哦……没有别的区别吗？

OG上的解释是：issues about the accurate reporting of Sviatov's exploits (or about the author's intention to report them accurately) are irrelevant to the argument, which hinges on the accuracy of the diagram that accompanies the tex. The diagram does not report Sviatov's exploits.

为什么OG说他的exploits是irrelevant呢？不理解。感觉OG有些“先入为主”的就一定说问题在于diagram的准确性，而不是其他。为什么呢？我觉得OG对B的解释主要focus在那个exploit上面，所以还是想搞明白那个到底是怎么回事

891758149

题目的主体是讲 “Sviatovin”这个集体的 ， Sviatovin is amedieval Moringian text。

逻辑链是 ：1165 王子死了， 补充text的S集体图表表明1165王子死时他爸还在， 1167 他爸死了 ——  所以集体是写在1165-1167

答案:只要图表是正确的 逻辑链就成立。

B 说的只是要把王子的功绩尽可能写的准确

slgbond

结论是 Thus那句话between 1165 and 1167
推理的主题还是关于时间
B 王子的准确功绩
C 家谱的准确书写时间

楼主，您说哪个合适？

杀G给猴看

谢谢LS和LSS，看来答案还是要尽量direct啊！

euphemiax

求问题目中的那个is identified as still living到底是修饰什么的啊？

杀G给猴看

euphemiax 发表于 2013-3-26 14:55
求问题目中的那个is identified as still living到底是修饰什么的啊？

额，这是个语法问题……看句子结构啦！
原句是：... in the diagram of Sviatov’s family that accompanies the text his father, who died in 1167, is identified as still living.

in the...the text是介词短语 应该是状语，介绍背景的，就是说 在那个图谱里，其中of短语和that定语从句都是修饰diagram的。his father是主语，who died...是非限定性定语从句修饰father的，去掉不改变句子的主要意思，is dentified...是句子的谓语部分啦（so不是修饰语）~~

各个部分我都用不同方式标记了，可以看得更清楚一点

euphemiax

杀G给猴看 发表于 2013-3-26 19:41
额，这是个语法问题……看句子结构啦！
原句是：... in the diagram of Sviatov’s family that accompan ...

谢谢~~解释的好清楚。。。这句话当时看了好久没有看明白。。
看来搞好语法是王道啊！

Hugateddybear

杀G给猴看 发表于 2013-3-24 11:18
谢谢LS和LSS，看来答案还是要尽量direct啊！

同学 这题我还是不懂呢 他爸啥时候死和这书写作时间的下线 有啥关系啊 没看懂啊 翻译成中文我还是没懂！！！你给我说说呗！ 谢了啊 ：D