以后在中国发展应该去INSEAD, LBS还是M7?

l3enny · 发表于 2013-1-12 07:58:16

************

l3enny · 发表于 2013-1-12 08:00:19

Harvard / Stanford估计进不去所以没有在考虑范围内。

wanghongliang · 发表于 2013-1-12 20:25:09

没有本质区别。最终还要看你自己本身的能力，自己本身的能力一般，顶多能享受不到三年顶级商学院给你带来的红利，迟早会露原型的。

chasingM7 · 发表于 2013-1-13 03:48:32

Which one can u get in? This is the first Q to answer. Then ur turn to be picky

ss27 · 发表于 2013-1-13 05:54:51

能进m7的，和能进insead或者lbs的，好像也没啥差距。还是看个人的吧。

l3enny · 发表于 2013-1-13 06:00:46

I would like to apply for all, but since I work 70 - 80 hours per week I don't think I will have time to apply for 8 or 9 schools and put together a quality application for each. The plan is to apply for 4 only. INSEAD and LBS are very strong at my country, but I heard in China European MBAs are not viewed as highly as US MBAs, so I just wanted to check if this is actually the case.

l3enny · 发表于 2013-1-13 06:03:50

thanks for the reply - I definitely agree that there's only so much a brand can give you. Although I do think having a strong alumni network is also important.

The choice right now is down to LBS or Chicago for the fourth school, does anyone know which has a bigger alumni group in China?

Lizzlee · 发表于 2013-1-13 10:27:21

其实现在国内很看重海龟的工作经验…如果工作经验丰富在国内找份好工作不难…

juliewang417 · 发表于 2013-1-13 16:09:33

Wharton and Insead.
LBS是很好的学校但以前在中国录的人不多校友网络还没起来
你如果没有一年两年的concern 沃顿的校友网络在亚洲是非常庞大的广泛渗透到金融和实业的各个角落

By the way I only applied for INSEAD bcoz I cannot find a second school that fits my needs better than INSEAD. 希望今年运气好点

l3enny · 发表于 2013-1-13 16:50:42

谢谢Julie. 如果INSEAD的名声在中国不比美国MBA差那应该也是我的ideal school. 因为毕竟已经在consulting,以后还想做consulting, 所以少交一年前还是很attractive的。

如果说between Chicago and LBS哪个国内比较好？ LBS好像进MBB的比较多，不过就像你说的LinkedIn上在中国的好像人很少, 而且Europe最近经济不好，不知道就业怎么样

以后在中国发展应该去INSEAD, LBS还是M7?

所属分类: 商学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()