[求助]gwd－24－37

rongtt

24-37 Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs. Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same. But new tax breaks will substantially lower the cost of doing business within the city. Therefore, in the future, profit margins will be higher at seafood stores within the city than at suburban seafood stores.

For the purpose of evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to know whether

A)    more fish wholesalers are located within the city than in the surrounding suburbs.

B)    any people who currently own seafood stores in the suburbs surrounding Eastville will relocate their businesses nearer to the city

C)    the wholesale price of fish is likely to fall in the future

D)    fish has always cost about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs.

E)    Seafood stores within the city will in the future set prices that are lower than those at suburban seafood stores.

the referenced answer is E, however, i still have difficult in reasoning by this way. My choice is D.

thanks for help!

leeon

评价题型的答案回答是与否起到支持或削弱原文结论的作用，原文的结论是市区的海产品店比郊区的利润高。

E说市区的海产品店的价格是否比郊区店的低。如果比郊区店价格低，那么原文的结论就不一定成立，如果不是，那么原文结论成立。故为答案。

D说鱼在海产品店的成本在市区和郊区是一样的。原文的信息Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same，已经很明显说明这些成本是一样的。就是税收不一样。所以D的是与否与原文的结论是无关的。

rongtt

非常感谢！我确实有点钻牛角尖，把题目想成assumption了。谢谢这么一目了然的解释！

sunday_zhou

以下是引用leeon在2004-11-8 13:10:00的发言：

评价题型的答案回答是与否起到支持或削弱原文结论的作用，原文的结论是市区的海产品店比郊区的利润高。

E说市区的海产品店的价格是否比郊区店的低。如果比郊区店价格低，那么原文的结论就不一定成立，如果不是，那么原文结论成立。故为答案。

D说鱼在海产品店的成本在市区和郊区是一样的。原文的信息Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same，已经很明显说明这些成本是一样的。就是税收不一样。所以D的是与否与原文的结论是无关的。

可我觉得D是可以的啊：D是表明是否市区和郊区的鱼的成本总是一样的。如果是一样的，考虑到tax的影响，profit才会高啊（结论成立）；如果有可能不一样，比如说即使考虑到tax的影响，其他如运费等的负影响更大，则结论能产生高利润就不一定成立。还有，E说的price和结论的profit不是同样的东东啊，price高低并不能得出profit高低的结论。请指教。

说到这，我觉得D似乎也不是很好，因为没有提到price，只提到cost似乎不够efficient to generate a result that profit will be higher. 但感觉起来似乎更正确...

leeon

要看原文已经给出的信息，海产品店从批发商那里买鱼的价格是一样的，其它的经营成本也是一样的。

sunday_zhou

还是阅读不过关啊，tax break指的是将来时，而D选项是现在完成时...同意leeon的讲法；但我有一点疑问：像E这种答案如果肯定的话导致原结论不一定正确的时候，也可以作为evaluation题型的选项吗？

leeon

当然可以了，不一定正确就代表着原文的推理有问题。

sunday_zhou

多谢leeon！能经常和你讨论收获良多

rongtt

能否请版主把gwd－24的讨论也汇集到gwd中啊？谢谢

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-8 22:05:38编辑过]

jackzhu69

答案D,

Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs. Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same. But new tax breaks will substantially lower the cost of doing business within the city. Therefore, in the future, profit margins will be higher at seafood stores within the city than at suburban seafood stores.

文中说目前市内外的成本是一样的，但如果新的减税政策出台后，成本高了，有可能导致市内销售利润的减少，反之，无论低还是持平，都为市内销售带来利润。

E，说市内销售价格因为减税还要调低，低过郊外销售价格，是一个无关选项，设定价格的高低并不能导致利润的增减。

供讨论。