[讨论]GWD补充一道逻辑题

richard_zhang

Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-ray because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A)    Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture correctly.

B)    Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.

C)    X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

D)    The  healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.

Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other than ankle bones.

答案是B,但是怎么也看不懂.请高人指点一下!

leeon

Many NN discussed before, and concluded the answer is C.

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=66806

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-21 9:15:54编辑过]