Justify the conclusion这类型只有一道题,俺做错了,贴上: 14. In Washington County, attendance at the movies is just large enough for the cinema operators to make modest profits. The size of the county’s population is stable and is not expected to increase much. Yet there are investors ready to double the number of movie screens in the county within five years, and they are predicting solid profits both for themselves and for the established cinema operators. Which of the following, if true about Washington County, most helps to provide a justification for the investors’ prediction? (A) Over the next ten years, people in their teenage years, the prime movie going age, will be a rapidly growing proportion of the county’s population. (B) As distinct from the existing cinemas, most of the cinemas being planned would be located in downtown areas, in hopes of stimulating an economic revitalization of those areas. (C) Spending on video purchases, as well as spending on video rentals, has been increasing modestly each year for the past ten years. (D) The average number of screens per cinema is lower among existing cinemas than it is among cinemas still in the planning stages. (E) The sale of snacks and drinks in cinemas accounts for a steadily growing share of most cinema operators’ profits. -- by 会员 linlanjun1993 (2012/5/27 18:12:37)
还是考阅读...木有抓到文章的核心这题还是很容易做错... 看看文章的矛盾在哪里,尤其是要注意一些转折词! 人数不怎么增长,然后它们还要开N多个电影院!!还要荒谬的说他们有利润 开的位置本身就是一个无关选项,只要没有解决人数没有增长,但是它们还狂开电影院这个矛盾,其他的信息肯定都是无关的 另外,文章最后说了它们把电影院开在闹市,我个人认为会抢掉乡村的生意吧...(但是这个无关痛痒,反正就是一个无关选项) 一定要搞清楚文章的矛盾在哪里,到底是哪里出了问题,哪里需要解决 |