20天后重新发射，余心之所善兮，虽九死其犹未悔

linlanjun1993

下午  sc20+cr support 8/assumption 15     欠下8道assumption,捂脸。。

贴一下错了的题
69. When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on non-evading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.
The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?
(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from year to year.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
(0) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax
rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes.

linlanjun1993

毛毛说这是个环形推理链，要求填补GAP
俺的推理链：避税→税率增加→增加非避税者负担→更多人避税
然后俺莫名地选了B，真是莫名奇妙，后来发现光看B讲了这么多无关的东西都应该果断排除额
然后答案C
至今我还没完全懂C是个啥子意思，那句 they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion
求解~~~~@dukb

linlanjun1993

另外一道是assumption的题
84. Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) These winemakers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
(B) Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reaction.
(C) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
(D) Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
(E) Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these winemakers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

linlanjun1993

很多人对sulfites过敏，有些winemakers不在酒里加sulfites,那些对s过敏但又想喝酒的人可以喝这些酒就无风险了。。。
答案E，说s并没有一开始就在酒里有足够量导致过敏，想通了。如果一开始就有，那无论如何都要过敏了。
俺选的A，后来一看，神马乱七八糟的。。。。

linlanjun1993

继续做阅读，BTW，今下午趴自习室时戴上了那个淘宝买的3M耳塞，买的最贵的那个，加运费28元。效果很好额，基本上声音都听不到了，睡得很好。被噪音困扰的童鞋可以试下。

DUKB24

另外一道是assumption的题
84. Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) These winemakers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
(B) Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reaction.
(C) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
(D) Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
(E) Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these winemakers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

-- by 会员 linlanjun1993 (2012/5/26 20:50:45)

其实有很多CR题就纯粹就是在考阅读，来来来用SC方法来解决这道题，先把这题的结论简化一下。
people can drink wines  without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
文章想解决的是喝这个酒到底会不会对S物质过敏（因为这些酒的制作人把这个S物质，原本是作为防腐的，给去掉了）
我想看清了这个结论ABCD都是无关的吧...B选项之前很多人问，这里顺带提下，文章说了不是所有的S物质，是certain的才会引起，所以B选项其实已经被文章assume了，若再往深一步分析，会不会加入酒里面的S物质就是不会引起人们过敏那种呢？不知道！文章的信息没给...其实说到这里都是想太多，B很明显就是无关的，对于假设题还不放心你就取非，削弱的肯定是正确选项...

DUKB24

[quote]
下午  sc20+cr support 8/assumption 15     欠下8道assumption,捂脸。。

贴一下错了的题
69. When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on non-evading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income.
The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?
(A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes.
(B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from year to year.
(C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion.
(0) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax
rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time.
(E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes.

-- by 会员 linlanjun1993 (2012/5/26 20:38:45)

[/quote

这题我当时做，C选项我也没看懂，但是我还是选了C，因为其他选项无关得太明显了...（到现在为止C选项我也没看懂，真正到考场每题都看懂我觉得不一定100%可能，所以怎么在看不懂正确选项的情况下排除其余干扰选项就很重要了）
A：选项说税率上升，会激励人们去提高收入，但是没有说人们会不会继续逃税！如果会继续逃税的话这个恶性循环就会继续了
B：检查逃税人的方法比较贵，这个真的是一点关系都没有了！
D：这个可以不用读懂，来，看到一个lowering就可以直接排除为无关，因为文中讨论的是税率上升所导致的后果
E：缴税人的不同。。。对循环链一点影响都没有


C如果从作为正确选项的情况来思考：应该是说，政府不会容忍有少部分的税被逃掉（如果政府容忍少部分的税被逃掉，也就是循环链第一个部分的有人逃税发生了，但是政府容忍了，它不会去提高税率，直接就灭了这个逻辑链）

Rena张

林兰君很棒哇~~~ 加油加油~~~ 看好你哇~~~嘻嘻

linlanjun1993

另外一道是assumption的题
84. Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) These winemakers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
(B) Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reaction.
(C) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
(D) Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
(E) Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these winemakers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

-- by 会员 linlanjun1993 (2012/5/26 20:50:45)

其实有很多CR题就纯粹就是在考阅读，来来来用SC方法来解决这道题，先把这题的结论简化一下。
people can drink wines  without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
文章想解决的是喝这个酒到底会不会对S物质过敏（因为这些酒的制作人把这个S物质，原本是作为防腐的，给去掉了）
我想看清了这个结论ABCD都是无关的吧...B选项之前很多人问，这里顺带提下，文章说了不是所有的S物质，是certain的才会引起，所以B选项其实已经被文章assume了，若再往深一步分析，会不会加入酒里面的S物质就是不会引起人们过敏那种呢？不知道！文章的信息没给...其实说到这里都是想太多，B很明显就是无关的，对于假设题还不放心你就取非，削弱的肯定是正确选项...

-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/5/26 21:37:28)

谢谢DUKB滴解释！
确实逻辑对我来说就是在考阅读额，有时候没读懂那个选项都莫名的选了
取非削弱真心好办法啊~~~~~

linlanjun1993

林兰君很棒哇~~~ 加油加油~~~ 看好你哇~~~嘻嘻

-- by 会员 Rena张 (2012/5/26 22:00:28)

啊啊啊，rena这真是对我莫大的鼓励了，感觉G对俺来说太困难了，复习的时候各种晕菜~有时候题目看不进去就很想砸电脑的说。。
总之俺会好好努力的，不上700俺是绝不放弃的，底线是10月份，申请材料递交之前额TOT