ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: joe11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再战日志

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2004-10-4 06:33:00 | 只看该作者
JOE11,帮你顶,顺便问问菜鸟系列哪里有?呵呵。
22#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-4 12:00:00 | 只看该作者

Done with GWD-1 & 2.

Quite a few questions left. searching CD for some previous solutions.

23#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-4 12:20:00 | 只看该作者
24#
发表于 2004-10-5 00:52:00 | 只看该作者
joe11:GWD1-40有问过吗?好像没看到。
25#
发表于 2004-10-5 01:29:00 | 只看该作者

I typed a lot but they're all gone. So I'm sorry I have to type it in English as it's much faster.


Just want to give some thoughts:


SC: OG, OG, and OG. That's what I got. I also included this expreience in my another post. But here I would like to share with you again. What I did is on my 4th review of OG, I reviewed the OG explanation after I did every question. Another word, I didn't do 20 questions a time. Instead, I did one question every time and immediately looked at the explanation. But the most important point - I think- is, I tried to explore every error of every wrong choice and then check them with OG explanation. And mark those errors I missed and those errors that are actually correct. After this, I summery those confusing sentences such as "like...", "more...than", "as...as" etc. What I did is to put all the relative questions in one column in an Excel file. (if you want , I can send it to you). By doing so, you can review them together and you will have more understanding about those questions. But all these 2 process have to be done by yourself, othervise you won't have any improvement.


RC:


If you have done with OG RC, why not try some other passages such as "GMAT 64-177" by using Xiao'An Reading tips?


Let me know if you dont get what I said.I'm sorry I dont want to retype it in Chinese. And good luck to you!

26#
发表于 2004-10-5 01:55:00 | 只看该作者
joe11 ,非常感謝你提供的東西,真是太好了, 我從今天開始正式接觸GMAT了。 希望能夠繼續得到你的指點,呵呵。
27#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-5 20:28:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks Valarie for your suggestions. I'm doing your way. I'm going through the 菜鸟手册 and it should be done by this Friday.

To sally, welcome on board. Please buckle up, it will be a rough ride. The nearest Exit is on your back. (sorry, there is no way back. )

蓝羽, GWD1-40 is here: http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=55228 but it's not very helpful.

28#
发表于 2004-10-6 00:24:00 | 只看该作者

Until mow, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.  arents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated.  A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children.  However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.


Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
  2. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.
  3. The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.
  4. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
  5. The nasal spray vaccine is not effective when administered to adults.

又看了一遍GWD1-40,题目关注的应该是预防,把E取非,nasal spray vaccine 对成年人预防感冒有效,但是不能削弱论点。所以不是假设。

再讨论。

29#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-6 03:09:00 | 只看该作者

I agree with you.  The answer should be  D.

30#
发表于 2004-10-6 04:00:00 | 只看该作者
I agree with D too. Good luck and I will follow your posts.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-2 19:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部