ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: joe11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再战日志

[精华] [复制链接]
81#
发表于 2004-10-12 05:42:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用joe11在2004-10-11 20:57:00的发言:

原文讲 producing buildings that are not functional for public use,


而从 not functional 到not unobtrusive 还得有个过程,但 B 并没有说明这一点。


所以不能一槌子砸定。看看别的感觉逻辑漏洞更多,所以只好选它了。


如果我对原文没理解错的话, unobtrusive 是类似美学概念,而 functional 是技术活,


这道题我同意joe11的理解。

82#
发表于 2004-10-12 09:15:00 | 只看该作者

I have put this quesion in the logic field. Pls refer to the following link:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=4593&page=1

83#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-12 13:20:00 | 只看该作者

I don't know what you know, but I have to look deeper into Lawyer_1's illustration.

Need to do some FeiFei-Logic.

84#
发表于 2004-10-12 13:44:00 | 只看该作者

Here "violated this precept" means that the work of architecture not be both inviting and functional for public use, and the "be unobtrusive" is a necessary condition to the precept, so violated the precept means that the work of architectures not be unobtrusive.

That's what Lawyer means, but I can't confirm , if u get any other examples, collect them to put here pls.

85#
发表于 2004-10-12 21:43:00 | 只看该作者

I think "violate the precept" means "violate the precept of "must be unobtrusive, therefore it's not functional".  This is because unobtrusive actually means the opposite of "egoism".


Just my thought.

86#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-13 13:08:00 | 只看该作者

Precept = "IF a work of architecture is to be both inviting and functional for public use, it must be unobtrusive."


Leeon:"so violated the precept means that the work of architectures not be unobtrusive. "


上面的 precept 是一个 A→B 的推倒关系,怎么能一否定,仅否定主句B,把条件A给忘了?


非(A→B)= 非(非A  或 B)  =  (A 和 非B)


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-13 13:16:00编辑过]
87#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-13 13:18:00 | 只看该作者

杀奔 GWD-6.

88#
发表于 2004-10-13 13:25:00 | 只看该作者
加油啊!
89#
发表于 2004-10-13 15:24:00 | 只看该作者

To Valarie and Joe11, I think u're right, if "violated the precept" here means that the work of architectures not be unobtrusive, we would safely arrive at the conclusion as B mentioned.

Xealot,  +U!

90#
发表于 2004-10-14 01:00:00 | 只看该作者

9月机经1. 一个长方体要用纸包装,5, 10, 25 inches为高及边长,底面不要包,问最少要用多少面积的纸?


流沙的答案:如果是整张纸的话, (25+5+5)×(5+5+10)=700


狗狗:若没限定高与边长, 800


horsefish:2*(5*10+5*25)+10*25=600


我觉得流沙是对的。horsefish的算法是计算表面积,如果要求整张纸就不行了。狗狗的算法是不知道哪个是底面积,什么样的纸可以通用。



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-14 1:09:11编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-22 14:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部