ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: joe11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再战日志

[精华] [复制链接]
161#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-11 14:33:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks, Leeon, for helping with those CR questions.

However, I haven't got them right yet. Further guidance is necessary.

162#
发表于 2004-11-11 21:13:00 | 只看该作者

My first GMAT score is not a good one, now I want to take it again.

I think the most important thing to me is to what's my weekness, and then plan to improve it.

just like to write an essay, why now? why MBA?

ask yourself, ask yourself, again ask yourself, and you will know.

163#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-12 00:14:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks, cloud.

Those questions have been in my mind for a while and I have a clear answer now.

164#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-12 11:31:00 | 只看该作者

Question: 补充250中114。

114. Repelled by bodily punishments such as maiming and branding, the idea of penitentiaries were reforms of the penal system by Quakers.

(A) the idea of penitentiaries were reforms of the penal system by Quakers

(B) penitentiaries were ideas for reform of the penal system suggested by Quakers

(C) Quakers suggested the penitentiary as a reform of the penal system

(D) Quakers suggested that the penal system be reformed as penitentiaries(C)

(E) the penitentiary was suggested to be a reform of the penal system by Quakers

大家解释一下 C, D 的区别吧。Thanks!

165#
发表于 2004-11-12 11:40:00 | 只看该作者

关键是意思不同:

C: Q建议教养所是刑事系统的一种改善。(符合原文)

D: Q建议将刑事系统改成教养所。(改变原意,逻辑也有问题)

166#
发表于 2004-11-12 12:20:00 | 只看该作者
leeon 说的对,还有简洁性,主动优于被动吧?
167#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-12 12:26:00 | 只看该作者

oh....

终于又看见你们了, 久违了。 呵呵

168#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-12 23:23:00 | 只看该作者

FeiFei-97.

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=18653&page=1

I've been asking Lawyer a few times, you can see the 'conversation' back and forth many times in a day

and not productive at all. From that, we may learn how important effective communication is.

I couldn't comprehend his point. What frustrates me is that he uses abstract theory to explain a simple concept, or in other times, attempt to explain the difference by an analogy while providing no relationship between the comparison objects. (since I'm still in the maze and couldn't see the links)

I need someone to explain the logic error in a simple and effective way, then upgrade to a theoratical level.

right now, I'm in a convoluted maze, please explain the direction in a simple, effective and understandable manner.

Thanks.

169#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-13 22:37:00 | 只看该作者

ok, Thanks, valarie & Leeon. 搞清楚充分必要条件的表达方式了。

谢谢。

170#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-15 08:39:00 | 只看该作者

I did 13 passages of RC of OG over the weekend. Now I can see a clear picture of Leeon's strategy.

Thanks, Leeon.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-25 01:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部