- UID
- 725305
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-2-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
婷婷was not available yesterday. 呵呵,今天改完贴这 5.9 独立 改 5月9日Independent Writing 终于有进步只超时了5分钟,我摔 11.8.5 NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for your friend to ask you for help (suppose you are good at the subject) than to turn to a tutor when he finds it hard to pass an examination.
Have you ever be troubled with a tough subject and wondered what to do with it? The choice seems to be clear but kind of difficult to decide—to ask your friend who are good at this subject or to turn to a tutor. If this situation happens on my friend, I, personally, would like he(him)(to)come up to me for help. Here are my reasons.
First of all, friendship not only means sharing happiness, but also means sticking through hard times. To help a friend with his subject at the time he needs is like to save a lame dog go over stairs. There is no doubt that giving out a hand to friend at emergency will consolide(consolidate)friendship. Take my best friend John for example. There was a preriod(period) when I was in high school, during whih(删掉) I was not good at chemistry, while John was. Everytime(Every time) I was stuck on a puzzle, I turn(turned) to John, even when the final exam was nearby. John showed nothing but patience, and anwsered(answered) every question I put forward. Through hard times, we understand more about friendship, and we has substained(sustained)our friendship since then.
In addition, helping friend to solve subject problem is not only a one-way pay. That is to say, people who offer help also improve his or her owm(own) knowledge,because knowledge is revised at the same time when people use it. A recent survey conducted by TsinghuaUniversity demostrates(demonstrates) that by helping others solving on certain subjects, people enhance their memory by a large extent, which the experiment shows to be 47(瓜瓜,这个数据有点低,再高一点~) percent.(在后面来点总结性的说理比较好,要不然就显得太短了)
Admittedly, professors seem to be more reliable to give the right answer to one’s problem on a certain object. However, the obstacle is that it seems professors are always quite busy. It is obvious that they do not have time to answer every students'(所有格) question. What is more, since the distinction of students, it is difficult for professor to give a specific suggestion to every student on how to improve their academic scores.
To sum up, as help from friends is easier to reach, and friends can also improve through help, I stand for the idea that it is better for one to ask friends’ help when he or she has problems on subjects.
Conclusion:1.瓜瓜一定要注意拼写哦,还有仔细拼一下demonstrate
2.中间说理的那段,如果数例不够的话,就再分析一下数例,这样更完整
3.分论点安排得很好,不错!
综合 改 5.9 TOP10 The reading passage and the lecture explore the reason why (the这个地方感觉加个冠词比较好)sea otter population declined along the Alaskan coast. While the passage considers that pollution hypothesis could explains this situation, the professor points out the predator hypothesis is more likely to answer the question.
First,while the passage thinks that the industrial chemical pollutions infected otters and indirectly killed them, the professor demostrates(demonstrates) that this assertion is rather weak, because there were no dead otters found on the coast. According to the professor, if otters were dead becaust(because) of pulltion(pollution)(直接写killed by pollution), then there should be dead bodies. The absence of the dead bodies supports the predator hypothesis, because predators ate up otters, and leave no bodies.
Second, the passage indictis(indicates) that as the decline of sea mammals in the entire ecosystem may attributrs(attributes)to orcas, who prefer to hunt large prey, pollution is best explanation to the decline. However, the professor shows that it is (actually)caused by orcas.(不用标点)because the decline of large prey, orcas tended(tend) to fed on small animals(such as seal lions, seals and otters这里把例子给出来比较好), and eventually cause the entire decline of sea mammals.
Last, the professor points out the uneven pattern of otter decline is exactly the evidence of predator hypothesis, which contradicts the view of passage. According to the professor, as orcas were not accessible to the shadow and rocky place, otter population was higher than the coast(这点听力中没有体现), which is easier for orca to reach.
In a nutshell, the professor demostrate(demonstrates) the predator hypothesis is more rational than the pollution one to explain the decline of otter population on the Alaskan coast.
Conclusion:瓜瓜这篇,拼写错误有几个,一定要注意拼准了哦~其他的都不错啦!
5.9 TOP10 The reading passage and the lecture explore the reason why (the这个地方感觉加个冠词比较好)sea otter population declined along the Alaskan coast. While the passage considers that pollution hypothesis could explains this situation, the professor points out the predator hypothesis is more likely to answer the question.
First,while the passage thinks that the industrial chemical pollutions infected otters and indirectly killed them, the professor demostrates(demonstrates) that this assertion is rather weak, because there were no dead otters found on the coast. According to the professor, if otters were dead becaust(because) of pulltion(pollution)(直接写killed by pollution), then there should be dead bodies. The absence of the dead bodies supports the predator hypothesis, because predators ate up otters, and leave no bodies.
Second, the passage indictis(indicates) that as the decline of sea mammals in the entire ecosystem may attributrs(attributes)to orcas, who prefer to hunt large prey, pollution is best explanation to the decline. However, the professor shows that it is (actually)caused by orcas.(不用标点)because the decline of large prey, orcas tended(tend) to fed on small animals(such as seal lions, seals and otters这里把例子给出来比较好), and eventually cause the entire decline of sea mammals.
Last, the professor points out the uneven pattern of otter decline is exactly the evidence of predator hypothesis, which contradicts the view of passage. According to the professor, as orcas were not accessible to the shadow and rocky place, otter population was higher than the coast(这点听力中没有体现), which is easier for orca to reach.
In a nutshell, the professor demostrate(demonstrates) the predator hypothesis is more rational than the pollution one to explain the decline of otter population on the Alaskan coast.
Conclusion:瓜瓜这篇,拼写错误有几个,一定要注意拼准了哦~其他的都不错啦!
|
|