GWD-9-39

zyzcdcdcd

大家注意，D的是没有歧义的

如果有歧义，  75%+33%>100%  更不合逻辑，所以D的歧义可以被排除  这里的33%肯定是指德国的

Winbolin

這困擾著我一年多, D雖然結構大致看起來與前句對稱,. 可是仔細念個幾遍, 發現句意上就是說不上來的, 看了攜隱及版主的解釋, 才知是介系詞修飾錯誤:

C. whereas nuclear power accounts for just over 33 percent of the energy produced in Germany

核能僅佔了德國能源的33%

D. whereas just over 33 percent of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany

33%的能源來自於德國的核能, 還是德國的能源？？

luluQ

I think both C and D are ambiguous.

MaccMichAA

...

MaccMichAA

听薰衣紫草nn的一席话 胜读十年书

vivian850831

肯定是D~

Over 75 percent of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power

这说明法国生产了的ENERGY中核能占75%，那么33%又如何再度构成法国核能的一部分呢？！

所以没有歧义

Koror

Choose D

livetofly

still prefer C, which is very accurate in saying that compared to 75% of France's energy are produced by nuclear power , in germany, while only 33% of Germany's energy are produced by nuclear power.

however for D, you can read two meanings:

1. it is as what i just said above.

2. 75% of France's energy produced by nuclear power( in France, or in somewhere else worldwide), where 33% of them are actually produced by nuclear power in Germany, i.e. France "buy" certain energy from Germany.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-18 20:36:33编辑过]

try5

I strongly agree with D, 75% + 33% not equal to 100%, here they wanna show the nuclear that compare with two countries. so ETS wanan examine parallel.

otherwise, the (C) "account for" little bit of weird.

dreamchaserdan

做的时候选了(C)，review的时候选了(D)，最后还是觉得(D)比较好。

(A)(E)都有同样的问题，主语it和宾语33 percent之间要用逻辑关系的词连接起来，比如：account for或者comes from，因为不能说能源是33%，且(E)明显啰嗦；

(B)比较句前面说有多少能源来自于核能，后面说德国用了over 33%，明显逻辑有问题；

(C)此选项说的是核能占德国所产能源的33%，而未划线部分是说超过75%的法国产的能源来源于核能，仔细体会这两句逻辑上是不对等的。

(D)支持它的理由前面各位也提到：

1）75+33>100

2）in Germany作为状语并不限定修饰nuclear power，而是修饰整句话

3）最对称