这选项属于排除因果倒置的类型,也就是LAWYER所说的因果不颠倒。 另外感觉GMAT的WEAKEN和SUPPORT题的思路是如此地相近,WEAKEN比较绕的一种选项就是因果倒置,然后此题就是与之相反的一个代表。还有就是WEAKEN的最常见手法就是他因削弱,然而SUPPORT的最常见手法就是架桥,也就是他因来联系因果。 感觉这道题跟下面这道题很像: GWD3-Q32: Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?C A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed. B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population. C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does. E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime. 因果不颠倒,take college-level courses 的人并不是不会再犯罪的人,也就是说不是 不犯罪推出想 take college-level courses 。 |