婷婷 我来晚了。。sorry! 黄色高亮为亮点 红色为内容不足 绿色为表达上的不足
5.4 综合
In the passage, the writer
pitches three competing theories about the use of Chaco buildings. However, the lecturer casts doubt on these hypothses, and he believes none of them is convincing. The lecturer's views
are as follows.(缺少表语,as follow是adv.)To begin with, the author
assumes that the Chaco structures were purely residential. On the contrary, the speaker
refutes this point. According to him, though the building outside looks like the native house, the inside of this building
does not agree the author's point. Additionally, since these structures each housed hundreds of people at that time, it is supposed to have many fire places for cooking. Unfortunately, the stucture indeed has few fire places, so it
can not(cannot才是正确的写法,另外缺少be) used for housing people.
Moreover, the professor
disproves the second theory given by the writer. From the professor's part, he
ascertains the
ideal(idea) that Chaco structures were used to store food supplies is
unpersuasive. To explain this, he stresses that there are little grain maize on the floor or maize containers in the structures. So
we(we用在这里有点唐突) could figure out that the Chaco structures
may (缺少动词,be)not the store places for food supplies.
Besides, the passage
demonstrates that houses were used as ceremonial centers.
Conversely, the lecturer is skeptical about this. He emphasizes that
material such as sand and stone found in mound may come from the constructions or pots which were used to cook meal. (这个和听力意思有点出入,听力貌似是讲 也发现了sand 和 stone,另外pots很可能是以前建筑工人留下的)Therefore, we
safely arrive the point that the Chacos houses were not the exact places for special ceremonies.
To sum up
, considering in depth about the use of Chaco building, the speaker
shows hesitation on these three competing theories presented by the writer.
总评 婷婷把文章写得很丰满,词语用的很好,听力的细节把握也很好。注意一下表达上的错误就好。 very good!
-- by 会员 瓜瓜不瓜 (2012/5/5 18:07:54)