法国高商 问答帖 (改版：开放各行业讨论，不限于金融）

Evonext

Omeng 发表于 2013-5-10 20:03
1.想学物流就去南特..不想学物流就去EDHEC那个项目嘛..
2.你可以去网站看看两个项目的placement..
综合起 ...

其实没有哪个专业是特别偏好的，不然也不会纠结。主要是想知道哪个能更容易实现我的职业目标，或者哪个尽l‘oreal 的机会大，待遇更好啦。毕竟EDHEC 是不错的...可是担心专业水。。

Derman

dysg 发表于 2013-5-10 10:57
Derman你好，

从老帖子一直追来这里，感觉收获很多。谢谢你能这样耐心的回答我们这些新人的问题。

Know some friends find full-time job of marketing in France, Singapore and Hong Kong (definitely more in China). I guess it's not that hard to find a job in France.

Go for it if you like it. Do what you like is much much more important than comps and anything else.

Derman

Evonext 发表于 2013-5-10 16:22
hi Derman，
看到这个帖子太好了，最近正在准备申请，纠结于专业选择。
一年多知名物流企业工作经验，可是 ...

I would go to Ehdec if I were you. Then have stronger brandname and you can have various choices in a mixed general program, Logistics/Supply chain is definitely one of them. I don't think a specialized program is that important given logitstic/supply chain is not rocket science like Physics or Financial Math.

You basically answered your own question, student of business major Ehdec can go to any dept in L'Oreal, including logistics, while Audencia, well, you can only try logistics dept in L'Oreal.

I would say 所有法国商校项目都很水（compared with US ones), even it's HEC.

JIMLEERH

The last sentence brightened...i am very very interested in this topic! what are your standards in defining 水？ would you please specify why French business schools are 水while US ones are not? Thanks a lot!

joeyzz

Derman, 你好，这个帖子从第一页看到最后一页，收获很多。关于学校我还是有一个问题想问一下：
就你觉得，LSE那些一年的项目跟HEC的金融比起来如何呢？例如在reputation，实习，就业上。我的感受是，HEC有三年时间，有更多机会做实习，留下来的几率好像也比较高。LSE只有一年，学费和生活费也很高。但是如果回国的话，LSE的名声好像要响一点哦？

Evonext

Derman 发表于 2013-5-11 07:09
I would go to Ehdec if I were you. Then have stronger brandname and you can have various choices in ...

yeah.. If you say so, school ranking is still the most important factor for company, right?

Even if I graduate from global business  of EDHEC and work in supply chain dept, there will not be some negative effects when get promoted for the reason that I don't have a professional background ?
For example, two candidates with the same level,one is majored in supply chain of Audencia ,another is global business of EDHEC. Which one will be more competitive?
Or the company will consider more about one's individual performance &ability but not where are you from?

Derman

JIMLEERH 发表于 2013-5-11 09:37
The last sentence brightened...i am very very interested in this topic! what are your standards in d ...

I was comparing French top grande ecole (top 5) with US top 20 in Finance (Stanford, CMU, Michigan...)
US schools care much more about GPA, homework and exams, which made their students more focused on studies. French schools generally don't care that much about GPA, as long as you get 10 out of 20, you are fine.

My experience of French grande ecoles is, you learn less things from professors and nothing from classmates, cuz nobody cares. Upside is you are left with so much time to choose what you wanna study and pick up by yourself. Also, the gap year internship is great. US schools don't have it. If you work in the core dept of whatever industry as intern, the thing you learn will give you another fresh look at what you study at school.

Also bear in mind that Chinese students from top tier US graduate finance programs (think CMU/NYU/Stanford) are far smarter than those in Grande Ecoles (given the fierce competition of admission for US unis), they are more outgoing, confident and probably more book-smart too.

Derman

joeyzz 发表于 2013-5-11 10:09
Derman, 你好，这个帖子从第一页看到最后一页，收获很多。关于学校我还是有一个问题想问一下：
就你觉得，L ...

I don't suggest LSE graduate programs, they look like money generating machine, admitting so many students. And one year is too short to even explore London, not to mention learn real things. But LSE undergrad is great!

Derman

Evonext 发表于 2013-5-11 10:37
yeah.. If you say so, school ranking is still the most important factor for company, right?

Even  ...

I don't see why a supply chain department needs a candidate with "professional" degree. I have to say again it's over estimated here. Yes, you need a medical degree if you are surgeon, you need an engineering/science degree if you are working for NASA. But, come on, supply chain, is not that technical right?

I would say, more companies focus on the whole package. If you have an option that will open more doors for you, why you wanna narrow down your choices?

JIMLEERH

Derman 发表于 2013-5-11 19:01
I was comparing French top grande ecole (top 5) with US top 20 in Finance (Stanford, CMU, Michigan. ...

实习最重要 修行靠个人