ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Suri在奋斗
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于Ving用法—og12 sc 中21和og25比较,有点迷惑了

  [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2012-2-5 16:36:56 | 只看该作者
链接过来好了<br />http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-650744-3-1.html
22#
发表于 2012-2-5 16:46:59 | 只看该作者
懂了 &nbsp;这道也出现在OG 30里 &nbsp;解释为 revealing <span style="color:#fe2419;">the purpose </span>of &nbsp;of the items 理解为是 adv,表目的。~~马上回去编辑
23#
发表于 2012-2-12 20:16:22 | 只看该作者
强烈感谢~~这个语法点一直不太懂,终于现在清晰了!
24#
发表于 2012-2-13 04:28:22 | 只看该作者
MARK...........
25#
发表于 2012-2-13 09:49:08 | 只看该作者
baby姐,你好,看完讨论后对ving的用法清晰了很,再次感谢。有一个疑问过去分词修饰的时候与v-ing是不一样的吗?也就是说只能就近修饰前面的名词吗?<br />例如:OG 12 28题,<br />Building on civilizations that preceded them in coastal Peru, the Mochica developed their own elaborate society, <strong>based on</strong> the cultivation of such crops like corn and beans, the harvesting of fish and shellfish, and the exploiting other wild and domestic resources.<br />这里的就是只能修饰society而不能修饰Mochica的对吗?
26#
发表于 2012-2-13 10:43:23 | 只看该作者
你说得对,v-ed modifier和v-ing是不一样的,是noun modifier.<br /><br />from Ron &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br />http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/building-on-civilizations-that-preceded-them-in-coastal-peru-t8434.html &nbsp;<br /><br /><span style="color:#d40a00;"><span style="background-color:#fef4c4;">past participles function as adjectives; they ALWAYS modify nouns. &nbsp;it's actually impossible for a past participle to modify a whole clause.</span></span><br /><br /><span style="color:#d40a00;">you're thinking of the rule for &quot;clause + , + -ING&quot;, which doesn't extend to past participles.</span><br /><br /><br />from Mitch &nbsp; &nbsp;http://www.beatthegmat.com/sentence-correction-parallelism-og-q28-t86697.html<br /><br /><em>Based</em> does in fact modify <em>society</em>.<br /><br /><span style="background-color:#feed9b;">NOUN + PAST PARTICIPLE (with no intervening comma) </span>is used when the past participle modifier is needed to <span style="background-color:#feed9b;">define</span> the noun that it modifies:<br /><br /><strong>The Mohica developed a society based on the cultivation of crops.</strong><br /><br />What kind of society? &nbsp;A society <em>based on the cultivation of crops</em>. &nbsp;Since the past participle modifier is defining the kind of society being discussed, it is not preceded by a comma. <br /><br /><span style="background-color:#feed9b;">NOUN + COMMA + PAST PARTICIPLE</span> is used when the past participle modifier <span style="background-color:#feed9b;">does NOT define the noun that it modifies but simply provides additional information</span>:<br /><br /><strong>The Mohica developed their own elaborate society, based on the cultivation of crops...</strong><br /><br />What kind of society? &nbsp;THEIR OWN ELABORATE society. &nbsp;We don't need an additional modifier to define what society is being discussed. &nbsp;Since the past participle modifier does not define the society but only provides additional information about the society, it is preceded by a comma.<br /><br />In less formal writing, a comma might be inserted before a past participle in order to indicate that the past participle refers to an earlier noun in the sentence:<br /><br /><strong>John entered the room, exhausted.</strong><br /><br />In the sentence above, the comma is used to indicate that <em>exhausted</em> refers not to the <em>room</em> but to <em>John</em>. &nbsp;This sort of construction is unlikely to appear in an OA. &nbsp;<span style="background-color:#feed9b;">On the GMAT, NOUN + COMMA + PAST PARTICIPLE generally will be used when the past participle provides non-defining information about the immediately preceding noun.</span><br /><br /><br />关于v-ing的几种考法,这个讨论也值得看:<br />http://www.beatthegmat.com/ing-modifier-three-different-versions-in-og-t38943.html<br />针对有同学提到的OG56,Stacey在这里也提到了:<br />An &quot;-ed&quot; modifier is a noun modifier, not an adverbial modifier, and should modify the <span style="background-color:#feed9b;">closest primary noun preceding it</span> (in the &quot;comma -ed&quot; setup).<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />

<div class="maxcode-quote">
baby姐,你好,看完讨论后对ving的用法清晰了很,再次感谢。有一个疑问过去分词修饰的时候与v-ing是不一样的吗?也就是说只能就近修饰前面的名词吗?<br />例如:OG 12 28题,<br />Building on civilizations that preceded them in coastal Peru, the Mochica developed their own elaborate society, <strong>based on</strong> the cultivation of such crops like corn and beans, the harvesting of fish and shellfish, and the exploiting other wild and domestic resources.<br />这里的就是只能修饰society而不能修饰Mochica的对吗?<div style="text-align:right;">-- by 会员 <u>Royzhang0929</u> (2012/2/13 9:49:08)</div><br />
</div>
27#
发表于 2012-2-13 10:58:13 | 只看该作者
长见识鸟,膜拜,膜拜~~<br /><br />超级感谢baby姐~<img src="/static/legacy-emoticon/0.gif" emoticon="[em:0]" alt="" />
28#
发表于 2012-2-13 11:07:16 | 只看该作者
关于royalzhang提到的v-ed的问题,突然想到了一点,就是对于类似&quot;when v-ed&quot;, &quot;after v-ed&quot;,需要applies to the subject.<br />http://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2012/01/28/modifiers-and-meaning-a-gmatprep-sentence-correction-problem-2<br /><br />我不记得在哪里见过一个例子,好像是<br />Mary had been pruning(这个动词我真不记得了,类似咱炒绿叶蔬菜之前“择菜”的过程,不是pruning,暂且拿它占个坑吧) vegetables until exhausted.<br />这里&quot;until exhausted&quot; 指的是主语Mary, exhausted=very tired<br />不能理解为指的是蔬菜,否则就该是<br />Mary had been pruning vegetables until they were exhausted. <br />这里exhausted修饰vegetables,exhausted=drained, depleted. <br />btw: exhausted意思太多了,建议大家查下英英字典。
29#
发表于 2012-2-13 13:20:28 | 只看该作者
这个帖子真好,吧Ving的用法很系统的总结了 顶
30#
发表于 2012-2-13 16:24:21 | 只看该作者
想请教一个ving以外的话题,原句中有based on“作为基础”的含义,而正确答案E中using...没有把描述作为基础的含义吧?可能就是按他们说的,学者们直接画的,而不是把它们所说的作为一个“基础”。。<br />所以我觉得E是不对的,因为改变了句意。<br />我觉得选C。。。请指正
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 小分队

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-25 06:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部