暂时停止更新~suri的gmat之旅，加油加油~~~~

yiayia

gwd 17套
sc 16/19    20,37，17
cr   6/9     4,10,31
rc   9/13    7,8,27,32

20. GWD26-Q20
In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A.    chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week
B.    chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week
C.    chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997
D.    chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997
E.    chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997
选的是c，答案是B
B的时态问题，一上来就排除了呀

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/15 16:29:30)

sc好强大啊，今天做17也被打击了。。哎 不贴错误率了。
着重开始刷刷sc，现在的状态还不行啊。

Suri在奋斗

阅读是体力活啊~~内容看多了，时间不够的，还是得抓结构~~
加油~
我上自习的地方和上课的地方属于一片楼群哈，点名的时候端个水杯就直接冲进去。。。还有手机。。。

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/3/15 20:53:23)

queen B （介不介意我这么喊咯）我真脚着你好可爱O(∩_∩)O哈！

Suri在奋斗

suri加油~~~
我们这学期财政平时分有50~苍天呀
今天也是留作业了

-- by 会员 xeyyxzty (2012/3/15 22:22:27)

50啊！！！
熊熊一定要认真对待，上大学第一次知道有的课平时成绩居然居然50分啊~~
但今天好不容易过去写了一堂课作业，最后不用交了，真是服了这个老师

Suri在奋斗

gwd 17套
sc 16/19    20,37，17
cr   6/9     4,10,31
rc   9/13    7,8,27,32

20. GWD26-Q20
In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A.    chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week
B.    chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week
C.    chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997
D.    chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997
E.    chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997
选的是c，答案是B
B的时态问题，一上来就排除了呀

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/15 16:29:30)

sc好强大啊，今天做17也被打击了。。哎 不贴错误率了。
着重开始刷刷sc，现在的状态还不行啊。

-- by 会员 yiayia (2012/3/15 22:26:26)

我到现在还在看17套，本想只看sc错题的，，开始是错了2道，然后看讨论一道我做对的和gwd的答案一样是个错的，然后决定看每个sc，又发现我有做对的，但完全想偏算是误打误撞了，总之还在看中，今天早上也是花了半天看og的正确句子，逻辑没看成，下午出去上课，计划的阅读答案没对成，还有数学jj和阅读jj打算看还没看，今天的计划还是落空了好多

泾渭不凡

。。记得我们学校滴微积分（下）。。全院2/3的莘莘学子挂掉，红灿灿的一片片。。。还好饭饭算是幸免者。。。。。
话说财政有必要掐分这么严么？。。。。。明明是简单类的科目啊。。要是运筹神马的还可以理解。。。老师真残忍。。。熊熊表难过。。。饭饭这里画圈圈。。。。
----------------------------------------------------------
脑残了。。。看错咯。。。是平时分50啊。。。。。。比重大了点吧。。。。。。。。。。
哎。。。也难怪呦。。。。学术性不强的学科。。。

泾渭不凡

Suri~~~输血和阅读JJ加油哈~~~

Suri在奋斗

40. GWD26-Q40
The computer company’s present troubles are a result of technological stagnation, marketing missteps, and managerial blunders so that several attempts to revise corporate strategies have failed to correct it.

A.    so that several attempts to revise corporate strategies have failed to correct it.
B.    so that several attempts at revising corporate strategies have failed to correct.
C.    in that several attempts at revising corporate strategies have failed to correct them.
D.    that several attempts to revise corporate strategies have failed to correct.
E.    that several attempts at revising corporate strategies have failed to correct them
这道题选D
我做的时候是根据，代词放在最后可能出现指代不清的歧义，快速排掉了A,C,E在B和D中选了D
搜了解释，各种说法，最后终于找到了这道题的官方出处，og12语文分册84题
看了og的解释，才发现我想的是完全错误的
是个好题目
that在这里是做定语来修饰那三个原因的
a result of （X，Y and Z )that·····
所以，it ,them 统统错误，因为在这里就如og 说的that 指代三个原因做了correct的宾语 ,
而不是之前有人讨论的是 that引导了一个结果状语，尽管that可以引导结果状语（that也可以等于so that)
我也一度以为是结果状语
是定语从句~！！！




还有关于to do 和 for doing这两个点也在一个帖子上弄懂了
今天做的一道关于to do的选的和gwd的答案一样，事实证明这个是错的
多读外文报纸的好处还是好多的
17. GWD-26-Q17
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.

A.    a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may
B.    a scale that astronomers have developed rates how likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C.    astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D.    astronomers have developed a scale for rating the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E.    astronomers have developed a scale that rates the likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may

我选的是C ，gwd也是C
但是正确答案是D
有大牛找到了Nytimes上的原文

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E6DF1E3EF934A15754C0A96F958260

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.


又看到一个大牛的解释，茅塞顿开
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-231776-3-1.html   20楼
这位大牛这么总结的


首先，C中rate的逻辑主语是astronomers，D中rate逻辑主语是scale。后者更加符合本句的逻辑意思。

另外，从C选项中我跟本不知道这个scale是干什么用的，只知道astronomers develop这个动作的目的(in order to)是rate sth.。可以这样理解，scale这个重要的名词在C选项中被废掉了。
而D选项清楚地表达了这个scale的功能，即a scale that can rate the likelihood。且D中没有用法错误。


To do修饰动词，逻辑主语是to do所修饰动作的发出者
For doing修饰名词，逻辑主语是for doing所修饰的名词
在没有确定句子本意判断逻辑主语的前提下，不能简单说谁优于谁。

类比例子：GWD-18-Q19
New genetic evidence—together with recent studies of elephants’ skeletons, tusks, and other anatomical features—provide compelling support for classifying Africa’s forest elephants and its savanna elephants as separate species.

A.    provide compelling support for classifying
B.    provide compelling support for the classification of
C.    provides compelling support to the classification of
D.    provides compelling support for classifying
E.    provides compelling support to classify

大家还记得这道题吗？正确答案是D，这里同样没有用to do，因为evidence作classify的逻辑主语不合适，其逻辑主语应该是compelling support，所以C比D好。

所以，以后遇到A develop/provide B 后面接to do还是for doing，判断依据就是do/doing的逻辑主语到底应该是谁。如果应是动作发出者A则用to do；如果是名词B则用for doing



而这位大牛举得support的例子，我记得昨天还是前天做错了
选的to do
而看ron的解释是说support后面接名词比较好
但是还是不能让人完全信服，找了manhattan第九章的idiom也没找到关于support的具体用法
而今天看这个大牛的帖子真的觉得讲的太好了


而今天看这两道题目收获是很大~~

Suri在奋斗

Suri~~~输血和阅读JJ加油哈~~~

-- by 会员 泾渭不凡 (2012/3/15 22:38:50)

只能看下数学jj了哈，明天早上看阅读，现在gwd还没弄完~~sign

Suri在奋斗

。。记得我们学校滴微积分（下）。。全院2/3的莘莘学子挂掉，红灿灿的一片片。。。还好饭饭算是幸免者。。。。。
话说财政有必要掐分这么严么？。。。。。明明是简单类的科目啊。。要是运筹神马的还可以理解。。。老师真残忍。。。熊熊表难过。。。饭饭这里画圈圈。。。。
----------------------------------------------------------
脑残了。。。看错咯。。。是平时分50啊。。。。。。比重大了点吧。。。。。。。。。。
哎。。。也难怪呦。。。。学术性不强的学科。。。

-- by 会员 泾渭不凡 (2012/3/15 22:36:41)

说到财政，我们老师是出题老师，考前给我们圈了重点和几道大题，结果````他圈的全部是非重点~！！！
还不如不圈，误导复习呀，我可是把他说的题目就记得滚瓜烂熟了
不只是我，sigh~~~

livia2012

真精彩！看了同样收获很大啊！suri加油啊~

40. GWD26-Q40
The computer company’s present troubles are a result of technological stagnation, marketing missteps, and managerial blunders so that several attempts to revise corporate strategies have failed to correct it.

A.    so that several attempts to revise corporate strategies have failed to correct it.
B.    so that several attempts at revising corporate strategies have failed to correct.
C.    in that several attempts at revising corporate strategies have failed to correct them.
D.    that several attempts to revise corporate strategies have failed to correct.
E.    that several attempts at revising corporate strategies have failed to correct them
这道题选D
我做的时候是根据，代词放在最后可能出现指代不清的歧义，快速排掉了A,C,E在B和D中选了D
搜了解释，各种说法，最后终于找到了这道题的官方出处，og12语文分册84题
看了og的解释，才发现我想的是完全错误的
是个好题目
that在这里是做定语来修饰那三个原因的
a result of （X，Y and Z )that·····
所以，it ,them 统统错误，因为在这里就如og 说的that 指代三个原因做了correct的宾语 ,
而不是之前有人讨论的是 that引导了一个结果状语，尽管that可以引导结果状语（that也可以等于so that)
我也一度以为是结果状语
是定语从句~！！！




还有关于to do 和 for doing这两个点也在一个帖子上弄懂了
今天做的一道关于to do的选的和gwd的答案一样，事实证明这个是错的
多读外文报纸的好处还是好多的
17. GWD-26-Q17
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.

A.    a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may
B.    a scale that astronomers have developed rates how likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C.    astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D.    astronomers have developed a scale for rating the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E.    astronomers have developed a scale that rates the likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may

我选的是C ，gwd也是C
但是正确答案是D
有大牛找到了Nytimes上的原文

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E6DF1E3EF934A15754C0A96F958260

To help deal with public fascination -- and sometimes undue alarm -- about possible threats from asteroids, astronomers have adopted a scale that rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.


又看到一个大牛的解释，茅塞顿开
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-231776-3-1.html   20楼
这位大牛这么总结的


首先，C中rate的逻辑主语是astronomers，D中rate逻辑主语是scale。后者更加符合本句的逻辑意思。

另外，从C选项中我跟本不知道这个scale是干什么用的，只知道astronomers develop这个动作的目的(in order to)是rate sth.。可以这样理解，scale这个重要的名词在C选项中被废掉了。
而D选项清楚地表达了这个scale的功能，即a scale that can rate the likelihood。且D中没有用法错误。


To do修饰动词，逻辑主语是to do所修饰动作的发出者
For doing修饰名词，逻辑主语是for doing所修饰的名词
在没有确定句子本意判断逻辑主语的前提下，不能简单说谁优于谁。

类比例子：GWD-18-Q19
New genetic evidence—together with recent studies of elephants’ skeletons, tusks, and other anatomical features—provide compelling support for classifying Africa’s forest elephants and its savanna elephants as separate species.

A.    provide compelling support for classifying
B.    provide compelling support for the classification of
C.    provides compelling support to the classification of
D.    provides compelling support for classifying
E.    provides compelling support to classify

大家还记得这道题吗？正确答案是D，这里同样没有用to do，因为evidence作classify的逻辑主语不合适，其逻辑主语应该是compelling support，所以C比D好。

所以，以后遇到A develop/provide B 后面接to do还是for doing，判断依据就是do/doing的逻辑主语到底应该是谁。如果应是动作发出者A则用to do；如果是名词B则用for doing



而这位大牛举得support的例子，我记得昨天还是前天做错了
选的to do
而看ron的解释是说support后面接名词比较好
但是还是不能让人完全信服，找了manhattan第九章的idiom也没找到关于support的具体用法
而今天看这个大牛的帖子真的觉得讲的太好了


而今天看这两道题目收获是很大~~

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/15 22:54:35)