暂时停止更新~suri的gmat之旅，加油加油~~~~

yiayia

Some species of Arctic birds arethreatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, whichbreed in the Arctic
and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southernregions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting hasreduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species torecover.
Which of the following, if true, mostseriously undermines the argument?

A.Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response toa sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
B. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting seasonfor snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
C. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every yearfor several years.
D. As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized winteringgrounds that they had not used for several seasons.
E. In the snow goose’s winter habitats,the goose faces no significant natural predation.
今天错的一道逻辑题，本质是语法词~~~

-- by 会员 yiayia (2012/3/12 18:42:47)

这道题是B吧
bat说这种结论是典型的因果型结论，所以要削弱结论就行就是说dropping limits行不通，然后就是b了
b就是我以前经常搞混的一个句型
我开始做这个题目的时候想的是要说dropping limits不行，结果选成A,而A当时看的时候真觉得脑袋不清晰，硬是给我看成是droping limits了，
晚上来看这个就是b了
B是说这个限制早已经被关掉了drop了好多年

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/12 21:49:38)

关于it is+时间段+since
的意思是根据后面的动词性质来定
如果是延续性的动作，就表示不做这个事情多久了
it is three years since he lived here  他不住在这儿已经四年

但是b，我不知道该怎么理解好呀
being closed到底是翻译成，这个限制已经被closed好多年还是这个限制已经not closed好多年
要是理解为not closed的话，就感觉b又不对了，
yiayia说的语法点是指这个么

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/12 22:11:42)

就是指It has been many years since...它指一件事情或者动作过去很久了。
It has been many years since I met you. I met you这件事情已经过去很多年了。
B选项是这么理解的。 文章中提高冬季打猎的时候，政府有这一种restriction：如果GS这种鸟数量下降5%，政府就禁止打猎。但B选项说已经很久没有政府restriction限制打猎期提前结束了。暗示打猎的人少，打的数量不足让GS的鸟数量下来。所以取不取消restriction能不能达到目的。

yiayia

[/quote]漏了什么~~

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/12 22:27:08)

[/quote]5.对文章的第一句话或者认为关键的地方一定要读清楚！！哪怕多读上2遍，这短短的20秒讲对2分钟的阅读产生巨大的影响。所谓读的懂读的越懂，读不懂后面更不可能懂。


呵呵，投资在关键句上的时间性价比很高~~

Suri在奋斗

漏了什么~~

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/12 22:27:08)

[/quote]5.对文章的第一句话或者认为关键的地方一定要读清楚！！哪怕多读上2遍，这短短的20秒讲对2分钟的阅读产生巨大的影响。所谓读的懂读的越懂，读不懂后面更不可能懂。


呵呵，投资在关键句上的时间性价比很高~~

-- by 会员 yiayia (2012/3/12 22:30:59)

[/quote]收了yiayia的黄金阅读总结~！！！

Suri在奋斗

Some species of Arctic birds arethreatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, whichbreed in the Arctic
and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southernregions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting hasreduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species torecover.
Which of the following, if true, mostseriously undermines the argument?

A.Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response toa sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
B. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting seasonfor snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
C. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every yearfor several years.
D. As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized winteringgrounds that they had not used for several seasons.
E. In the snow goose’s winter habitats,the goose faces no significant natural predation.
今天错的一道逻辑题，本质是语法词~~~

-- by 会员 yiayia (2012/3/12 18:42:47)

这道题是B吧
bat说这种结论是典型的因果型结论，所以要削弱结论就行就是说dropping limits行不通，然后就是b了
b就是我以前经常搞混的一个句型
我开始做这个题目的时候想的是要说dropping limits不行，结果选成A,而A当时看的时候真觉得脑袋不清晰，硬是给我看成是droping limits了，
晚上来看这个就是b了
B是说这个限制早已经被关掉了drop了好多年

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/12 21:49:38)

关于it is+时间段+since
的意思是根据后面的动词性质来定
如果是延续性的动作，就表示不做这个事情多久了
it is three years since he lived here  他不住在这儿已经四年

但是b，我不知道该怎么理解好呀
being closed到底是翻译成，这个限制已经被closed好多年还是这个限制已经not closed好多年
要是理解为not closed的话，就感觉b又不对了，
yiayia说的语法点是指这个么

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/3/12 22:11:42)

就是指It has been many years since...它指一件事情或者动作过去很久了。
It has been many years since I met you. I met you这件事情已经过去很多年了。
B选项是这么理解的。 文章中提高冬季打猎的时候，政府有这一种restriction：如果GS这种鸟数量下降5%，政府就禁止打猎。但B选项说已经很久没有政府restriction限制打猎期提前结束了。暗示打猎的人少，打的数量不足让GS的鸟数量下来。所以取不取消restriction能不能达到目的。

-- by 会员 yiayia (2012/3/12 22:29:01)

这个解释我算是彻底懂了，想我刚刚做对也是侥幸
一知半解，我要是逻辑和阅读附体Yiayia就好了，O(∩_∩)O哈哈~

yiayia

“我要是逻辑和阅读附体Yiayia就好了，O(∩_∩)O哈哈~”

SC向Suri看齐，呵呵~~你不知道，今天狒狒逻辑做的闹心有某有！！题目看不下去了,有没有！！错的很多，有没有！！！

Suri在奋斗

“我要是逻辑和阅读附体Yiayia就好了，O(∩_∩)O哈哈~”

SC向Suri看齐，呵呵~~你不知道，今天狒狒逻辑做的闹心有某有！！题目看不下去了,有没有！！错的很多，有没有！！！

-- by 会员 yiayia (2012/3/12 22:38:01)

你在做狒狒呀，之前有人建议说不用看，貌似和考试有区别，我就没看
错的多，想想你的阅读，O(∩_∩)O哈哈~
而且你做的不是官方资料，不用那么纠结~\(≧▽≦)/~啦啦啦
还是很棒的啦

铁板神猴

要命 我看了suri前几个帖子，suri千万要注意以绩点为先啊~！ 神猴就吃过这亏的，到后来申请你会发现还是很重要的！
不过一般上3.5应该是ok了~

Suri在奋斗

要命 我看了suri前几个帖子，suri千万要注意以绩点为先啊~！ 神猴就吃过这亏的，到后来申请你会发现还是很重要的！
不过一般上3.5应该是ok了~

-- by 会员 铁板神猴 (2012/3/12 23:09:57)

恩恩，suri一定谨记啦~!!!!!
O(∩_∩)O谢谢~！！
anyway,一定要更加努力了！！

Suri在奋斗

In an attempt to improve the overall performance of
clerical workers, many companies have introduced
computerized performance monitoring and control
systems (CPMCS) that record and report a worker's
(5) computer-driven activities. However, at least one
study has shown that such monitoring may not be
having the desired effect. In the study, researchers
asked monitored clerical workers and their
supervisors how assessments of productivity
(10) affected supervisors' ratings of workers'
performance. In contrast to unmonitored workers
doing the same work, who without exception
identified the most important element in their jobs
as customer service, the monitored workers and
(15) their supervisors all responded that productivity
was the critical factor in assigning ratings.  . However, measures of the relationship
between overall rating and individual elements of
performance clearly supported the conclusion that
supervisors gave considerable weight to criteria
such as attendance, accuracy, and indications of
(25) customer satisfaction.
       It is possible that productivity may be a
"hygiene factor"; that is, if it is too low, it will hurt
the overall rating. But the evidence suggests that
beyond the point at which productivity becomes
(30) "good enough," higher productivity per se is unlikely
to improve a rating .
这篇文章真心读不懂，还有3个选项也做错了
56. According to the passage, before the final results of
the study were known, which of the following seemed
likely?
(A) That workers with the highest productivity would
also be the most accurate
(B) That workers who initially achieved high
productivity ratings would continue to do so
consistently
(C) That the highest performance ratings would be
achieved by workers with the highest
productivity
(D) That the most productive workers would be
those whose supervisors claimed to value
productivity
(E) That supervisors who claimed to value
productivity would place equal value on
customer satisfaction

57. It can be inferred that the author of the passage
discusses "unmonitored workers" (line 11) primarily in
order to
(A) compare the ratings of these workers with the
ratings of monitored workers
(B) provide an example of a case in which
Monitoring might be effective
(C) provide evidence of an inappropriate use of
CPMCS
(D) emphasize the effect that CPMCS may have on
workers' perceptions of their jobs
(E) illustrate the effect that CPMCS may have on
workers' ratings

58. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly have
supported the conclusion referred to in lines 22-25?
(A) Ratings of productivity correlated highly with
ratings of both accuracy and attendance.
(B) Electronic monitoring greatly increased
productivity.
(C) Most supervisors based overall ratings of
performance on measures of productivity alone
(D) Overall ratings of performance correlated more
highly with measures of productivity than the
researchers expected.
(E) Overall ratings of performance correlated more
highly with measures of accuracy than with
measures of productivity.

木寻云

要命 我看了suri前几个帖子，suri千万要注意以绩点为先啊~！ 神猴就吃过这亏的，到后来申请你会发现还是很重要的！
不过一般上3.5应该是ok了~

-- by 会员 铁板神猴 (2012/3/12 23:09:57)

>___<      上三点五是神马概念啊。。。真是太难了 T T   大一的时候不努力 高数及格 我们学校还不能刷分 太悲惨了。。。哎。。。