谢谢daisy,第一次坐沙发~~
一会回来作~
精练----1'00-----Weaken
B: The old 6 pack can can suffocate the animals.
P: The proposed plan is to switch the old 6 pack can to the new ones, and the rings of can will disintegrate in 3 days after exposing under the sun.
C: Therefore, the number of animals suffocated by the rings of cans will be eliminated after this switchover.
Pre: Some of these new rings of cans will not disintegrate in 3 days.
After switchover, new rings of cans can cause more dangerous to the animals.
Analysis:
(A) The switchover to the new plastic rings will
take at least two more years to complete.
--------------------------------------------------------Although the switchover has to take 2 more years to complete, this new plan can be effective as well.
(B) After the beverage companies have switched
over to the new plastic rings, a substantial
number of the old plastic rings will persist
in most aquatic and woodland environments.
--------------------------------------------------------this can be contender at first.
(C) The new plastic rings are slightly less
expensive than the old rings.
--------------------------------------------------------the price is not irrelevant here.
(D) The new plastic rings rarely disintegrate
during shipping of beverage six-packs
because most trucks that transport canned
beverages protect their cargo from sunlight.
--------------------------------------------------------this doesn't help since the cans will eventually be exposed under the sun after shipping, so this plan can still work.
(E) The new plastic rings disintegrate into
substances that are harmful to aquatic
animals when ingested in substantial
quantities by them.
--------------------------------------------------------I think choice E is better than B. since it mentions the side effect of this new plan.
非常的幸运,这道题目错了~终于找到自己的又一个缺陷:不扣准结论,凭空想象。
解释的这句话非常重要:
Instead, answer choice (E) is a shell game that attacks a conclusion
that is similar but different than the actual conclusion. Remember, one of the
rules for weakening arguments is to focus on the conclusion, and knowing the
details of the conclusion is part of that focus.
经过分析:
(B) After the beverage companies have switched
over to the new plastic rings, a substantial
number of the old plastic rings will persist
in most aquatic and woodland environments.--------------------说明大量的old plastic rings still exist in woodland environments,所以很容易还会继续suffocate animals.
(E) The new plastic rings disintegrate into
substances that are harmful to aquatic
animals when ingested in substantial
quantities by them.----------------------------------------------------E说new plan will be harmful to the aquatic animals首先文中没有特定指出什么样的animals,其次这个选项并没有说是怎样的harm,即有可能不是suffocated造成的,那么就和结论不符了。
-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/11/21 1:07:15)